| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES CHICAGO |
|
| 167 | 115 Final 106 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
663 | LOS ANGELES | -300 | 664 | CHICAGO | +220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (261-109 since 1997.) (70.5%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (305-133 since 1997.) (69.6%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (305-133 since 1997.) (69.6%, +76.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (88-56 since 1997.) (61.1%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (31-21 since 1997.) (59.6%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (49-23 since 1997.) (68.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (25-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.2%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (117-29 since 1997.) (80.1%, +61.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (95-21 since 1997.) (81.9%, +54.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (109-29 since 1997.) (79%, +54.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (121-84 since 1997.) (59%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (174-64 since 1997.) (73.1%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games. (44-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +35 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (83-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (74-21 since 1997.) (77.9%, +38.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (139-54 since 1997.) (72%, +35.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite against opponent off an home win scoring 85 or more points. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (103-45 since 1997.) (69.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (49-23 since 1997.) (68.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (36-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (68-43 since 1997.) (61.3%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (60-37 since 1997.) (61.9%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (87-29 since 1997.) (75%, +25.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (53-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (52-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (52-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (52-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +17.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (28-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +27.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (29-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (37-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +9.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (44-13 since 1997.) (77.2%, +17.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +14.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.6%, +34.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games. (31-17 since 1997.) (64.6%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a losing record. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +11.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games. (36-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +13.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (34-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +13.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +13.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (53-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 82 | | 31-68 | 45.5% | 5-16 | 30.7% | 15-18 | 82.6% | 40 | 10 | 12 | CHICAGO | 78 | | 31-67 | 46.2% | 6-17 | 36.4% | 10-13 | 77.2% | 42 | 11 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 603 times, while CHICAGO won 363 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 17-3 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 107-37 against the money line (+45.2 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 71.5 | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 77.0 | LOS ANGELES is 49-10 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.1, OPPONENT 78.0 | CHICAGO is 113-154 against the money line (-59.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 24-53 against the money line (-39.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 28-58 against the money line (-37.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 27-51 against the money line (-34.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 24-51 against the money line (-26.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 89.2 | CHICAGO is 70-102 against the money line (-48.8 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.9 | CHICAGO is 17-24 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in home games when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 86.2 | CHICAGO is 0-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 89.3 | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 85.0 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 50-75 against the money line (-77.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 79.7 | LOS ANGELES is 44-55 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 65-57 against the money line (-34.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 86.4 | LOS ANGELES is 113-106 against the money line (-54.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 184-156 against the money line (-85.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | CHICAGO is 62-39 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | CHICAGO is 19-13 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 81.4 | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.5 | CHICAGO is 12-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 87.1 | CHICAGO is 43-30 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.5, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 82-131 against the money line (-58.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 57-91 against the money line (-38.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 79-129 against the money line (-63.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 85-131 against the money line (-49.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 27-59 against the money line (-35.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 81-80 against the money line (-40.1 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 64-71 against the money line (-34.3 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 71-73 against the money line (-62.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 110-107 against the money line (-77.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 111-100 against the money line (-54.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 159-140 against the money line (-65.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 80-99 against the money line (-47.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 136-120 against the money line (-52.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 200-176 against the money line (-64.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 139-122 against the money line (-57.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-19 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 132-104 against the money line (-60.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 191-150 against the money line (-76.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-17 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 184-182 against the money line (-69.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 99-77 against the money line (-62.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 90.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-15 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 19-14 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in home games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-93 against the money line (-35.3 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 117-145 against the money line (-48.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 21-37 against the money line (-24.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-20 against the money line (-18.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 62-93 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 2 straight games being called for 5+ less fouls than opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-31 against the money line (-19.1 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 22-32 against the money line (-20.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 72.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 99-147 against the money line (-57.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 76-115 against the money line (-50.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-21 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 83-116 against the money line (-46.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-5.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 76-97 against the money line (-38.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 53-77 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 78-116 against the money line (-46.2 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-51 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 1-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) as a road favorite of -270 to -450 this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 70-83 against the money line (-35.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-7 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 58% of their shots or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-27 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 94-82 against the money line (-54.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 139-105 against the money line (-76.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-17 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-31 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-34 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-0 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-14 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-11 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 5-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 90 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 4-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 20-8 | -5.7 | 16-12 | 9-19 | 83.1 | 43.0 | 47.8% | 38.5 | 76.3 | 38.3 | 43.2% | 39.2 | Road Games | 8-7 | -7.2 | 8-7 | 6-9 | 82.1 | 41.5 | 48.3% | 36.3 | 79.3 | 38.6 | 44.4% | 40.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 80.0 | 41.2 | 45.4% | 37.6 | 73.6 | 40.2 | 41.6% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.1 | 43.0 | 31-65 | 47.8% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 16-19 | 82.4% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.1 | 41.5 | 31-64 | 48.3% | 5-15 | 33.8% | 15-18 | 83.6% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.3 | 38.3 | 28-65 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.3 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 36.9% | 14-18 | 78.3% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-16 | +1.8 | 14-13 | 14-12 | 81.4 | 39.7 | 45.9% | 42.7 | 84.4 | 42.9 | 42.6% | 44.8 | Home Games | 4-9 | -7.1 | 4-9 | 9-4 | 82.6 | 42.5 | 46.4% | 42.3 | 87.0 | 45.4 | 44.1% | 43.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 85.6 | 42.8 | 48.8% | 37.8 | 80.4 | 41.6 | 43.3% | 44.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.4 | 39.7 | 32-70 | 45.9% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 11-15 | 77.4% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.5 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.6 | 42.5 | 32-70 | 46.4% | 7-18 | 38.5% | 11-14 | 75.9% | 42 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 5 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.4 | 42.9 | 31-73 | 42.6% | 5-17 | 31.1% | 17-22 | 77.9% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 32.8% | 16-21 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 87.0 | 45.4 | 32-72 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.3, CHICAGO 71.1 |
| | |
|
|
7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 87-77 | W | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | 7/17/2017 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 12 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 16 | 7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 80-82 | L | -850 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 7/25/2017 | SEATTLE | 68-60 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 48 | 11 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 37 | 18 | 7/28/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-73 | W | -650 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 33 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | DALLAS | 95-74 | W | -850 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | 8/4/2017 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -450 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | 8/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | 79-85 | L | -270 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | 8/11/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-64 | W | +180 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 41 | 16 | 8/13/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 69-83 | L | -140 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 10 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 11 | 8/16/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 95-62 | W | -250 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 38 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 30 | 20 | 8/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/24/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/12/2017 | DALLAS | 90-84 | W | +135 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 49 | 21 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 35 | 12 | 7/14/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 78-68 | W | +220 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 39 | 7 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 58 | 10 | 7/16/2017 | @ DALLAS | 106-112 | L | +175 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 55 | 21 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 64 | 12 | 7/18/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 94-83 | W | +200 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 36 | 9 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 7/20/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-80 | W | +550 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 7/25/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-93 | L | +220 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 7/28/2017 | PHOENIX | 80-86 | L | -210 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 40 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | NEW YORK | 82-86 | L | +145 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 14 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 46 | 16 | 8/4/2017 | @ INDIANA | 81-70 | W | +100 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 43 | 15 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 37 | 14 | 8/5/2017 | ATLANTA | 91-86 | W | +105 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 31 | 6 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 57 | 12 | 8/10/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 94-74 | W | -300 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 36 | 12 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 38 | 17 | 8/18/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 20-8 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-9 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-5 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 82 | 164 | SU ATS | 35 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 38 | 7 | 12 | | LOS ANGELES | 80 | -12 | Under | 45 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 35 | 4 | 11 | 6/6/2017 | CHICAGO | 70 | 168.5 | ATS | 35 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 48 | 8 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -13 | SU Under | 41 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 31-40 | 77.5% | 44 | 7 | 7 | 10/4/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 55 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 28-30 | 93.3% | 31 | 4 | 15 | | CHICAGO | 75 | 165 | Over | 31 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 43 | 14 | 18 | 10/2/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 66 | -8 | Under | 39 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 6-33 | 18.2% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 47 | 14 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 70 | 173.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 1-3 | 33.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 44 | 10 | 8 | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 84 | 169 | Over | 42 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 44 | 14 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 99 | -12 | SU ATS | 57 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 7 | 18 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 75 | 167.5 | Over | 35 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 0-2 | 0.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 11 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -11 | SU ATS | 52 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 7/13/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 44 | 2 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 67 | 169 | Under | 35 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 32 | 10 | 5 | 6/14/2016 | CHICAGO | 85 | 168.5 | Over | 37 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 36 | 11 | 9 | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | -8 | SU ATS | 46 | 39-67 | 58.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 16-17 | 94.1% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 5/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 37 | 6 | 8 | | CHICAGO | 80 | 165.5 | Over | 35 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 40 | 7 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 151-103 against the money line (+36.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 122-80 against the money line (+24.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 22-10 against the money line (+9.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-10 against the money line (+15.9 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 23-8 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 52-17 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 68-46 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 177-135 against the money line (+28.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 19-15 against the money line (-18.2 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-7 against the money line (-17.0 Units) as a road favorite of -270 to -450 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 27-28 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 27-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 31-38 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.5, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 17-19 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-11 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-13 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 19-13 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 22-17 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-24 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-16 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 16-10 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 2-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 1-7 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 11-17 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 10-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-14 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 18-23 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 32-49 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 30-24 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-14 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-19 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 12-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-15 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-17 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-22 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-14 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-12 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 51-54 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 8-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 7-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 8-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 6-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Stocks is 5-1 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 7-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 4-1 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 90.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 7-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 35 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 08/10/2017 - Cheyenne Parker "?" Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Ankle ) | [G] 05/28/2017 - Jamierra Faulkner out for season ( ACL ) | [C] 05/21/2017 - Alaina Coates out indefinitely ( Ankle ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 8:33:20 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|