| | | |
GEORGIA TECH First Half Results PITTSBURGH |
|
| 58.5 | 40 Final 29 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
553 | GEORGIA TECH | -3 | 554 | PITTSBURGH | 58.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 9-7 | -3.2 | 7-5 | 4-8 | 66.4 | 31.1 | 43.0% | 35.0 | 63.3 | 27.9 | 40.4% | 32.9 | Road Games | 0-4 | -3.6 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 59.5 | 32.0 | 40.5% | 32.7 | 68.5 | 30.7 | 42.6% | 35.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 4-0 | 0-4 | 66.6 | 30.6 | 42.7% | 37.2 | 59.4 | 27.4 | 38.7% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 2-1 | +2.8 | 3-0 | 0-3 | 61.0 | 28.7 | 39.9% | 37.0 | 58.3 | 23.7 | 37.1% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.4 | 31.1 | 23-54 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 15-22 | 71.2% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.5 | 33.2 | 25-58 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.8% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.5 | 32.0 | 22-55 | 40.5% | 4-16 | 26.6% | 11-16 | 68.3% | 33 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.3 | 27.9 | 23-56 | 40.4% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 11-15 | 69.1% | 33 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.2 | 34.3 | 26-59 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 15-20 | 71.4% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.5 | 30.7 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 8-21 | 39.8% | 13-17 | 72.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-9 | -1.8 | 6-6 | 2-10 | 66.6 | 29.8 | 43.3% | 34.2 | 70.9 | 33.8 | 42.9% | 36.1 | Home Games | 7-4 | +0.2 | 3-3 | 1-5 | 68.6 | 29.3 | 43.5% | 36.2 | 68.6 | 31.5 | 41.0% | 35.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +0.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 57.2 | 24.8 | 38.6% | 32.6 | 74.2 | 37.4 | 48.0% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 0-4 | -1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 55.7 | 25.0 | 38.5% | 28.7 | 78.0 | 40.0 | 51.3% | 34.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.6 | 29.8 | 23-52 | 43.3% | 8-24 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 34 | 7 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.6 | 32.1 | 25-58 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 71.0% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.6 | 29.3 | 22-51 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 16-22 | 72.5% | 36 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 5 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.9 | 33.8 | 26-61 | 42.9% | 7-22 | 32.8% | 11-17 | 64.5% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.5 | 36.4 | 27-60 | 45.7% | 8-21 | 35.3% | 14-20 | 71.4% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.6 | 31.5 | 26-62 | 41.0% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 10-16 | 61.0% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: GEORGIA TECH 73.1, PITTSBURGH 75.8 |
| | |
|
|
11/24/2017 | N TEXAS | 63-49 | W | -16 | L | 138 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 24 | 6 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 31 | 19 | 11/28/2017 | NORTHWESTERN | 52-51 | W | 2.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 16-43 | 37.2% | 35 | 15 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 29 | 6 | 12/1/2017 | GRAMBLING | 63-64 | L | | - | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 32 | 13 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 36 | 18 | 12/3/2017 | TENNESSEE | 70-77 | L | 6.5 | L | 128.5 | O | 21-54 | 38.9% | 36 | 14 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 35 | 14 | 12/6/2017 | @ WOFFORD | 60-63 | L | -3 | L | 131.5 | U | 24-42 | 57.1% | 34 | 16 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 27 | 6 | 12/17/2017 | FLORIDA A&M | 79-54 | W | -22.5 | W | 127 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 45 | 14 | 20-62 | 32.3% | 34 | 18 | 12/19/2017 | @ GEORGIA | 59-80 | L | 5.5 | L | 126.5 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 28 | 11 | 29-50 | 58.0% | 35 | 16 | 12/22/2017 | WRIGHT ST | 81-85 | L | -8 | L | 124 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 18 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 32 | 17 | 12/27/2017 | COPPIN ST | 76-62 | W | | - | | - | 26-56 | 46.4% | 41 | 6 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 24 | 4 | 12/30/2017 | @ NOTRE DAME | 59-68 | L | 14 | W | 139 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 34 | 7 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 11 | 1/3/2018 | MIAMI | 64-54 | W | 5 | W | 126 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 11 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 39 | 18 | 1/6/2018 | YALE | 74-60 | W | -9 | W | 139.5 | U | 23-47 | 48.9% | 34 | 10 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 23 | 12 | 1/10/2018 | NOTRE DAME | 60-53 | W | -2 | W | 125.5 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 39 | 13 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 10 | 1/13/2018 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2018 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/20/2018 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2018 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2018 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2018 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/25/2017 | LEHIGH | 80-68 | W | | - | | - | 26-51 | 51.0% | 33 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 28 | 10 | 11/28/2017 | HIGH POINT | 71-63 | W | | - | | - | 22-40 | 55.0% | 34 | 22 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 30 | 10 | 12/1/2017 | *DUQUESNE | 76-64 | W | -6 | W | 141.5 | U | 30-56 | 53.6% | 33 | 8 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 34 | 11 | 12/5/2017 | MOUNT ST MARYS | 82-78 | W | | - | | - | 26-55 | 47.3% | 43 | 17 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 27 | 13 | 12/9/2017 | W VIRGINIA | 60-69 | L | 15.5 | W | 151.5 | U | 16-47 | 34.0% | 38 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 22 | 12/16/2017 | MCNEESE ST | 72-51 | W | | - | | - | 28-63 | 44.4% | 47 | 11 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 47 | 8 | 12/19/2017 | DELAWARE ST | 74-68 | W | | - | | - | 22-48 | 45.8% | 27 | 12 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 16 | 12/22/2017 | TOWSON ST | 63-59 | W | 4 | W | 137 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 48 | 21 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 34 | 11 | 12/30/2017 | MIAMI | 53-67 | L | 12.5 | L | 133 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 23 | 19 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 31 | 15 | 1/2/2018 | @ LOUISVILLE | 51-77 | L | 17.5 | L | 137 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 29 | 15 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 42 | 10 | 1/6/2018 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 67-81 | L | 16.5 | W | 144.5 | O | 22-48 | 45.8% | 31 | 17 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 26 | 6 | 1/10/2018 | DUKE | 52-87 | L | 20 | L | 156 | U | 17-51 | 33.3% | 32 | 15 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 39 | 6 | 1/13/2018 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2018 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/20/2018 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2018 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2018 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2018 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2018 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | GEORGIA TECH: Last season: 21-16, lost in final of NIT.
Who's gone: G Josh Heath, F Quinton Stephens, G Corey Heyward, F Christian Matthews, F Kellen McCormick, G/F Jodan Price, F Rand Rowland.
Who's back: G Josh Okogie is coming off a brilliant freshman season in which he averaged 16.1 points and 5.4 rebounds per game. C Ben Lammers (14.2 ppg, 9.2 rpg) and guard Tadric Jackson (12.1 ppg) provide senior leadership. G Justin Moore, who started 18 games, figures to play a much bigger role in his sophomore year.
Who's new: Pastner whiffed on several high-profile prospects but landed four recruits. F Curtis Haywood II, G Jose Alvarado, F Moses Wright and F Evan Cole will all get a shot at significant playing time. Ditto for G Brandon Alston, who came aboard as a graduate transfer after playing two seasons at Lehigh.
The Skinny: After a much-better-than-expected showing in Pastner's first season, the Yellow Jackets return their top three scorers and facing greater expectations. But it may be a little soon to expect a run at the NCAA Tournament. Pastner has yet to land a top-notch recruiting class and said all along that turning Georgia Tech around would be a multi-year process. But at least the Jackets are generating some excitement on campus after a long dry spell. | | PITTSBURGH: Last season: 16-17, first losing season since 1999-2000
Who's gone: F Michael Young, G/F Jamel Artis, G Cam Johnson, F Sheldon Jeter, G Chris Jones, C Rozelle Nix, G Jonathan Milligan, G Justice Kithcart, G Damon Wilson, F Corey Manigault.
Who's back: F Ryan Luther averaged 5.7 points and 3.9 rebounds last season; G Jonathan Milligan.
Who's new: Everybody else. G/F Jared Wilson-Frame averaged 14.8 points, 3.8 rebounds and 2.9 assists for Northwest Florida State last season. G Marcus Carr averaged 9.1 points, 3.5 rebounds and 3.7 assists for Montverde Academy (Florida) as a senior. F/C Terrell Brown averaged 16.1 points, 6.5 rebounds and 2.8 blocks at Tilton School (N.H.). G/F Shamiel Stevenson, Canadian native averaged 14.2 points, 6.3 rebounds, 2.1 assists and 1.2 blocks for Hillcrest Prep (Arizona).
The Skinny: Stallings basically blew up the program following a bumpy first season that saw the Panthers miss out on postseason play for the first time since 2000. Pitt's ability to compete this season is going to depend heavily on the reconstructed roster coming together quickly. Expectations are low. Pitt was picked to finish last in the conference, meaning any upward movement would be considered a success for a team that was an NCAA Tournament staple under Ben Howland and Jamie Dixon. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:11:37 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|