|
|
BALL ST MIAMI OHIO |
|
| 56 | 21 Final 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
103 | BALL ST | +23.5 | Over 48 | 104 | MIAMI OHIO | -11.5 | Under 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-7 | +0.4 | 5-6 | 4-6 | 24.5 | 11.7 | 411.0 | (5.3) | 1.8 | 31.5 | 17.5 | 443.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | Road Games | 1-4 | -0.9 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 15.4 | 6.0 | 346.8 | (4.6) | 2.4 | 36.4 | 23.4 | 468.8 | (6.3) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1.9 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 23.0 | 11.7 | 342.7 | (5.3) | 3.3 | 46.0 | 25.3 | 544.3 | (6.6) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 4-7 | +0.4 | 5-6 | 4-6 | 24.5 | 11.7 | 411.0 | (5.3) | 1.8 | 31.5 | 17.5 | 443.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 3-4 | +2 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 25.9 | 12.7 | 395.4 | (5.2) | 2.3 | 35.9 | 21.1 | 467.4 | (5.9) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.5 | 11.7 | 23.7 | 28:06 | 38-157 | (4.2) | 24-40 | 60.2% | 254 | (6.4) | 78-411 | (5.3) | (16.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.7 | 14.2 | 21.5 | 30:11 | 41-186 | (4.6) | 19-31 | 60.5% | 230 | (7.3) | 72-416 | (5.8) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 15.4 | 6.0 | 21.0 | 29:05 | 39-141 | (3.6) | 21-37 | 55.7% | 206 | (5.6) | 76-347 | (4.6) | (22.5) | Defense (All Games) | 31.5 | 17.5 | 24.9 | 31:54 | 46-228 | (4.9) | 20-31 | 64.9% | 215 | (7) | 77-443 | (5.8) | (14.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.3 | 13.7 | 20.8 | 30:46 | 40-179 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 59.5% | 207 | (6.6) | 71-386 | (5.4) | (14.7) | Defense Road Games | 36.4 | 23.4 | 25.2 | 30:55 | 46-250 | (5.4) | 18-29 | 62.2% | 219 | (7.7) | 75-469 | (6.3) | (12.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | +1 | 7-4 | 6-5 | 26.8 | 14.1 | 358.3 | (5.3) | 0.8 | 25.9 | 11.2 | 366.9 | (5.2) | 1.3 | Home Games | 2-2 | +0.5 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 32.0 | 20.7 | 413.5 | (6) | 0.5 | 27.2 | 10.5 | 410.7 | (6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2.6 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 28.3 | 17.3 | 337.0 | (4.9) | 0.7 | 28.7 | 11.7 | 412.7 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 5-6 | +1 | 7-4 | 6-5 | 26.8 | 14.1 | 358.3 | (5.3) | 0.8 | 25.9 | 11.2 | 366.9 | (5.2) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +5.3 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 33.4 | 19.7 | 384.9 | (5.6) | 0.7 | 24.6 | 8.9 | 388.3 | (5.5) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.8 | 14.1 | 18.7 | 31:23 | 35-141 | (4) | 20-33 | 59.9% | 217 | (6.7) | 68-358 | (5.3) | (13.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.6 | 13.1 | 19.2 | 29:43 | 38-160 | (4.3) | 17-30 | 57.6% | 213 | (7.1) | 68-373 | (5.5) | (14) | Offense Home Games | 32.0 | 20.7 | 21.7 | 31:25 | 35-149 | (4.2) | 21-34 | 61.5% | 265 | (7.8) | 69-413 | (6) | (12.9) | Defense (All Games) | 25.9 | 11.2 | 20.5 | 29:59 | 40-161 | (4) | 17-30 | 57.6% | 206 | (6.9) | 70-367 | (5.2) | (14.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.8 | 14.8 | 21 | 31:23 | 43-189 | (4.4) | 16-28 | 57.5% | 201 | (7.1) | 71-391 | (5.5) | (13.5) | Defense Home Games | 27.2 | 10.5 | 21.2 | 28:35 | 34-155 | (4.5) | 20-34 | 60.3% | 256 | (7.5) | 68-411 | (6) | (15.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BALL ST 27.5, MIAMI OHIO 29.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2018 | W KENTUCKY | 20-28 | L | -3 | L | 52.5 | U | 29-120 | 27-45-285 | 0 | 40-192 | 25-35-252 | 0 | 9/29/2018 | KENT ST | 52-24 | W | -7 | W | 60 | O | 42-160 | 32-52-446 | 2 | 41-147 | 30-44-314 | 3 | 10/6/2018 | N ILLINOIS | 16-24 | L | 2.5 | L | 53.5 | U | 40-131 | 32-56-260 | 1 | 43-227 | 18-29-143 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | 24-23 | W | 2 | W | 55 | U | 51-157 | 20-27-202 | 1 | 50-261 | 11-23-127 | 0 | 10/20/2018 | E MICHIGAN | 20-42 | L | 2.5 | L | 45 | O | 32-227 | 21-39-157 | 2 | 49-163 | 22-28-257 | 1 | 10/25/2018 | @ OHIO U | 14-52 | L | 10 | L | 65.5 | O | 23-80 | 16-32-162 | 3 | 57-411 | 12-22-143 | 1 | 10/31/2018 | @ TOLEDO | 13-45 | L | 20.5 | L | 64 | U | 35-94 | 30-48-343 | 5 | 38-204 | 25-35-327 | 5 | 11/13/2018 | W MICHIGAN | 42-41 | W | 9.5 | W | 58.5 | O | 28-67 | 22-27-282 | 2 | 67-361 | 20-29-187 | 1 | 11/20/2018 | @ MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/22/2018 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 38-23 | W | -6.5 | W | 55 | O | 52-289 | 10-15-119 | 0 | 34-85 | 33-50-300 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | W MICHIGAN | 39-40 | L | 3 | W | 53 | O | 27-55 | 22-32-294 | 0 | 37-123 | 27-42-439 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ AKRON | 41-17 | W | 4.5 | W | 47 | O | 38-208 | 24-33-214 | 2 | 28-56 | 19-35-203 | 5 | 10/13/2018 | KENT ST | 31-6 | W | -11 | W | 58.5 | U | 51-295 | 16-25-209 | 1 | 31-125 | 15-29-149 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ ARMY | 30-31 | L | 6.5 | W | 47 | O | 27-77 | 30-53-329 | 0 | 74-347 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 10/30/2018 | @ BUFFALO | 42-51 | L | 8 | L | 53 | O | 41-140 | 20-35-313 | 1 | 39-147 | 20-35-358 | 0 | 11/7/2018 | OHIO U | 30-28 | W | 4.5 | W | 59 | U | 35-158 | 20-32-199 | 1 | 32-201 | 16-28-163 | 1 | 11/14/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | 13-7 | W | 6 | W | 48 | U | 41-94 | 15-24-107 | 0 | 37-212 | 15-33-157 | 2 | 11/20/2018 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BALL ST: Last season, the Cardinals averaged only 17.9 PPG, which was the ninth-worst mark in the nation. Don't expect that to happen again. Ball State was completely depleted by injuries in 2017, but both QB Riley Neal and RB James Gilbert are set to return to the lineup. The real issue for Ball State is on the defensive side of the ball, where the Cardinals will struggle to stop the run. In a conference full of potent running attacks, that's going to be a problem. Ball State will be more competitive this year, but it still won't win many games. | | MIAMI OHIO: Quarterback Gus Ragland and first-team All-MAC wide receiver James Gardner form the foundation of one of the conference's best passing attacks. With the two of them feeding off of one another, the RedHawks will be explosive offensively. They'll just need a bit of help from the running game, which should be more than doable with 2017 leading rushers Kenny Young and Alonzo Smith both returning.. Defensively, Miami returns eight starters. The problem is that the secondary is a bit depleted, which could be an issue. The RedHawks lost a lot of close games last year, and mistakes on the backend could similarly doom them in 2018. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:48:23 AM EST. |
|
|