| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS CHICAGO |
|
| 181 | 99 Final 114 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
317 | DALLAS | -300 | 318 | CHICAGO | +220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (74-49 since 1997.) (60.2%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (86-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent. (50-27 since 1997.) (64.9%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (175-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent. (28-6 since 1997.) (82.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (26-15 since 1997.) (63.4%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (49-30 since 1997.) (62%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent. (22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +18.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more free throws than opponent. (25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent. (25-8 since 1997.) (75.8%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (60-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (67-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (199-120 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +23.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (60-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.1%, +53.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season. (61-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.3%, +37 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (44-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (83-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (84-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (140-99 since 1997.) (58.6%, +64.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (201-116 since 1997.) (63.4%, +55.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (112-77 since 1997.) (59.3%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (124-41 since 1997.) (75.2%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (202-155 since 1997.) (56.6%, +47.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (140-42 since 1997.) (76.9%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (82-16 since 1997.) (83.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (77-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +24 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (171-130 since 1997.) (56.8%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (93-67 since 1997.) (58.1%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (151-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (77-21 since 1997.) (78.6%, +41.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games. (79-69 since 1997.) (53.4%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games. (88-23 since 1997.) (79.3%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (83-41 since 1997.) (66.9%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (56-9 since 1997.) (86.2%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (47-35 since 1997.) (57.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (105-30 since 1997.) (77.8%, +34.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (69-47 since 1997.) (59.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (76-47 since 1997.) (61.8%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (49-21 since 1997.) (70%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +27.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +27.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +27.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (64-38 since 1997.) (62.7%, +27.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (40-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite against opponent off a home loss by 10 points or more. (41-7 since 1997.) (85.4%, +24 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (41-20 since 1997.) (67.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (53-22 since 1997.) (70.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (44-18 since 1997.) (71%, +21.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two good shooting teams (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 90 | | 32-69 | 47.1% | 7-22 | 33.8% | 18-23 | 79.1% | 47 | 14 | 14 | CHICAGO | 80 | | 29-68 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 34.6% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 39 | 11 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 757 times, while CHICAGO won 219 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 13-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 82.7 | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 77.7 | DALLAS is 9-1 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 80.2 | DALLAS is 15-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 82.5 | DALLAS is 13-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.2, OPPONENT 82.5 | DALLAS is 12-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 83.1 | CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 91.9 | CHICAGO is 48-77 against the money line (-38.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.0 | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 90.2 | CHICAGO is 1-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 91.9 | CHICAGO is 52-81 against the money line (-35.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.4 | CHICAGO is 29-55 against the money line (-33.2 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.9 | CHICAGO is 4-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 93.7 | CHICAGO is 7-31 against the money line (-22.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 94.6 | CHICAGO is 1-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 91.0 | CHICAGO is 1-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 90.3 | CHICAGO is 64-67 against the money line (-33.4 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 89.9 | CHICAGO is 14-35 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 88.3 |
|
DALLAS is 29-47 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.8, OPPONENT 89.8 | CHICAGO is 138-75 against the money line (+84.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 82.8 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-6 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-6 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 96.5, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 91.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-6 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 92.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 59-102 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 83-145 against the money line (-70.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 87-88 against the money line (-40.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 88-149 against the money line (-63.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 45-48 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 68-80 against the money line (-38.4 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 41-59 against the money line (-27.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 94.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 4-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 15-25 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 14-9 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 14-9 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 8-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 10-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 91.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 92.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 93.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread this season. The average score was DALLAS 94.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-5 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 91.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-7 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 89.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 21-17 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-5 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was DALLAS 90.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-5 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season. The average score was DALLAS 88.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-5.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists this season. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 99.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 110-112 against the money line (-45.7 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 107-108 against the money line (-44.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 30-33 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in home games on Friday since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 65-106 against the money line (-43.8 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 22-41 against the money line (-27.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 23-38 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 65-106 against the money line (-43.8 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 95-128 against the money line (-43.8 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 58-66 against the money line (-30.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 37-65 against the money line (-29.8 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 75.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 105-165 against the money line (-64.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 82-131 against the money line (-55.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 112-162 against the money line (-54.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-56 against the money line (-31.2 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 33-40 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 43-55 against the money line (-32.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 32-73 against the money line (-41.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in home games after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 46-66 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 89-131 against the money line (-50.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 51-77 against the money line (-32.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 83-126 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after playing a home game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-11 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 95-140 against the money line (-48.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 14-26 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 4-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 20-16 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-9 | +6.8 | 16-7 | 14-7 | 88.0 | 45.5 | 45.1% | 46.1 | 81.6 | 41.7 | 42.0% | 40.8 | Road Games | 5-6 | +0.5 | 7-4 | 8-2 | 85.3 | 42.5 | 43.3% | 46.7 | 84.8 | 44.0 | 41.6% | 44.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 94.2 | 51.2 | 48.4% | 45.6 | 81.6 | 43.6 | 42.5% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.0 | 45.5 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 31.5% | 21-26 | 79.2% | 46 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.3 | 42.5 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 7-23 | 30.8% | 19-24 | 78.8% | 47 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.6 | 41.7 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 17-22 | 80.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.8 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.8 | 44.0 | 30-71 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 20-25 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-16 | -4.5 | 8-13 | 14-9 | 80.7 | 39.7 | 43.5% | 40.7 | 89.6 | 46.1 | 47.0% | 43.6 | Home Games | 5-7 | +1 | 4-6 | 8-4 | 81.4 | 37.8 | 43.6% | 41.8 | 88.2 | 45.6 | 45.6% | 44.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 78.0 | 39.0 | 44.5% | 38.4 | 91.4 | 47.6 | 47.5% | 43.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.7 | 39.7 | 29-68 | 43.5% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 15-18 | 80.0% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.4 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 43.6% | 7-19 | 36.4% | 16-19 | 80.8% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.6 | 46.1 | 34-72 | 47.0% | 7-19 | 36.7% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 44 | 11 | 23 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 16-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.2 | 45.6 | 33-72 | 45.6% | 7-19 | 38.3% | 15-20 | 75.5% | 44 | 10 | 23 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.9, CHICAGO 72 |
| | |
|
|
6/12/2018 | PHOENIX | 72-75 | L | -115 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/15/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-67 | W | -330 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 48 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 11 | 6/19/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-91 | L | +300 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 22 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 101-72 | W | +170 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 46 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 27 | 12 | 6/24/2018 | SEATTLE | 76-97 | L | -125 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 32 | 13 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 46 | 15 | 6/26/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-87 | L | +350 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 47 | 17 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 12 | 6/27/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-91 | W | -120 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 40 | 11 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 13 | 7/1/2018 | MINNESOTA | 72-76 | L | +145 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 16 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 42 | 13 | 7/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 108-85 | W | -270 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 7/5/2018 | INDIANA | 90-63 | W | -550 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 60 | 18 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 27 | 12 | 7/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 97-87 | W | -165 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 53 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | 7/10/2018 | PHOENIX | 101-72 | W | -140 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 14 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 21 | 7/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 92-77 | W | +200 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 7/14/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 84-91 | L | +170 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 15 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 50 | 14 | 7/17/2018 | NEW YORK | 104-87 | W | -360 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 41 | 11 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 38 | 16 | 7/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | 90-81 | W | -200 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 54 | 13 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 44 | 9 | 7/20/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/10/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-77 | L | | 21-74 | 28.4% | 41 | 7 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 49 | 13 | 6/12/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 85-96 | L | +400 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 9 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 40 | 13 | 6/17/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | +325 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 46 | 9 | 6/19/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 60-88 | L | +350 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | WASHINGTON | 77-93 | L | +180 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 6/24/2018 | PHOENIX | 97-88 | W | +220 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 39 | 15 | 6/27/2018 | ATLANTA | 93-80 | W | -125 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 14 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 43 | 16 | 6/29/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 103-99 | W | +145 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 34 | 13 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 38 | 11 | 7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 94-97 | L | -155 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 48 | 15 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 13 | 7/3/2018 | @ DALLAS | 85-108 | L | +210 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 80-84 | L | +170 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 16 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 50 | 9 | 7/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 77-63 | W | +300 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 42 | 14 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 7/10/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 74-98 | L | -175 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 12 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 49 | 14 | 7/13/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 72-88 | L | +375 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 43 | 17 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 44 | 14 | 7/15/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 84-107 | L | +175 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 28 | 17 | 41-67 | 61.2% | 44 | 14 | 7/18/2018 | SEATTLE | 83-101 | L | +300 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 37 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 38 | 13 | 7/20/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
DALLAS is 19-12 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-3 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 8-8 (-0.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 2-1 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 85 | 174 | Over | 49 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 38 | 10 | 15 | | DALLAS | 108 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 40 | 12 | 13 | 8/30/2017 | DALLAS | 99 | 178 | SU ATS | 48 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 49 | 20 | 10 | | CHICAGO | 96 | -3 | Over | 52 | 40-68 | 58.8% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 32 | 4 | 12 | 7/16/2017 | CHICAGO | 106 | 170 | Over | 44 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 27-32 | 84.4% | 55 | 14 | 21 | | DALLAS | 112 | -5 | SU ATS | 39 | 35-97 | 36.1% | 3-25 | 12.0% | 39-44 | 88.6% | 64 | 18 | 12 | 7/12/2017 | DALLAS | 84 | -3 | Over | 50 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | | CHICAGO | 90 | 173 | SU ATS | 46 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 49 | 10 | 21 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 15-8 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 42-30 against the money line (+17.1 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 80.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 47-36 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-20 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 98.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Stocks is 2-14 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 2-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 2-11 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 1-7 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 92.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Stocks is 2-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 94.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Stocks is 4-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Williams is 17-30 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in July games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 4-16 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games on Friday as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-21 against the money line (-16.8 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 43-55 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 82.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-31 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-30 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 5-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-34 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 46-69 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 35-51 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 30-45 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 35-51 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 27-44 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 18-34 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-40 against the money line (-24.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.1, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-48 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-25 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 29-46 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-39 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 44-61 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 31-45 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 53-74 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 33-49 against the money line (-26.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-42 against the money line (-23.4 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 31-45 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 69-90 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 81.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-33 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 39-52 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 29-44 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 58-92 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 81.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-35 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 33-57 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 41 times, while the home underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 9 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 07/05/2018 - Jamierra Faulkner is out for season ( ACL ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:01:37 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|