| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 615 | DALLAS | +375 | | 616 | SEATTLE | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(51-35 since 1997.) (59.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(97-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(24-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96%, +22.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(92-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(78-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +36.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(24-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96%, +22.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(44-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(83-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +29.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(41-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(47-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 4 straight games allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(42-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(72-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(67-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(104-128 since 1997.) (44.8%, +58.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(236-187 since 1997.) (55.8%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points.
(93-107 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(27-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(93-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.4%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(96-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(95-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(106-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(53-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(16-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +28.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(50-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.6%, +45.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(56-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (43.6%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(73-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(42-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(65-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(67-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(88-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.7%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(83-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(46-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.1%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(93-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(80-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(84-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.7%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(65-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.5%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(127-108 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(169-175 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.1%, +36 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 80 | | 31-71 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-16 | 79.7% | 45 | 11 | 16 | | SEATTLE | 85 | | 31-70 | 43.6% | 7-21 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 82.4% | 44 | 11 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 608 times, while DALLAS won 367 times.
Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 19-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7 | DALLAS is 11-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 81.4 | DALLAS is 41-29 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 89.7, OPPONENT 86.1 | SEATTLE is 7-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 81.0 | SEATTLE is 40-72 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | SEATTLE is 6-25 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 89.9 | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 77.7 | SEATTLE is 16-26 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 81.9 |
|
DALLAS is 25-31 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 | DALLAS is 28-58 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 10-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 85.8 | DALLAS is 15-29 against the money line (-29.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 90.0 | DALLAS is 9-26 against the money line (-33.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 92.6 | DALLAS is 5-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 87.8 | DALLAS is 23-29 against the money line (-19.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 87.1 | SEATTLE is 114-69 against the money line (+61.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | SEATTLE is 215-171 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 73.6 | SEATTLE is 124-63 against the money line (+58.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 73.0 | SEATTLE is 127-100 against the money line (+27.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 74.3 | SEATTLE is 220-162 against the money line (+37.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 82.4 | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 88.4, OPPONENT 80.4 | SEATTLE is 29-16 against the money line (+17.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 91.3, OPPONENT 84.8 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 10-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 92.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 56-77 against the money line (-40.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 57-83 against the money line (-42.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 21-28 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 62-91 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-29 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 54-81 against the money line (-44.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 17-25 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 62-89 against the money line (-45.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 89.0, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 64-90 against the money line (-44.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 58-74 against the money line (-41.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-26 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 61-91 against the money line (-47.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-29 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 54-83 against the money line (-44.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 38-63 against the money line (-34.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-22 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 142-98 against the money line (+35.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 166-122 against the money line (+34.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 244-184 against the money line (+43.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 200-171 against the money line (+22.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 169-137 against the money line (+38.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 241-202 against the money line (+42.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 68-57 against the money line (+21.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 106-84 against the money line (+44.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 109-55 against the money line (+31.1 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 273-224 against the money line (+36.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 141-80 against the money line (+29.5 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 139-78 against the money line (+40.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 136-100 against the money line (+36.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 190-149 against the money line (+25.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 190-152 against the money line (+31.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 285-230 against the money line (+32.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 148-104 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus terrible teams - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 89.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+5.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 80-47 against the money line (+24.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 204-181 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-13 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 14-8 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 38-38 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 12-11 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 26-33 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 27-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 17-22 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 22-47 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 5-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) off an upset win as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 34-51 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-28 against the money line (-18.5 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-40 against the money line (-26.1 Units) off a home win since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-28 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-24 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-5.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 75.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 12-23 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 22-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 80-112 against the money line (-44.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 50-79 against the money line (-43.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 41-65 against the money line (-34.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-22 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-74 against the money line (-33.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 33-53 against the money line (-24.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-28 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 18-25 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 22-29 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 78-105 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 86-124 against the money line (-58.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-21 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-48 against the money line (-24.7 Units) after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-16 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 59-87 against the money line (-41.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 87-124 against the money line (-54.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 65-98 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 50-75 against the money line (-37.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 43-59 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 64-94 against the money line (-42.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was DALLAS 74.6, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-16 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 45-72 against the money line (-42.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 22-40 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.6, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 311-122 against the money line (+43.8 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 211-114 against the money line (+29.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 277-245 against the money line (+27.2 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 180-143 against the money line (+39.6 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 28-11 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 127-68 against the money line (+26.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 59-25 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 220-176 against the money line (+45.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 93-40 against the money line (+25.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 186-139 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-13 | -6.9 | 7-10 | 11-6 | 80.5 | 40.4 | 43.5% | 43.8 | 87.1 | 41.6 | 45.1% | 41.6 | | Road Games | 2-8 | -5.4 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 79.2 | 41.4 | 43.9% | 43.9 | 86.2 | 41.6 | 45.0% | 39.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.3 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 79.4 | 38.4 | 42.8% | 42.0 | 90.0 | 45.4 | 47.2% | 39.4 | | Division Games | 3-6 | +0.5 | 4-5 | 8-1 | 85.1 | 42.1 | 45.5% | 45.1 | 89.4 | 41.3 | 45.7% | 39.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.5 | 40.4 | 31-70 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 31.1% | 14-17 | 82.6% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.4 | 40.3 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 8-23 | 33.2% | 15-18 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.2 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 13-15 | 81.3% | 44 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.1 | 41.6 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 10 | 23 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.4 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.2 | 41.6 | 31-69 | 45.0% | 8-21 | 36.5% | 16-20 | 81.3% | 40 | 9 | 23 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-6 | +3.5 | 11-6 | 7-10 | 82.8 | 40.8 | 43.1% | 44.1 | 78.5 | 38.9 | 42.0% | 42.8 | | Home Games | 6-1 | +2.7 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 84.6 | 45.6 | 44.6% | 45.1 | 73.4 | 38.7 | 39.7% | 44.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.8 | 40.0 | 44.5% | 38.4 | 80.6 | 40.8 | 46.9% | 41.4 | | Division Games | 4-5 | -2.5 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 81.4 | 40.6 | 41.1% | 46.3 | 82.1 | 40.2 | 43.4% | 42.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.8 | 40.8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 6-20 | 30.7% | 15-18 | 81.6% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.6 | 45.6 | 32-72 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 81.2% | 45 | 10 | 22 | 16 | 9 | 12 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 38.9 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 9-25 | 35.3% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.4 | 38.7 | 28-69 | 39.7% | 6-20 | 28.2% | 13-17 | 74.6% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.3, SEATTLE 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 78-83 | L | +210 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | | 5/25/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 107-92 | W | +155 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 19 | | 5/26/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-83 | W | +145 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | | 5/31/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-74 | L | +300 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | | 6/2/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-87 | L | +210 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | | 6/5/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 81-95 | L | +325 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 12 | | 6/7/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | -175 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | PHOENIX | 90-97 | L | -105 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 21 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 46 | 20 | | 6/13/2024 | SEATTLE | 84-92 | L | +200 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | | 6/15/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 67-85 | L | +210 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | | 6/17/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-90 | L | | 35-73 | 47.9% | 44 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 34 | 7 | | 6/20/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 72-83 | L | +200 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 40 | 15 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/22/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 69-97 | L | -155 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 21 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 43 | 13 | | 6/23/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-92 | L | -105 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 14 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 33 | 12 | | 6/27/2024 | MINNESOTA | 94-88 | W | +325 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 43 | 10 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | | 6/29/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/20/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 63-74 | L | +650 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 42 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 47 | 15 | | 5/22/2024 | INDIANA | 85-83 | W | -220 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 47 | 8 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 11 | | 5/25/2024 | WASHINGTON | 101-69 | W | -400 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | | 5/28/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 77-68 | W | -120 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 18 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 41 | 21 | | 5/30/2024 | @ INDIANA | 103-88 | W | -220 | 42-75 | 56.0% | 37 | 7 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 13 | | 6/4/2024 | PHOENIX | 80-62 | W | -210 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 50 | 14 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 46 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-65 | W | +250 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 53 | 12 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 44 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 64-83 | L | -105 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 45 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 46 | 16 | | 6/11/2024 | LOS ANGELES | 95-79 | W | -750 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 54 | 9 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 11 | | 6/13/2024 | @ DALLAS | 92-84 | W | -250 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | | 6/16/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 78-87 | L | -155 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 44 | 9 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 40 | 15 | | 6/19/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | 83-94 | L | +210 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 40 | 15 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 34 | 14 | | 6/23/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 72-61 | W | -120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 43 | 14 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 46 | 14 | | 6/27/2024 | INDIANA | 89-77 | W | -450 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 32 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 51 | 20 | | 6/29/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2024 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 39-28 (-6.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 5-4 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 13-18 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 3-1 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
09/08/2023 | SEATTLE | 91 | 169.5 | Over | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 33 | 8 | 16 | | | DALLAS | 106 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 08/02/2023 | DALLAS | 76 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 53 | 17 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 65 | 167.5 | Under | 33 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 37 | 5 | 18 | 06/17/2023 | SEATTLE | 109 | 165 | SU ATS | 55 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 17-34 | 50.0% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 38 | 8 | 15 | | | DALLAS | 103 | -8 | Over | 47 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 41 | 8 | 10 | 06/13/2024 | SEATTLE | 92 | -6 | SU ATS | 48 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 33 | 7 | 11 | | | DALLAS | 84 | 160.5 | Over | 40 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 36 | 9 | 19 | 05/26/2023 | DALLAS | 95 | -4.5 | SU Over | 52 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 39 | 8 | 13 | | | SEATTLE | 91 | 161 | ATS | 41 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 40 | 9 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Trammell is 10-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 92.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 195-210 against the money line (-63.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 75.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 67-57 against the money line (-39.1 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 3-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 68.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 12-13 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-21 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 31-24 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 23-21 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 24-25 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 95-72 against the money line (-48.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 75.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-42 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 28-21 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Trammell is 27-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 5-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 17-22 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 16-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 6-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 10-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 8-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 20-28 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 19-24 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 15-24 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 12-23 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 22-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 16-22 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 18-25 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 22-29 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 18-21 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 10-16 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 10-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 11-16 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 1-6 against the money line (-7.7 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 21-28 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 20-29 against the money line (-23.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 17-25 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 6-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 89.0, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-19 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Trammell is 21-28 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-26 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 21-29 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-22 against the money line (-23.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 131-87 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 101-35 against the money line (+18.5 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 76-49 against the money line (+13.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-35 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 37-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 79-52 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 63-43 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 33-20 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 64-36 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 11-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 86-49 against the money line (+29.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 95-53 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 80-43 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 69-35 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 60-32 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 71-37 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 98-61 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 78-48 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 88-49 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-33 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 91-44 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 71-30 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 18-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 10 or more steals as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 65-43 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 102-62 against the money line (+26.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 67-46 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 105-68 against the money line (+20.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 62-44 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 95-65 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 71-47 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 111-71 against the money line (+17.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 64-40 against the money line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 95-59 against the money line (+24.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 57-37 against the money line (+17.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 61-41 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 95-58 against the money line (+25.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 69-47 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 107-69 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 25-11 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 45-18 against the money line (+27.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 52-25 against the money line (+24.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 76-42 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 70-47 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 108-71 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 95-61 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 68-46 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 105-69 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 60-44 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 94-63 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 35-14 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 51-25 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 129 times, while the road underdog won straight up 25 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/2/2024 5:23:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|