| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
CHICAGO |
|
|
155.5
| 75
Final
81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 677 | CONNECTICUT | +170 | | 678 | CHICAGO | -200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(59-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(76-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.8%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(60-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(61-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.2%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(49-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(43-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.2%, +30 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(47-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.5%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(42-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(45-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +31 units. Rating = 4*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(49-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.4%, +29.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(43-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.6%, +29.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +27.9 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half.
(58-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(121-88 since 1997.) (57.9%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(73-45 since 1997.) (61.9%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, with a losing record.
(27-20 since 1997.) (57.4%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(108-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 77 | | 28-66 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 15-18 | 80.9% | 45 | 11 | 16 | | CHICAGO | 79 | | 29-69 | 42.1% | 7-21 | 32.3% | 14-16 | 83.7% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 538 times, while CONNECTICUT won 441 times.
Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 19-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 117-83 against the money line (+27.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 96-54 against the money line (+31.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.4 | CONNECTICUT is 27-12 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 71.7 | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 73.5 | CHICAGO is 151-202 against the money line (-67.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 82.0 | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-8.0 Units) in home games when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.0, OPPONENT 85.3 | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 83.0 | CHICAGO is 4-7 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 86.5 | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 86.5 | CHICAGO is 100-149 against the money line (-55.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.2 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 37-55 against the money line (-36.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | CONNECTICUT is 4-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 86.8 | CONNECTICUT is 10-21 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 85.8 | CONNECTICUT is 2-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 92-74 against the money line (+31.0 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.8 | CHICAGO is 24-12 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 81.7 | CHICAGO is 85-65 against the money line (+37.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 77.8 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 65-38 against the money line (+19.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+9.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-7 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-11 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 102-167 against the money line (-65.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 102-141 against the money line (-59.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 117-171 against the money line (-56.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 70-67 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 97-97 against the money line (-44.4 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 8-12 against the money line (-11.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 51-49 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-53 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+5.8 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-17 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 55-44 against the money line (+16.5 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-16 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in home games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) as a home favorite this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 36-31 against the money line (-26.9 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.2 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-11.1 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-41 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 0-5 against the money line (-6.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 0-5 against the money line (-6.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-65 against the money line (-40.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 50-88 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-57 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 1-5 against the money line (-7.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-22 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in home games after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 0-4 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 36-47 against the money line (-33.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 25-31 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 27-30 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 59-67 against the money line (-36.3 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 46-59 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 16-30 against the money line (-29.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 19-9 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+19.1 Units) off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 25-13 against the money line (+22.9 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-3 | +5.8 | 8-3 | 3-8 | 80.0 | 39.2 | 43.8% | 45.7 | 74.0 | 36.2 | 41.0% | 36.7 | | Road Games | 3-2 | +1.8 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 79.0 | 39.0 | 41.3% | 50.4 | 73.6 | 35.0 | 39.0% | 39.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 77.0 | 37.2 | 43.1% | 41.0 | 76.0 | 38.0 | 43.1% | 38.0 | | Division Games | 4-0 | +4 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 84.2 | 45.0 | 48.2% | 46.2 | 69.7 | 37.5 | 38.7% | 33.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 39.2 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 8-21 | 37.6% | 13-17 | 78.3% | 46 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.8 | 30-71 | 42.7% | 7-22 | 33.7% | 14-18 | 80.7% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.0 | 39.0 | 30-72 | 41.3% | 8-24 | 35.6% | 11-15 | 77.0% | 50 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.0 | 36.2 | 27-65 | 41.0% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 14-17 | 83.5% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.5 | 42.3 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.6 | 35.0 | 26-66 | 39.0% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-7 | -5.7 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 80.2 | 42.1 | 40.9% | 44.2 | 78.9 | 40.3 | 41.7% | 44.8 | | Home Games | 1-5 | -8.2 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 80.5 | 40.3 | 40.8% | 42.7 | 83.5 | 42.7 | 44.1% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 83.4 | 44.4 | 42.7% | 42.4 | 77.8 | 42.2 | 43.0% | 44.6 | | Division Games | 4-2 | -0.7 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 83.0 | 47.3 | 41.0% | 45.5 | 78.5 | 39.8 | 40.7% | 45.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.2 | 42.1 | 28-68 | 40.9% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 18-20 | 86.1% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 42.6 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 8-22 | 37.3% | 16-19 | 81.8% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.5 | 40.3 | 28-70 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 35.8% | 17-18 | 93.6% | 43 | 11 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.9 | 40.3 | 29-70 | 41.7% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 14-19 | 73.6% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 17 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 40.1 | 29-70 | 41.3% | 7-22 | 33.0% | 14-18 | 76.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 83.5 | 42.7 | 31-69 | 44.1% | 9-20 | 44.2% | 13-17 | 79.2% | 42 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 17 | 7 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.5, CHICAGO 72.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 78-67 | W | -140 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 54 | 20 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 32 | 13 | | 5/16/2021 | PHOENIX | 86-78 | W | -115 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 44 | 12 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 35 | 15 | | 5/19/2021 | INDIANA | 88-67 | W | -300 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 41 | 13 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 35 | 12 | | 5/21/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 84-67 | W | +135 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 59 | 11 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 31 | 6 | | 5/23/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 72-65 | W | +180 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 54 | 8 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 37 | 14 | | 5/25/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 87-90 | L | +145 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 46 | 16 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 12 | | 5/28/2021 | WASHINGTON | 86-81 | W | -330 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 42 | 14 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 41 | 10 | | 5/30/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-79 | L | -140 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 39 | 11 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 51 | 14 | | 6/1/2021 | LAS VEGAS | 74-67 | W | +100 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 14 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 33 | 12 | | 6/5/2021 | NEW YORK | 85-64 | W | -500 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 48 | 11 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 27 | 15 | | 6/13/2021 | SEATTLE | 66-89 | L | +175 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 17 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 38 | 8 | | 6/17/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2021 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 70-56 | W | -140 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 44 | 14 | 18-72 | 25.0% | 54 | 14 | | 5/19/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 85-77 | W | -175 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 60 | 24 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 49 | 18 | | 5/23/2021 | NEW YORK | 85-93 | L | -220 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 42 | 12 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 48 | 22 | | 5/25/2021 | ATLANTA | 83-90 | L | -250 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 47 | 21 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 39 | 10 | | 5/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 61-76 | L | -175 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 38 | 27 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 36 | 19 | | 5/30/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 79-82 | L | -155 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 51 | 22 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 19 | | 6/1/2021 | PHOENIX | 83-84 | L | -120 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 36 | 10 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 48 | 19 | | 6/3/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 74-77 | L | +100 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 48 | 8 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 50 | 17 | | 6/5/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 63-68 | L | +100 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 49 | 18 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 48 | 11 | | 6/9/2021 | INDIANA | 92-76 | W | -650 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 41 | 16 | | 6/12/2021 | @ INDIANA | 83-79 | W | -650 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 38 | 16 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 41 | 17 | | 6/15/2021 | @ MINNESOTA | 105-89 | W | +145 | 40-70 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 20 | | 6/17/2021 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2021 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2021 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CHICAGO is 25-29 (-0.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 3-3 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 14-13 (-1.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 1-0 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/15/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 94 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 27-29 | 93.1% | 49 | 17 | 12 | | N | CHICAGO | 81 | -2 | Over | 41 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8/14/2020 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 168 | SU ATS | 37 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 53 | 12 | 8 | | N | CHICAGO | 74 | -6 | Under | 28 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 8/8/2020 | CHICAGO | 100 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 29-32 | 90.6% | 35 | 7 | 21 | | N | CONNECTICUT | 93 | 167 | Over | 46 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 27 | 4 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 102-79 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in all games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 51-40 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-0 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-28 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-13 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 18-4 against the money line (+16.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 59-45 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 86-61 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 84-54 against the money line (+23.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 52-34 against the money line (+24.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 64-38 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 80-55 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 87-63 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 82-61 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 0-4 against the money line (-11.1 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 19-24 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-19 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 22-26 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-23 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 11-18 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Wade is 19-9 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 220 times, while the road underdog won straight up 102 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 15 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/16/2021 - Alyssa Thomas is "?" Thursday vs Chicago Sky ( Achilles ) | | [F] 06/07/2021 - Jonquel Jones is out indefinitely, could be through 6/29 ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 05/12/2021 - Gabby Williams is out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:22:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|