Login  | Free Registration
No current race.

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : Money Line Matchup
Tuesday 9/28/2021Line$ LineOU LineScore
CHICAGO
 
CONNECTICUT
+7.5  

-7.5  
+250

-330

154
 
101
Final
95

CHICAGO (18 - 16) at CONNECTICUT (26 - 6)
No Previous GameView Next Game
Tuesday, 9/28/2021 8:00 PM
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1
Board Money Line
613CHICAGO+250
614CONNECTICUT-330
BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

CHICAGO (Money)

(52%)

OVER

(18%)
CONNECTICUT (Money) (48%)UNDER (82%)
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring CONNECTICUT against the money line
There are 95 situations with a total rating of 232 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(186-60 since 1997.) (75.6%, +84.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(161-29 since 1997.) (84.7%, +81 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(162-30 since 1997.) (84.4%, +81 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(165-37 since 1997.) (81.7%, +80.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(226-57 since 1997.) (79.9%, +77.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(251-90 since 1997.) (73.6%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(77-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.7%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(139-29 since 1997.) (82.7%, +67.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(153-47 since 1997.) (76.5%, +66.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(160-51 since 1997.) (75.8%, +66.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(42-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(64-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +38.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(82-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(113-21 since 1997.) (84.3%, +64.8 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(118-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(124-37 since 1997.) (77%, +64 units. Rating = 4*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(104-18 since 1997.) (85.2%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(145-37 since 1997.) (79.7%, +55 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(86-8 since 1997.) (91.5%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(86-8 since 1997.) (91.5%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(104-38 since 1997.) (73.2%, +54.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(136-48 since 1997.) (73.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(97-16 since 1997.) (85.8%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having won 3 of their last 4 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(132-42 since 1997.) (75.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-4 since 1997.) (94.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-4 since 1997.) (94.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(155-78 since 1997.) (66.5%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(122-31 since 1997.) (79.7%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, in August or September games.
(85-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(85-17 since 1997.) (83.3%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(109-30 since 1997.) (78.4%, +50.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(97-18 since 1997.) (84.3%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(90-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, in August or September games.
(64-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(41-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.1%, +36.3 units. Rating = 6*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(99-27 since 1997.) (78.6%, +48.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(135-59 since 1997.) (69.6%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(109-29 since 1997.) (79%, +45 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(143-95 since 1997.) (60.1%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games.
(55-5 since 1997.) (91.7%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in the conference finals.
(95-30 since 1997.) (76%, +42 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(51-4 since 1997.) (92.7%, +41.6 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, in August or September games.
(55-6 since 1997.) (90.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 4*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(51-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +41.2 units. Rating = 6*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(47-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (94%, +40.8 units. Rating = 5*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games.
(149-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +34.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(58-6 since 1997.) (90.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(58-6 since 1997.) (90.6%, +37.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, in August or September games.
(35-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +30.5 units. Rating = 6*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(46-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(79-31 since 1997.) (71.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games.
(47-7 since 1997.) (87%, +36 units. Rating = 4*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(63-27 since 1997.) (70%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - as a # 1 seed in the playoffs, in the conference finals.
(56-10 since 1997.) (84.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +22 units. Rating = 4*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%).
(66-20 since 1997.) (76.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(52-10 since 1997.) (83.9%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(33-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +25 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(37-2 since 1997.) (94.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(21-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(39-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (83%, +29.3 units. Rating = 4*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) after 15 or more games.
(40-5 since 1997.) (88.9%, +30 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(34-2 since 1997.) (94.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(34-2 since 1997.) (94.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(46-13 since 1997.) (78%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(61-34 since 1997.) (64.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog.
(47-13 since 1997.) (78.3%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent free throw shooting teams (>=80%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +25.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more.
(25-2 since 1997.) (92.6%, +22 units. Rating = 3*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(27-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, in August or September games.
(56-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +34 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent FT shooting teams (>=80%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(42-21 since 1997.) (66.7%, +18.6 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +18.3 units. Rating = 0*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(43-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(42-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(37-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two excellent free throw shooting teams (>=80%), red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +13.7 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, in August or September games.
(80-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(37-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(47-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +19.5 units. Rating = 1*)
- Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(35-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(29-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 consecutive home wins by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(46-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (78%, +17.6 units. Rating = 0*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(58-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +15.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(75-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line
There are 10 situations with a total rating of 24 stars.
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(88-66 since 1997.) (57.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(69-53 since 1997.) (56.6%, +40.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(62-43 since 1997.) (59%, +34 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(125-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +58.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, on Tuesday nights.
(41-32 since 1997.) (56.2%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent.
(30-14 since 1997.) (68.2%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(100-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(53-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*)
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a road favorite.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*)
- Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
CHICAGO76 29-6644.3%7-2132.5%11-1383.7%37614
CONNECTICUT83 30-6844.4%7-2035.2%16-1983.7%461115

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.
In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 675 times, while CHICAGO won 304 times.
No Edge.

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 77.9
CHICAGO is 49-49 against the money line (+27.0 Units) in road games when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.9
CHICAGO is 14-7 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 77.8

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
CHICAGO is 164-211 against the money line (-70.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 82.1
CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 83.4
CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 84.6
CHICAGO is 23-52 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 81.3
CHICAGO is 9-11 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.9
CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.8
CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 82.6
CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 88.0
CHICAGO is 4-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.7, OPPONENT 92.2
CHICAGO is 34-64 against the money line (-39.4 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 78.0
CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 68.0
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 67.4
CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 70.4
CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.1
CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 70.4
CONNECTICUT is 93-40 against the money line (+44.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.9
CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 67.6
CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 69.0
CONNECTICUT is 71-47 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.7
CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 66.6
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 69.0
CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 71.8
CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 71.8
CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.3

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 9 trends with a total rating of 8 stars.
CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 18-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 83-77 against the money line (+31.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 124-118 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 55-52 against the money line (+24.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 31-35 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 56-56 against the money line (+28.7 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 46 trends with a total rating of 167 stars.
CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-11.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 113-174 against the money line (-65.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 114-148 against the money line (-61.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 18-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 129-180 against the money line (-60.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 40-56 against the money line (-31.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-14 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 20-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 12-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-5 against the money line (+17.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-5 against the money line (+13.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 22-6 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-3 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-4 against the money line (+12.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 6*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 9 trends with a total rating of 11 stars.
CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games on Tuesday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 16-9 against the money line (+19.0 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 27-16 against the money line (+20.3 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 76 trends with a total rating of 252 stars.
CHICAGO is 7-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 3-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*)
CHICAGO is 36-55 against the money line (-34.8 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 10-28 against the money line (-21.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 56-74 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 11-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 0-9 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 69.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 6*)
CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 19-20 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*)
CHICAGO is 14-16 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CHICAGO is 20-32 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 24-5 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-1 against the money line (+17.6 Units) as a favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 30-3 against the money line (+22.5 Units) as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 26-12 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) on Tuesday this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 226-168 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-1 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 straight games outrebounding opponent by 10 or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 52-25 against the money line (+18.3 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 67.7 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 25-8 against the money line (+17.5 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off a home win this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-1 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 8*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 37-21 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 21-3 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 18-3 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 66.7 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 66.8 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.5, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 3*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.2, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 17-1 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 28-7 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 23-6 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*)
CONNECTICUT is 19-2 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 8*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*)
CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*)
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*)
CONNECTICUT is 20-3 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 68.3 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 16-2 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 68.8 - (Rating = 6*)
CONNECTICUT is 13-1 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 7*)
CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 5*)
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 3*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games18-16-8.614-1919-1583.442.444.3%41.681.240.143.1%43.7
Road Games11-6+6.59-77-1083.844.145.1%42.678.438.142.2%42.8
Last 5 Games3-2-1.42-32-381.841.645.1%38.681.844.246.4%41.0
Division Games10-5-5.37-78-783.443.743.5%42.878.338.442.3%43.7
CHICAGO Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)83.442.431-7044.3%7-2133.6%14-1784.7%42822197144
vs opponents surrendering80.640.930-6843.5%7-2134.2%14-1781.0%42819177134
Team Stats (Road Games)83.844.131-6945.1%8-2135.8%14-1782.7%43821197144
Stats Against (All Games)81.240.130-7043.1%7-1935.6%14-1878.0%44919177155
vs opponents averaging80.440.730-6843.3%7-2134.4%14-1780.5%42819177134
Stats Against (Road Games)78.438.129-7042.2%6-1931.0%14-1876.0%43917177155

CONNECTICUT - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games26-6+20.522-912-2079.740.744.4%45.269.934.940.9%34.2
Home Games15-1+13.812-45-1180.439.745.6%44.769.136.641.2%33.1
Last 5 Games5-0+55-01-483.246.443.9%46.662.636.039.0%33.2
Division Games12-3+8.88-68-782.142.345.4%46.971.135.839.9%34.4
CONNECTICUT Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)79.740.729-6644.4%7-2035.7%14-1881.6%451018188144
vs opponents surrendering81.741.530-6943.7%7-2134.7%14-1780.7%43819177134
Team Stats (Home Games)80.439.729-6445.6%6-1835.5%15-1981.1%45918178143
Stats Against (All Games)69.934.926-6240.9%6-2031.0%13-1582.4%34617187135
vs opponents averaging80.640.930-6943.3%7-2134.1%14-1780.6%42819177134
Stats Against (Home Games)69.136.626-6341.2%6-1931.2%11-1384.4%33617197144
Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 71.6,  CONNECTICUT 71.2
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/21/2021MINNESOTA95-101L+12035-7347.9%27934-6354.0%4813
8/24/2021@ ATLANTA86-79W-30034-6651.5%411233-7941.8%447
8/27/2021@ SEATTLE73-69W+20029-6942.0%481825-6836.8%4017
8/29/2021@ SEATTLE107-75W+21041-7356.2%43929-6445.3%2712
8/31/2021@ PHOENIX83-103L-11032-7145.1%361139-7552.0%428
9/2/2021@ LAS VEGAS83-90L+14530-6844.1%361333-7345.2%4912
9/5/2021LAS VEGAS92-84W+10534-6750.7%44730-7341.1%416
9/12/2021WASHINGTON71-79L-40028-6741.8%371429-6048.3%4115
9/17/2021LAS VEGAS70-103L+14528-7040.0%221241-7356.2%5415
9/19/2021INDIANA98-87W-95035-7149.3%431033-6947.8%3715
9/23/2021DALLAS81-64W-22033-7345.2%511225-6936.2%3911
9/26/2021@ MINNESOTA89-76W+15532-6549.2%401629-6743.3%3420
9/28/2021@ CONNECTICUT           
9/30/2021@ CONNECTICUT           
10/3/2021CONNECTICUT           

CONNECTICUT - Season Results Against the Money Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreSUMoneyShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/19/2021MINNESOTA82-71W-30027-5549.1%411728-6642.4%2710
8/24/2021LAS VEGAS76-62W-15530-6744.8%421125-6339.7%3614
8/26/2021LOS ANGELES76-72W-75026-6043.3%411427-5747.4%2915
8/28/2021LOS ANGELES76-61W-60028-5947.5%501820-5337.7%2414
8/31/2021@ WASHINGTON85-75W-55034-6949.3%431525-5545.5%2714
9/7/2021@ DALLAS83-56W-45033-6848.5%521317-6426.6%3812
9/9/2021@ LOS ANGELES75-57W-55023-5244.2%391923-5541.8%2717
9/11/2021@ PHOENIX76-67W-16524-6437.5%35927-5648.2%3615
9/15/2021NEW YORK98-69W-95036-7150.7%462026-6241.9%2928
9/19/2021ATLANTA84-64W-105029-7538.7%611028-7338.4%367
9/28/2021CHICAGO           
9/30/2021CHICAGO           
10/3/2021@ CHICAGO           
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
CONNECTICUT is 30-27 (-11.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
CONNECTICUT is 4-5 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

All games played at CONNECTICUT since 1997
CHICAGO is 10-15 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997
Games played at CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons.
CONNECTICUT is 2-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
6/27/2021CHICAGO58-5 Under3023-6933.3%5-2420.8%7-7100.0%381418
 CONNECTICUT74157.5SU ATS3627-6442.2%6-1442.9%14-1973.7%501318
6/19/2021CONNECTICUT81156 Over3429-6346.0%6-1833.3%17-2085.0%38818
 CHICAGO91-6.5SU ATS4032-6450.0%7-1838.9%20-2195.2%32512
6/17/2021CONNECTICUT75155.5 Over3625-6240.3%4-1330.8%21-2777.8%43814
 CHICAGO81-4.5SU ATS3128-6841.2%5-2321.7%20-2483.3%441012
9/15/2020CONNECTICUT94165.5SU ATS4131-7044.3%5-1729.4%27-2993.1%491712
NCHICAGO81-2 Over4130-6050.0%8-2040.0%13-1681.2%25512
8/14/2020CONNECTICUT77168SU ATS3729-7638.2%5-1533.3%14-2458.3%53128
NCHICAGO74-6 Under2828-6145.9%4-2020.0%14-1782.4%40615
8/8/2020CHICAGO100-3SU ATS5232-5855.2%7-1838.9%29-3290.6%35721
NCONNECTICUT93167 Over4635-6355.6%7-1450.0%16-2176.2%27419
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line
There are 5 trends with a total rating of 3 stars.
Wade is 28-15 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Wade is 17-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Wade is 16-9 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 14-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 18-10 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring CONNECTICUT to win against the money line
There are 91 trends with a total rating of 157 stars.
Wade is 17-20 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 10-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Wade is 28-30 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Wade is 10-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 32-30 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 36-34 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 16-21 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Wade is 37-34 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 26-24 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Wade is 16-20 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 118-81 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 61-25 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 61-25 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 57-25 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 58-29 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 26-12 against the money line (+14.5 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 25-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 63-42 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 37-24 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 44-27 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 77-47 against the money line (+19.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 44-25 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 22-9 against the money line (+20.1 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 13-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after a game with 16 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 61-41 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 41-25 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 31-15 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 23-9 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 18-6 against the money line (+12.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 34-23 against the money line (+10.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 22-5 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 29-8 against the money line (+19.6 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 13-2 against the money line (+14.3 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 6*)
Miller is 46-17 against the money line (+22.8 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 22-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 48-22 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 20-8 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 30-14 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 2 straight blowout wins by 15 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 102-64 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 94-58 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 82-56 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 93-61 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 75-45 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 59-36 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 79-37 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 62-21 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 49-15 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 49-19 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 26-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 56-29 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 30-14 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 65-44 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 39-19 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 23-8 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 5*)
Miller is 13-6 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 77-41 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 51-24 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 52-49 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 33-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 46-29 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 60-47 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 59-24 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 84-45 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 63-27 against the money line (+25.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 88-48 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 57-32 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 72-47 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 32-22 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 43-36 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Miller is 73-38 against the money line (+32.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 102-63 against the money line (+25.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 70-34 against the money line (+36.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*)
Miller is 97-56 against the money line (+35.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 48-21 against the money line (+37.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*)
Miller is 63-36 against the money line (+34.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 54-23 against the money line (+27.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 79-40 against the money line (+25.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 65-33 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 96-57 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 74-38 against the money line (+33.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 103-65 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 62-33 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 88-56 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 69-38 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 97-63 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 60-36 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Miller is 80-59 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Miller is 54-30 against the money line (+31.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*)
Miller is 72-48 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening Money Line: Home=-300 (Road=+220), Closing Money Line: Home=-330 (Road=+250)
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 187 times, while the road underdog won straight up 56 times. No Edge.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
CHICAGO
[F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension )
CONNECTICUT
[F] 09/27/2021 - DeWanna Bonner is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Chicago Sky ( Back )

Last Updated: 12/6/2021 6:49:11 AM EST


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.