|
|
BALL ST C MICHIGAN |
|
| 55 | 24 Final 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
127 | BALL ST | +8.5 | Over 49 | 128 | C MICHIGAN | +3.5 | Under 61 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-4 | -1.6 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 26.0 | 13.5 | 458.3 | (5.4) | 1.2 | 24.0 | 12.7 | 406.2 | (5.5) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-2 | -1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 348.0 | (4.2) | 1.5 | 31.0 | 19.0 | 435.5 | (5.9) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 29.3 | 17.0 | 467.3 | (5.3) | 1.0 | 25.3 | 12.7 | 425.0 | (5.5) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 2-4 | -1.6 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 26.0 | 13.5 | 458.3 | (5.4) | 1.2 | 24.0 | 12.7 | 406.2 | (5.5) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 34.0 | 20.5 | 498.5 | (5.2) | 1.5 | 24.0 | 15.5 | 415.5 | (5.3) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.0 | 13.5 | 25.8 | 30:49 | 41-183 | (4.5) | 26-44 | 58.4% | 275 | (6.2) | 85-458 | (5.4) | (17.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.9 | 12.9 | 23 | 30:22 | 41-180 | (4.4) | 21-35 | 60.5% | 258 | (7.4) | 76-438 | (5.8) | (15.1) | Offense Road Games | 13.0 | 4.5 | 21.0 | 30:49 | 43-186 | (4.3) | 18-39 | 47.4% | 161 | (4.1) | 82-348 | (4.2) | (26.8) | Defense (All Games) | 24.0 | 12.7 | 23.0 | 29:10 | 41-185 | (4.5) | 21-33 | 64.3% | 221 | (6.7) | 74-406 | (5.5) | (16.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.8 | 12.4 | 20.7 | 30:38 | 40-162 | (4.1) | 21-34 | 61.0% | 207 | (6.2) | 74-370 | (5) | (17) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 19.0 | 23.0 | 29:11 | 42-186 | (4.4) | 20-31 | 65.1% | 249 | (7.9) | 74-435 | (5.9) | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-5 | -3.6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 17.3 | 6.5 | 269.8 | (4.2) | 2.7 | 26.7 | 12.7 | 350.7 | (5) | 1.5 | Home Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 16.0 | 4.3 | 265.7 | (4.3) | 4.0 | 23.3 | 8.0 | 349.3 | (4.9) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 20.3 | 5.3 | 254.0 | (4.2) | 2.7 | 23.3 | 11.3 | 344.0 | (4.8) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 16.8 | 7.2 | 274.8 | (4.2) | 2.8 | 25.8 | 11.8 | 351.8 | (5) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 20.0 | 3.0 | 331.0 | (4.5) | 3.0 | 29.0 | 15.5 | 353.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.3 | 6.5 | 14.7 | 26:15 | 35-118 | (3.4) | 16-29 | 53.4% | 151 | (5.2) | 64-270 | (4.2) | (15.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.4 | 10.7 | 18.5 | 29:43 | 37-116 | (3.1) | 19-33 | 56.7% | 224 | (6.7) | 70-339 | (4.8) | (15.2) | Offense Home Games | 16.0 | 4.3 | 14.3 | 24:55 | 35-122 | (3.5) | 13-27 | 48.1% | 144 | (5.3) | 62-266 | (4.3) | (16.6) | Defense (All Games) | 26.7 | 12.7 | 20.7 | 33:45 | 45-205 | (4.6) | 15-26 | 58.1% | 145 | (5.6) | 70-351 | (5) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.8 | 12.5 | 18.8 | 31:17 | 39-157 | (4.1) | 17-30 | 58.7% | 189 | (6.3) | 69-346 | (5) | (13.4) | Defense Home Games | 23.3 | 8.0 | 19.7 | 35:05 | 43-198 | (4.6) | 16-28 | 56.6% | 152 | (5.5) | 71-349 | (4.9) | (15) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BALL ST 26.3, C MICHIGAN 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | C CONN ST | 42-6 | W | -20 | W | | - | 48-316 | 28-36-336 | 1 | 38-174 | 14-28-117 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ NOTRE DAME | 16-24 | L | 33.5 | W | 59.5 | U | 47-169 | 23-50-180 | 2 | 41-117 | 17-31-297 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | @ INDIANA | 10-38 | L | 15 | L | 62.5 | U | 39-204 | 14-28-143 | 1 | 44-255 | 24-32-202 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | W KENTUCKY | 20-28 | L | -3 | L | 52.5 | U | 29-120 | 27-45-285 | 0 | 40-192 | 25-35-252 | 0 | 9/29/2018 | KENT ST | 52-24 | W | -7 | W | 60 | O | 42-160 | 32-52-446 | 2 | 41-147 | 30-44-314 | 3 | 10/6/2018 | N ILLINOIS | 16-24 | L | 2.5 | L | 53.5 | U | 40-131 | 32-56-260 | 1 | 43-227 | 18-29-143 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/25/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2018 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ KENTUCKY | 20-35 | L | 17 | W | 50.5 | O | 39-118 | 17-27-137 | 0 | 43-299 | 15-27-128 | 4 | 9/8/2018 | KANSAS | 7-31 | L | -3 | L | 48 | U | 28-103 | 18-32-177 | 6 | 45-216 | 18-27-145 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | 16-24 | L | 13.5 | W | 48 | U | 46-164 | 18-33-158 | 2 | 48-180 | 12-20-104 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | MAINE | 17-5 | W | -7 | W | 55 | U | 41-95 | 7-16-82 | 2 | 37-82 | 19-36-183 | 2 | 9/29/2018 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 20-31 | L | 27.5 | W | 45.5 | O | 22-63 | 20-35-182 | 2 | 47-160 | 16-25-185 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | BUFFALO | 24-34 | L | 6.5 | L | 52 | O | 35-168 | 14-33-172 | 4 | 48-295 | 10-20-127 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BALL ST: Last season, the Cardinals averaged only 17.9 PPG, which was the ninth-worst mark in the nation. Don't expect that to happen again. Ball State was completely depleted by injuries in 2017, but both QB Riley Neal and RB James Gilbert are set to return to the lineup. The real issue for Ball State is on the defensive side of the ball, where the Cardinals will struggle to stop the run. In a conference full of potent running attacks, that's going to be a problem. Ball State will be more competitive this year, but it still won't win many games. | | C MICHIGAN: Running back Jonathan Ward racked up 1,489 yards from scrimmage last season, and he'll once again be the go-to guy for the Chippewas this year. The issue is that he could be facing some stacked boxes, as Central Michigan is inexperienced at both quarterback and wide receiver. But on defense, this team should be among the best in the division. It has a good group of linebackers and a solid defensive line. If a spotty secondary can play better than expected, then this Central Michigan team might finish above expectations. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:02:51 PM EST. |
|
|