|
|
TEMPLE CONNECTICUT |
|
| 68.5 | 57 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
147 | TEMPLE | -28.5 | -30.5 | 148 | CONNECTICUT | 68 | 68.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-4 | +1.3 | 7-4 | 5-5 | 33.6 | 17.6 | 411.5 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 26.3 | 14.1 | 369.7 | (4.7) | 2.2 | Road Games | 3-2 | +6.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 38.6 | 22.2 | 499.4 | (6.2) | 1.8 | 35.4 | 18.0 | 411.8 | (5.4) | 1.8 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 42.0 | 20.7 | 514.7 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 39.3 | 19.7 | 474.3 | (6) | 3.0 | Grass Games | 4-3 | -6.4 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 31.0 | 16.7 | 385.7 | (5.4) | 2.1 | 23.4 | 13.3 | 376.9 | (4.7) | 2.3 | Conference Games | 6-1 | +5.4 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 36.3 | 19.3 | 434.3 | (5.8) | 1.9 | 25.0 | 13.1 | 373.9 | (4.7) | 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.6 | 17.6 | 21.5 | 29:26 | 39-153 | (3.9) | 20-35 | 56.4% | 259 | (7.5) | 74-412 | (5.6) | (12.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.9 | 14.3 | 20.3 | 30:50 | 40-172 | (4.3) | 17-31 | 56.5% | 214 | (6.9) | 71-387 | (5.4) | (14.4) | Offense Road Games | 38.6 | 22.2 | 25.8 | 32:24 | 45-201 | (4.5) | 21-36 | 58.2% | 299 | (8.2) | 81-499 | (6.2) | (12.9) | Defense (All Games) | 26.3 | 14.1 | 23.2 | 30:34 | 46-197 | (4.3) | 18-33 | 53.0% | 172 | (5.2) | 79-370 | (4.7) | (14.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.5 | 16.5 | 22.4 | 30:15 | 44-217 | (4.9) | 17-30 | 57.8% | 216 | (7.2) | 74-433 | (5.8) | (13.8) | Defense Road Games | 35.4 | 18.0 | 24.6 | 27:36 | 47-240 | (5.1) | 14-29 | 49.3% | 172 | (5.9) | 77-412 | (5.4) | (11.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-10 | -4 | 3-8 | 6-4 | 23.5 | 13.2 | 391.0 | (5.6) | 2.2 | 49.8 | 26.6 | 626.6 | (8.7) | 0.9 | Home Games | 1-4 | -2 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 29.4 | 15.2 | 434.0 | (5.8) | 1.8 | 47.6 | 22.2 | 579.8 | (8.3) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 30.0 | 14.7 | 447.0 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 55.3 | 31.0 | 629.7 | (8.3) | 0.3 | Grass Games | 1-6 | -3 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 28.3 | 14.9 | 414.1 | (5.7) | 1.9 | 47.3 | 21.7 | 595.3 | (8.3) | 1.1 | Conference Games | 0-7 | -4 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 22.6 | 11.7 | 410.7 | (5.5) | 2.3 | 52.0 | 27.1 | 635.0 | (8.8) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 23.5 | 13.2 | 20.9 | 31:07 | 40-206 | (5.1) | 17-30 | 56.9% | 185 | (6.3) | 70-391 | (5.6) | (16.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.6 | 16.9 | 21.8 | 31:06 | 43-197 | (4.6) | 17-30 | 58.8% | 226 | (7.6) | 73-423 | (5.8) | (13.4) | Offense Home Games | 29.4 | 15.2 | 24.6 | 31:58 | 44-237 | (5.4) | 18-30 | 60.0% | 197 | (6.6) | 74-434 | (5.8) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 49.8 | 26.6 | 27.9 | 28:53 | 44-339 | (7.6) | 20-27 | 71.4% | 288 | (10.5) | 72-627 | (8.7) | (12.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35.5 | 18.7 | 23.6 | 29:48 | 40-196 | (4.9) | 20-34 | 59.7% | 266 | (7.8) | 74-462 | (6.2) | (13) | Defense Home Games | 47.6 | 22.2 | 26.8 | 28:01 | 42-275 | (6.6) | 20-28 | 70.4% | 304 | (10.7) | 70-580 | (8.3) | (12.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEMPLE 31.3, CONNECTICUT 30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 35-45 | L | 13.5 | W | 54.5 | O | 34-191 | 21-47-261 | 3 | 66-275 | 16-34-148 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | E CAROLINA | 49-6 | W | -10 | W | 53 | O | 48-173 | 25-30-297 | 1 | 28-76 | 18-39-120 | 0 | 10/13/2018 | @ NAVY | 24-17 | W | -6.5 | W | 49 | U | 34-109 | 23-32-300 | 2 | 53-270 | 3-11-14 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | CINCINNATI | 24-17 | W | -2.5 | W | 47 | U | 30-80 | 20-42-237 | 3 | 47-200 | 14-34-111 | 3 | 11/1/2018 | @ UCF | 40-52 | L | 10 | L | 60 | O | 46-226 | 31-52-444 | 2 | 43-318 | 17-33-312 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | @ HOUSTON | 59-49 | W | 3 | W | 68.5 | O | 58-312 | 15-23-225 | 1 | 44-205 | 28-47-322 | 3 | 11/17/2018 | S FLORIDA | 27-17 | W | -14 | L | 62.5 | U | 40-73 | 20-35-264 | 2 | 48-184 | 14-23-82 | 5 | 11/24/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2018 | CINCINNATI | 7-49 | L | 16 | L | 62.5 | U | 28-85 | 14-36-181 | 1 | 53-320 | 23-29-339 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | 14-55 | L | 35.5 | L | 77.5 | U | 30-112 | 24-43-215 | 4 | 40-378 | 17-19-256 | 0 | 10/20/2018 | @ S FLORIDA | 30-38 | L | 33.5 | W | 67.5 | O | 51-322 | 10-21-133 | 1 | 37-346 | 20-28-265 | 3 | 10/27/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | 17-22 | L | 3.5 | L | 64.5 | U | 44-250 | 4-6-15 | 1 | 53-247 | 8-15-197 | 2 | 11/3/2018 | @ TULSA | 19-49 | L | 19.5 | L | 59.5 | O | 50-255 | 14-28-232 | 3 | 57-470 | 9-14-168 | 1 | 11/10/2018 | SMU | 50-62 | L | 17.5 | W | 66 | O | 49-365 | 25-40-215 | 1 | 39-315 | 20-30-279 | 0 | 11/17/2018 | @ E CAROLINA | 21-55 | L | 17.5 | L | 70 | O | 29-91 | 17-33-183 | 3 | 54-415 | 22-33-242 | 0 | 11/24/2018 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEMPLE: Temple's defense will ultimately decide how good this team is, and the Owls lost a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Head coach Geoff Collins is a defensive-minded guy'he was the defensive coordinator at the University of Florida before taking this job last year'so one would think he'd be able to improve the pass rush and find some stability in the secondary. On offense, quarterback Frank Nutile enters the year with some real momentum after playing well to end the 2017 season. He'll often look to versatile wideout Isaiah Wright when going to the air. The running game should be solid as well. | | CONNECTICUT: Much like Cincinnati, the Huskies will be able to put up some points but they won't be able to prevent anybody from scoring them. The Huskies lost most of the talent off of their porous defense from a year ago, and it's hard to imagine them finding a way to slow down some of these potent AAC offenses. But with a good quarterback in David Pindell and some solid pass-catching weapons, they should be able to at least excite some of their fans in shootout losses. That just means very little when trying to justify backing them to actually win games. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/5/2024 11:21:04 PM EST. |
|
|