| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
WASHINGTON |
|
|
175
| 72
Final
88 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | CHICAGO | +375 | | 608 | WASHINGTON | -550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(227-80 since 1997.) (73.9%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(193-114 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(84-17 since 1997.) (83.2%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(91-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +22.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(75-17 since 1997.) (81.5%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(61-10 since 1997.) (85.9%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(114-45 since 1997.) (71.7%, +37.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(66-24 since 1997.) (73.3%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(63-15 since 1997.) (80.8%, +36.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(80-40 since 1997.) (66.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(62-23 since 1997.) (72.9%, +35.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(91-43 since 1997.) (67.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(53-11 since 1997.) (82.8%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(28-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.3%, +25 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(53-18 since 1997.) (74.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(43-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.7%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(168-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(35-6 since 1997.) (85.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off a home blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(35-6 since 1997.) (85.4%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(37-10 since 1997.) (78.7%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(56-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +12.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(27-16 since 1997.) (62.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +27.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(24-10 since 1997.) (70.6%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(48-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(65-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(80-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%).
(36-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +39.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(134-101 since 1997.) (57%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games.
(44-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +31.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +31.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games.
(67-58 since 1997.) (53.6%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(79-67 since 1997.) (54.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(79-47 since 1997.) (62.7%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game.
(33-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +36.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(36-9 since 1997.) (80%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(61-44 since 1997.) (58.1%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +28.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +28.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(20-5 since 1997.) (80%, +28.4 units. Rating = 6*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +26.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +26.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +26.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent off a home loss.
(27-16 since 1997.) (62.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(51-31 since 1997.) (62.2%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher.
(32-15 since 1997.) (68.1%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(60-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (46.9%, +58.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 15 points or more.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(84-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.5%, +63.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 79 | | 29-66 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 37.8% | 13-17 | 80.5% | 39 | 10 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 90 | | 33-71 | 46.0% | 9-23 | 37.3% | 16-19 | 85.4% | 44 | 13 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 795 times, while CHICAGO won 190 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 64-40 against the money line (+26.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 78.7 | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.2, OPPONENT 87.8 | CHICAGO is 21-17 against the money line (+22.8 Units) in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 138-73 against the money line (+86.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 82.6 | WASHINGTON is 38-105 against the money line (-75.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 3-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 82.5 | WASHINGTON is 77-120 against the money line (-50.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 52-65 against the money line (-35.8 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 81.5 | WASHINGTON is 31-90 against the money line (-55.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 12-24 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 89.1 | WASHINGTON is 95-103 against the money line (-40.8 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 13-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
CHICAGO is 117-168 against the money line (-68.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 81.1 | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 90.2 | CHICAGO is 29-53 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 22-51 against the money line (-29.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 91.3 | CHICAGO is 7-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 94.2 | CHICAGO is 73-112 against the money line (-55.2 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 4-14 against the money line (-11.6 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 88.1 | CHICAGO is 36-72 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 1-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 90.3 | CHICAGO is 14-32 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 87.6 | WASHINGTON is 13-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.8, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 11-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.7, OPPONENT 83.1 | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 90.8, OPPONENT 83.8 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 145-163 against the money line (-64.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-95 against the money line (-53.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 83-158 against the money line (-72.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-217 against the money line (-62.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-6.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 91.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-60 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-20 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-119 against the money line (-44.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 68-77 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-21 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 160-237 against the money line (-79.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-25 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 220-324 against the money line (-106.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-9 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-63 against the money line (-32.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-88 against the money line (-36.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-28 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 14-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-44 against the money line (-33.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 85-143 against the money line (-62.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 47-72 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 70-112 against the money line (-58.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 59-99 against the money line (-41.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-142 against the money line (-67.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 88-146 against the money line (-60.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-69 against the money line (-44.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 49-62 against the money line (-34.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 59-92 against the money line (-38.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 8-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 290-419 against the money line (-120.9 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 170-185 against the money line (-76.0 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 119-130 against the money line (-47.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 114-124 against the money line (-55.7 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-16 against the money line (-16.1 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 172-249 against the money line (-99.0 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-218 against the money line (-82.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-46 against the money line (-28.7 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-4 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 62-101 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 106-153 against the money line (-54.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-150 against the money line (-60.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 12-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 83-133 against the money line (-50.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 133-215 against the money line (-71.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-59 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-142 against the money line (-49.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-27 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-66 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-50 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 70-72 against the money line (-37.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 78-101 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 55-61 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-14 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-225 against the money line (-73.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 152-248 against the money line (-70.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 50-69 against the money line (-34.5 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-65 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 35-47 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-39 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-25 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 18-32 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-25 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-64 against the money line (-28.8 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 112-159 against the money line (-51.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 32-70 against the money line (-38.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 89-128 against the money line (-47.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 78-101 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 55-81 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 83-125 against the money line (-47.0 Units) after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 26-55 against the money line (-31.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 95-137 against the money line (-45.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-9 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-12 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 7-13 | -1.5 | 8-10 | 12-8 | 80.9 | 39.7 | 43.2% | 41.4 | 88.2 | 45.4 | 46.3% | 43.8 | | Road Games | 2-7 | -3.5 | 4-5 | 5-4 | 80.4 | 42.0 | 43.2% | 40.4 | 89.7 | 46.1 | 47.9% | 42.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 82.0 | 45.0 | 42.6% | 42.2 | 90.0 | 46.4 | 45.2% | 46.0 | | Division Games | 4-5 | +0.1 | 4-5 | 6-3 | 80.4 | 37.1 | 43.6% | 41.6 | 87.6 | 45.3 | 45.1% | 44.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.9 | 39.7 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 7-19 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 80.6% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.4 | 42.0 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 8-21 | 36.6% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 88.2 | 45.4 | 33-72 | 46.3% | 7-18 | 35.9% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 44 | 11 | 22 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 89.7 | 46.1 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 81.9% | 43 | 11 | 22 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-8 | +3.9 | 10-9 | 11-9 | 84.7 | 42.9 | 44.6% | 38.2 | 82.7 | 41.7 | 46.1% | 41.1 | | Home Games | 7-5 | -1.2 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 82.2 | 39.8 | 43.2% | 37.8 | 80.8 | 42.1 | 45.9% | 43.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.9 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 84.6 | 40.6 | 42.4% | 38.8 | 85.6 | 43.6 | 47.2% | 39.2 | | Division Games | 8-2 | +6 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 86.2 | 47.8 | 44.3% | 38.6 | 80.5 | 41.6 | 44.8% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.7 | 42.9 | 30-67 | 44.6% | 8-23 | 35.8% | 16-19 | 85.0% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.2 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 8-25 | 33.4% | 14-16 | 87.2% | 38 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.7 | 30-66 | 46.1% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 15-19 | 81.0% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.8 | 42.1 | 30-66 | 45.9% | 6-17 | 36.7% | 14-18 | 77.7% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.9, WASHINGTON 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/3/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 95-90 | W | -210 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 53 | 13 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 38 | 15 | | 6/8/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 79-96 | L | +350 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 32 | 13 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 36 | 9 | | 6/10/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-77 | L | | 21-74 | 28.4% | 41 | 7 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 49 | 13 | | 6/12/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 85-96 | L | +400 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 9 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/17/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | +325 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 46 | 9 | | 6/19/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 60-88 | L | +350 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | | 6/22/2018 | WASHINGTON | 77-93 | L | +180 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | | 6/24/2018 | PHOENIX | 97-88 | W | +220 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 39 | 15 | | 6/27/2018 | ATLANTA | 93-80 | W | -125 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 43 | 16 | | 6/29/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 103-99 | W | +145 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 34 | 13 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 38 | 11 | | 7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 94-97 | L | -155 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 48 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 13 | | 7/3/2018 | @ DALLAS | 85-108 | L | +210 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | | 7/5/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-84 | L | +170 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 16 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 50 | 9 | | 7/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 77-63 | W | +300 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 14 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | | 7/10/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 74-98 | L | -175 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 49 | 14 | | 7/13/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-88 | L | +210 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | | 6/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 80-88 | L | +155 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 27 | 11 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 17 | | 6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-91 | W | +325 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | L | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | W | -500 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 92-80 | W | -165 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | 80-77 | W | -450 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 10 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 15 | | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | 74-84 | L | -165 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 7 | | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | 86-67 | W | -400 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 10 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 43 | 15 | | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | +200 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 13 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 91-97 | L | +200 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | 89-106 | L | -330 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 41-68 | 60.3% | 36 | 10 | | 7/13/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2018 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 27-22 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-3 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 13-11 (-3.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-1 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/22/2018 | WASHINGTON | 93 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 64 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 37 | 7 | 19 | | | CHICAGO | 77 | 169 | Over | 39 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 40 | 5 | 19 | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 60 | 168.5 | Under | 32 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 44 | 14 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 88 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 50 | 15 | 12 | 6/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | 97 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 61 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 45 | 13 | 9 | | | CHICAGO | 63 | 172.5 | Under | 34 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 7 | 21 | 5/26/2017 | CHICAGO | 79 | 161.5 | Over | 38 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 40 | 3 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 88 | -8 | SU ATS | 47 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 11 | 9 | 5/24/2017 | WASHINGTON | 82 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 48 | 15 | 7 | | | CHICAGO | 67 | 164.5 | Under | 41 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 51 | 13 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
Stocks is 8-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 5-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 30-33 against the money line (-18.6 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-22 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 34-40 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-44 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 13-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-28 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 7-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 22-29 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-39 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 8-19 against the money line (-13.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 44-59 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 41-40 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 48-66 against the money line (-19.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 23-39 against the money line (-23.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 21-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 43-54 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-59 against the money line (-29.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 24-32 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 13-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-24 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 2-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 66-62 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 62-55 against the money line (+7.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 54-51 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-10 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 81.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-24 against the money line (+16.1 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 24-21 against the money line (+13.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 53-51 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-36 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-35 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-16 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 60-52 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-4 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 80.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 53-44 against the money line (+18.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 128-111 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 53-45 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 19-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 69 times, while the road underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/05/2018 - Jamierra Faulkner is out for season ( ACL ) | |
| [C] 05/19/2018 - Emma Meesseman is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/17/2024 9:44:36 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|