| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LAS VEGAS
CONNECTICUT |
|
|
163
| 78
Final
71 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 4 - LV leads 2-1 | | |  | |
| 605 | LAS VEGAS | -110 | | 606 | CONNECTICUT | -110 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(343-130 since 1997.) (72.5%, +86.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(176-35 since 1997.) (83.4%, +78.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(175-34 since 1997.) (83.7%, +78.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(130-83 since 1997.) (61%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(82-18 since 1997.) (82%, +36.2 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, on Sunday games.
(83-22 since 1997.) (79%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(43-40 since 1997.) (51.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(93-75 since 1997.) (55.4%, +27.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(32-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win by 10 points or more, on Sunday games.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +7.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +12 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(36-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +10.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(45-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +8.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +13 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(36-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(69-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.7%, +4.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - after one or more consecutive overs, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +12.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(63-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.4%, +4.4 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(343-130 since 1997.) (72.5%, +86.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(145-103 since 1997.) (58.5%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(118-78 since 1997.) (60.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(134-97 since 1997.) (58%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(60-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(75-49 since 1997.) (60.5%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LAS VEGAS) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +10.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(79-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +10.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(36-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| LAS VEGAS | 85 | | 32-68 | 46.4% | 10-26 | 36.1% | 12-14 | 83.9% | 38 | 6 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 86 | | 33-72 | 45.9% | 6-16 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 78.3% | 46 | 11 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 528 times, while LAS VEGAS won 445 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LAS VEGAS is 99-40 against the money line (+84.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.1, OPPONENT 77.6 | LAS VEGAS is 25-5 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.9, OPPONENT 81.6 | LAS VEGAS is 13-0 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 95.9, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 54-76 against the money line (-68.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 5-6 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.4, OPPONENT 84.9 | CONNECTICUT is 13-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-20.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 85.9 | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 87.7 | CONNECTICUT is 4-11 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 15-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 |
|
LAS VEGAS is 188-209 against the money line (-77.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.1, OPPONENT 81.3 | LAS VEGAS is 58-92 against the money line (-45.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.4, OPPONENT 81.2 | LAS VEGAS is 4-6 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 89.5 | LAS VEGAS is 61-97 against the money line (-40.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.4, OPPONENT 77.3 | LAS VEGAS is 16-11 against the money line (-24.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.7, OPPONENT 90.0 | LAS VEGAS is 11-10 against the money line (-25.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.4, OPPONENT 93.1 | LAS VEGAS is 115-149 against the money line (-53.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.7, OPPONENT 78.4 | LAS VEGAS is 79-106 against the money line (-53.8 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.5, OPPONENT 76.5 | LAS VEGAS is 4-6 against the money line (-25.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 86.3 | CONNECTICUT is 53-28 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 104-48 against the money line (+45.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 93-54 against the money line (+35.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 75.7 | CONNECTICUT is 99-51 against the money line (+30.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | CONNECTICUT is 44-17 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 77.8 | CONNECTICUT is 18-4 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.8, OPPONENT 79.6 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-7 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 83-127 against the money line (-47.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-10 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 20-11 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 180-197 against the money line (-71.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 127-159 against the money line (-65.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 231-245 against the money line (-72.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 181-218 against the money line (-69.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 255-297 against the money line (-83.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 6-5 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 24-15 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.7, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 20-38 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 37-60 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-32 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 80-114 against the money line (-42.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-42 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 54-29 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 185-119 against the money line (+35.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 257-168 against the money line (+35.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-15 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-22 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 119-86 against the money line (+30.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 164-125 against the money line (+23.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 8-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in road games when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 15-2 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 17-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.3, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-1 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 92.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 23-6 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 42-31 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 18-20 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 9-7 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in road games revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 37-13 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 94.4, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when attempting to close out a playoff series over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-6 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in home games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-28 against the money line (-26.7 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 309-373 against the money line (-111.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 113-143 against the money line (-53.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-8 against the money line (-22.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 49-80 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-26 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 55% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 11-8 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 28-44 against the money line (-39.2 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 149-182 against the money line (-56.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 4-6 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 92.4, OPPONENT 97.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-7 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 23-30 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 12-26 against the money line (-20.3 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 14-8 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 13-9 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 15-37 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 72.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 155-165 against the money line (-71.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 107-118 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 38-21 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 30-17 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 30-17 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 146-170 against the money line (-55.3 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 75.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 3-7 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 73.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 7-6 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-14 against the money line (+20.8 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 113-46 against the money line (+30.0 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-19 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-7 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 83-52 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 45-25 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-15 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 98-64 against the money line (+27.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 44-18 against the money line (+16.7 Units) in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-2 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 47-17 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-2 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-15 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-16 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-1 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 8*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 34-12 | -14.2 | 23-23 | 24-22 | 89.8 | 46.1 | 46.5% | 41.9 | 83.3 | 40.5 | 43.5% | 42.3 | | Road Games | 16-6 | +2.6 | 13-9 | 12-10 | 89.6 | 46.1 | 47.1% | 42.6 | 84.2 | 38.5 | 42.9% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 42.6 | 49.4% | 38.4 | 86.0 | 43.0 | 45.9% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 89.8 | 46.1 | 32-69 | 46.5% | 10-26 | 36.6% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 8-22 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 89.6 | 46.1 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 9-26 | 35.8% | 14-18 | 82.2% | 43 | 7 | 21 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.3 | 40.5 | 31-71 | 43.5% | 9-25 | 34.6% | 13-16 | 78.4% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.2 | 38.5 | 31-72 | 42.9% | 9-25 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 31-16 | -5.2 | 27-19 | 23-24 | 84.4 | 42.6 | 45.8% | 45.8 | 76.8 | 38.9 | 43.6% | 36.1 | | Home Games | 16-7 | -9.4 | 12-10 | 10-13 | 86.2 | 43.3 | 46.7% | 47.4 | 76.9 | 38.2 | 42.7% | 35.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 83.2 | 45.2 | 48.0% | 45.0 | 74.2 | 40.4 | 43.5% | 33.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.4 | 42.6 | 32-69 | 45.8% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 46 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 44.4% | 8-22 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.2 | 43.3 | 33-70 | 46.7% | 6-17 | 36.9% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 47 | 11 | 22 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 38.9 | 28-65 | 43.6% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 13-16 | 79.0% | 36 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.9 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 42.7% | 8-24 | 33.6% | 12-15 | 78.5% | 36 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LAS VEGAS 71.9, CONNECTICUT 70 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/9/2022 | ATLANTA | 97-90 | W | -950 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 37 | 10 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 34 | 10 | | 8/11/2022 | CHICAGO | 89-78 | W | -120 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 33 | 9 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 17 | | 8/14/2022 | SEATTLE | 109-100 | W | -270 | 39-70 | 55.7% | 35 | 10 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 45 | 18 | | 8/17/2022 | PHOENIX | 79-63 | W | | 26-64 | 40.6% | 48 | 10 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 46 | 9 | | 8/20/2022 | PHOENIX | 117-80 | W | | 41-64 | 64.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 37 | 13 | | 8/28/2022 | SEATTLE | 73-76 | L | -220 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 39 | 11 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 47 | 7 | | 8/31/2022 | SEATTLE | 78-73 | W | -250 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 8 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 38 | 5 | | 9/4/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 110-98 | W | -105 | 44-84 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 38-79 | 48.1% | 39 | 8 | | 9/6/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 97-92 | W | +100 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 37 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | | 9/11/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 67-64 | W | -250 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 40 | 10 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 7 | | 9/13/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 85-71 | W | -200 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 38 | 7 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 41 | 8 | | 9/15/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-105 | L | -105 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 29 | 14 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 44 | 9 | | 9/18/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/9/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 97-71 | W | -400 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 18 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 27 | 20 | | 8/11/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 93-69 | W | -650 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 51 | 19 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 31 | 17 | | 8/14/2022 | MINNESOTA | 90-83 | W | -250 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 45 | 9 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 34 | 12 | | 8/18/2022 | DALLAS | 93-68 | W | -500 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 45 | 9 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 37 | 15 | | 8/21/2022 | DALLAS | 79-89 | L | -750 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 10 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 40 | 8 | | 8/24/2022 | @ DALLAS | 73-58 | W | -270 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 55 | 13 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 39 | 19 | | 8/28/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 68-63 | W | +155 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 54 | 9 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 41 | 11 | | 8/31/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 77-85 | L | +180 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 46 | 12 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 38 | 12 | | 9/4/2022 | CHICAGO | 72-76 | L | -110 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 53 | 17 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 42 | 8 | | 9/6/2022 | CHICAGO | 104-80 | W | -120 | 41-72 | 56.9% | 45 | 13 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 27 | 15 | | 9/8/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 72-63 | W | +155 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 49 | 23 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 34 | 13 | | 9/11/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 64-67 | L | +200 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 7 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 40 | 10 | | 9/13/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 71-85 | L | +170 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 41 | 8 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 38 | 7 | | 9/15/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 105-76 | W | -115 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 44 | 9 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 29 | 14 | | 9/18/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 33-24 (+11.5 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 7-9 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 17-7 (+6.1 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-2 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/15/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 76 | 160.5 | Over | 42 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 29 | 3 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 105 | -1 | SU ATS | 53 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 44 | 10 | 9 | 9/13/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71 | 161.5 | Under | 37 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 41 | 6 | 8 | | | LAS VEGAS | 85 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 6-26 | 23.1% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 38 | 2 | 7 | 9/11/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 64 | 169 | ATS | 38 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 3-5 | 60.0% | 46 | 13 | 7 | | | LAS VEGAS | 67 | -6 | SU Under | 34 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 5-24 | 20.8% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 40 | 6 | 10 | 7/17/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 91 | -4 | SU ATS | 35 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 9-36 | 25.0% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 33 | 10 | 7 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | 174.5 | Under | 37 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 50 | 10 | 22 | 6/2/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 97 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 6 | 9 | | | LAS VEGAS | 90 | -4.5 | Over | 50 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 10-25 | 40.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 40 | 3 | 13 | 5/31/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 167.5 | Over | 42 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 48 | 10 | 14 | | | LAS VEGAS | 89 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 44 | 6 | 14 | 8/24/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 62 | 156 | Under | 32 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 36 | 6 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -3 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 8 | 11 | 6/1/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 67 | -1.5 | Under | 30 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 0-5 | 0.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 33 | 3 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | 160 | SU ATS | 33 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 22-23 | 95.7% | 41 | 8 | 14 | 5/23/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 162 | SU ATS | 27 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 54 | 12 | 8 | | | LAS VEGAS | 65 | -5.5 | Under | 33 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 37 | 1 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Hammon is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 10-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 94.4, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 13-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Hammon is 11-8 against the money line (-22.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hammon is 11-8 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hammon is 4-6 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 92.4, OPPONENT 97.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Hammon is 14-8 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 14-10 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 16-10 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 147-100 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 70-36 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in August or September games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-38 against the money line (+36.9 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 70-41 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 57-34 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-38 against the money line (+36.9 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 27-15 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 72-41 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-22 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 54-40 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 38-21 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-14 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 93-61 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 72-46 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 128-78 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 77-50 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 118-73 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 98-61 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 65-35 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 70-38 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 92-55 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 36-23 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 62-42 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 83-42 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 97-65 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 42-33 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 93-53 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 129-81 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 88-48 against the money line (+29.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 122-73 against the money line (+29.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 57-33 against the money line (+25.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 77-51 against the money line (+21.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 74-37 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-56 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 85-48 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 123-75 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 94-53 against the money line (+21.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 129-83 against the money line (+10.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-26 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 89-53 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 124-81 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 80-50 against the money line (+16.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 105-76 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 67-44 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 91-65 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 23 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 07/27/2022 - Bria Hartley is out for season ( ACL ) | | [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/1/2023 4:52:42 PM EST |
|
|
| |
|