|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (145-41 since 1997.) (78%, +61.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (138-38 since 1997.) (78.4%, +60.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (219-161 since 1997.) (57.6%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (122-30 since 1997.) (80.3%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (122-71 since 1997.) (63.2%, +58 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (168-126 since 1997.) (57.1%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games. (77-62 since 1997.) (55.4%, +56.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (143-42 since 1997.) (77.3%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game. (116-112 since 1997.) (50.9%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (112-85 since 1997.) (56.9%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (99-54 since 1997.) (64.7%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (121-76 since 1997.) (61.4%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (113-68 since 1997.) (62.4%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (19-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +19 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (137-95 since 1997.) (59.1%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (103-59 since 1997.) (63.6%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (132-92 since 1997.) (58.9%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (117-77 since 1997.) (60.3%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (124-82 since 1997.) (60.2%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (101-62 since 1997.) (62%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (121-82 since 1997.) (59.6%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (99-60 since 1997.) (62.3%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (105-67 since 1997.) (61%, +40.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more. (102-67 since 1997.) (60.4%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games. (53-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game. (56-13 since 1997.) (81.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 4*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (85-47 since 1997.) (64.4%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (101-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more. (78-43 since 1997.) (64.5%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (57-34 since 1997.) (62.6%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (81-46 since 1997.) (63.8%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (84-53 since 1997.) (61.3%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (71-47 since 1997.) (60.2%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (95-64 since 1997.) (59.7%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (62-38 since 1997.) (62%, +35.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (86-53 since 1997.) (61.9%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (108-75 since 1997.) (59%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, vs. division opponents. (41-4 since 1997.) (91.1%, +34.6 units. Rating = 5*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (88-52 since 1997.) (62.9%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (90-56 since 1997.) (61.6%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (96-62 since 1997.) (60.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (109-73 since 1997.) (59.9%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (23-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.5%, +21.1 units. Rating = 4*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (85-52 since 1997.) (62%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in June games. (101-70 since 1997.) (59.1%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (89-59 since 1997.) (60.1%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (92-60 since 1997.) (60.5%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (85-56 since 1997.) (60.3%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (61-17 since 1997.) (78.2%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (80-49 since 1997.) (62%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (68-38 since 1997.) (64.2%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (66-34 since 1997.) (66%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (71-42 since 1997.) (62.8%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (93-64 since 1997.) (59.2%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +29.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (66-42 since 1997.) (61.1%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-26 since 1997.) (67.1%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (74-44 since 1997.) (62.7%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (45-12 since 1997.) (78.9%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more. (55-31 since 1997.) (64%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (56-32 since 1997.) (63.6%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game. (58-32 since 1997.) (64.4%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (67-40 since 1997.) (62.6%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games. (63-39 since 1997.) (61.8%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (52-27 since 1997.) (65.8%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (65-38 since 1997.) (63.1%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (64-38 since 1997.) (62.7%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (53-29 since 1997.) (64.6%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game, in May, June, or July games. (38-9 since 1997.) (80.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (51-29 since 1997.) (63.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (47-24 since 1997.) (66.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (53-29 since 1997.) (64.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, playing with 3 or more days rest. (37-18 since 1997.) (67.3%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, playing with 3 or more days rest. (36-18 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (40-18 since 1997.) (69%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (35-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.5%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (49-29 since 1997.) (62.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game. (25-2 since 1997.) (92.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 4*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (73-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (27-12 since 1997.) (69.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, in May, June, or July games. (42-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (39-17 since 1997.) (69.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an embarrassing upset loss by 20 points or more as a favorite, in June games. (19-8 since 1997.) (70.4%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, on Thursday nights. (32-10 since 1997.) (76.2%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (42-22 since 1997.) (65.6%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (42-22 since 1997.) (65.6%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (20-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a favorite against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points. (26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (34-6 since 1997.) (85%, +20.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (22-3 since 1997.) (88%, +20.4 units. Rating = 4*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (27-8 since 1997.) (77.1%, +19.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +17 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (35-14 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (30-12 since 1997.) (71.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (44-25 since 1997.) (63.8%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more. (19-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +14.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (42-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more. (54-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, in May, June, or July games. (27-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) |