|
|
FLA INTERNATIONAL RICE |
|
| 53 | 13 Final 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
395 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 54 | 52.5 | 396 | RICE | -2.5 | -2.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 400.0 | (6.2) | 2.5 | 35.5 | 23.5 | 428.0 | (6.2) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 335.0 | (5.9) | 4.0 | 61.0 | 40.0 | 587.0 | (7.5) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 400.0 | (6.2) | 2.5 | 35.5 | 23.5 | 428.0 | (6.2) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 465.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 269.0 | (4.6) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.0 | 8.5 | 19.5 | 28:37 | 33-135 | (4.1) | 19-32 | 60.9% | 264 | (8.3) | 65-400 | (6.2) | (23.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 17 | 8.5 | 19.5 | 29:38 | 33-136 | (4.1) | 20-32 | 60.9% | 264 | (8.3) | 65-400 | (6.2) | (23.5) | Offense Road Games | 17.0 | 10.0 | 13.0 | 24:31 | 26-134 | (5.2) | 18-31 | 58.1% | 201 | (6.5) | 57-335 | (5.9) | (19.7) | Defense (All Games) | 35.5 | 23.5 | 21.5 | 31:22 | 35-113 | (3.2) | 24-33 | 71.6% | 315 | (9.4) | 68-428 | (6.2) | (12.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35.5 | 23.5 | 21.5 | 31:22 | 35-113 | (3.2) | 24-34 | 71.6% | 315 | (9.4) | 68-428 | (6.2) | (12.1) | Defense Road Games | 61.0 | 40.0 | 31.0 | 35:29 | 45-148 | (3.3) | 26-33 | 78.8% | 439 | (13.3) | 78-587 | (7.5) | (9.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 13.7 | 3.3 | 306.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | 38.0 | 27.7 | 423.0 | (6.2) | 0.3 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 13.7 | 3.3 | 306.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | 38.0 | 27.7 | 423.0 | (6.2) | 0.3 | Turf Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 339.5 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 26.0 | 22.5 | 356.5 | (5.4) | 0.5 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 31.0 | 10.0 | 437.0 | (6.5) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 229.0 | (4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 13.7 | 3.3 | 16.7 | 29:36 | 41-194 | (4.8) | 10-22 | 46.3% | 113 | (5.1) | 63-307 | (4.9) | (22.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.5 | 14.8 | 22.4 | 33:48 | 44-206 | (4.7) | 18-28 | 65.7% | 211 | (7.6) | 72-417 | (5.8) | (15.2) | Defense (All Games) | 38.0 | 27.7 | 20.3 | 30:24 | 32-148 | (4.6) | 24-36 | 67.6% | 275 | (7.6) | 68-423 | (6.2) | (11.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.1 | 18.6 | 16.3 | 27:12 | 28-131 | (4.6) | 21-32 | 64.2% | 208 | (6.5) | 60-339 | (5.6) | (13.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: FLA INTERNATIONAL 15.5, RICE 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2017 | @ UCF | 17-61 | L | 17.5 | L | 56.5 | O | 26-134 | 18-31-201 | 4 | 45-148 | 26-33-439 | 2 | 9/8/2017 | ALCORN ST | 17-10 | W | -18.5 | L | 58 | U | 40-137 | 21-33-328 | 1 | 25-78 | 22-34-191 | 0 | 9/23/2017 | @ RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ MIDDLE TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/26/2017 | *STANFORD | 7-62 | L | 29.5 | L | 51 | O | 38-146 | 10-24-95 | 2 | 36-287 | 21-37-269 | 0 | 9/9/2017 | @ UTEP | 31-14 | W | 1.5 | W | 55 | U | 49-306 | 10-18-131 | 1 | 24-26 | 18-33-203 | 1 | 9/16/2017 | @ HOUSTON | 3-38 | L | 23.5 | L | 53.5 | U | 35-129 | 11-25-113 | 3 | 37-130 | 34-38-354 | 0 | 9/23/2017 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ UTSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| FLA INTERNATIONAL: FIU was outside of the top-100 in both PPG and opponent's PPG last year. This team needs to improve on both sides of the ball, and there is reason for optimisim. FIU is an experienced group and Butch Davis is excellent. | | RICE: Rice has an experienced O-Line that should make for a potent running game. The offense will be rock solid, but the passing defense needs to improve. Rice allowed more YPG passing than all but six teams last year. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:24:52 AM EST. |
|
|