|
|
MASSACHUSETTS FLA INTERNATIONAL |
|
| 66 | 24 Final 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
113 | MASSACHUSETTS | +155 | 114 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 32.3 | 17.3 | 403.3 | (6.2) | 2.0 | 34.7 | 24.7 | 454.3 | (6.2) | 1.7 | Road Games | 0-2 | -1 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 319.0 | (5) | 2.5 | 44.5 | 32.5 | 555.0 | (7.2) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 32.3 | 17.3 | 403.3 | (6.2) | 2.0 | 34.7 | 24.7 | 454.3 | (6.2) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 42.0 | 21.0 | 443.5 | (6.6) | 2.0 | 35.0 | 28.5 | 437.5 | (5.7) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.3 | 17.3 | 20.3 | 26:55 | 32-152 | (4.7) | 21-33 | 64.3% | 252 | (7.7) | 65-403 | (6.2) | (12.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.8 | 16.4 | 18.9 | 28:38 | 39-186 | (4.7) | 16-28 | 58.1% | 197 | (7) | 68-383 | (5.7) | (12) | Offense Road Games | 17.0 | 8.5 | 18.5 | 27:02 | 29-86 | (3) | 22-35 | 62.9% | 232 | (6.6) | 64-319 | (5) | (18.8) | Defense (All Games) | 34.7 | 24.7 | 23.0 | 33:05 | 52-255 | (4.9) | 14-22 | 63.6% | 199 | (9) | 74-454 | (6.2) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 34.4 | 19.9 | 19.6 | 32:22 | 48-251 | (5.2) | 13-21 | 62.6% | 168 | (8.1) | 69-419 | (6.1) | (12.2) | Defense Road Games | 44.5 | 32.5 | 28.0 | 32:57 | 59-318 | (5.3) | 13-18 | 72.2% | 237 | (13.2) | 77-555 | (7.2) | (12.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 408.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 29.0 | 24.0 | 430.5 | (5.9) | 0.5 | Home Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 327.0 | (4.9) | 3.0 | 38.0 | 28.0 | 465.0 | (5.7) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 408.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 29.0 | 24.0 | 430.5 | (5.9) | 0.5 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 408.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 29.0 | 24.0 | 430.5 | (5.9) | 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.0 | 14.0 | 23.5 | 30:45 | 45-179 | (4) | 18-29 | 61.0% | 228 | (7.7) | 74-408 | (5.5) | (14.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 12.6 | 22.8 | 31:26 | 42-189 | (4.5) | 19-30 | 61.4% | 208 | (6.9) | 72-397 | (5.5) | (13.7) | Offense Home Games | 28.0 | 14.0 | 22.0 | 27:25 | 39-170 | (4.4) | 17-28 | 60.7% | 157 | (5.6) | 67-327 | (4.9) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 29.0 | 24.0 | 23.5 | 29:14 | 36-153 | (4.2) | 23-37 | 63.5% | 277 | (7.5) | 73-430 | (5.9) | (14.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.7 | 19 | 21.3 | 29:34 | 38-170 | (4.5) | 20-31 | 63.5% | 216 | (6.9) | 69-386 | (5.6) | (16.3) | Defense Home Games | 38.0 | 28.0 | 31.0 | 32:35 | 45-213 | (4.7) | 28-37 | 75.7% | 252 | (6.8) | 82-465 | (5.7) | (12.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MASSACHUSETTS 22.7, FLA INTERNATIONAL 24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2018 | DUQUESNE | 63-15 | W | -21 | W | 71 | O | 39-282 | 19-28-290 | 1 | 36-130 | 16-30-123 | 4 | 9/1/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 21-55 | L | 20.5 | L | 62 | O | 33-66 | 21-34-249 | 3 | 60-302 | 20-27-320 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | @ GA SOUTHERN | 13-34 | L | 1.5 | L | 60.5 | U | 25-107 | 23-36-216 | 2 | 59-334 | 6-9-154 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | @ FLA INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | INDIANA | 28-38 | L | 13 | W | 55.5 | O | 39-170 | 17-28-157 | 3 | 45-213 | 28-37-252 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ OLD DOMINION | 28-20 | W | -3 | W | 51 | U | 51-189 | 19-31-300 | 1 | 27-93 | 19-37-303 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/22/2018 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | AK-PINE BLUFF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | MIDDLE TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MASSACHUSETTS: A 4-12 record doesn't tell the full story of the Minutemen's 2017 season, in which they suffered an 0-6 start'with the average defeat coming only by a single score. A strong offense returns in its entirety for UMass, and Mark Whipple always delivers innovation on that side of the ball. If the team doesn't improve it will be its defense that held it back, as there's plenty of churn in the front seven. | | FLA INTERNATIONAL: FIU has a decent offensive line and some talent at running back, which should help it create short-yardage situations on third down. The problem is that this passing game can't be trusted to pick up the rest of the slack. The Golden Panthers don't have any difference-makers at receiver, and neither Christian Alexander nor James Morgan is an inspiring option at quarterback. Defensively, FIU is going to be pretty good up front. That's the best that can be said about the unit. Head coach Butch Davis is too good of a coach for this team to stray too far away from the .500 mark. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:19:33 AM EST. |
|
|