| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
DALLAS |
|
|
167.5
| 85
Final
73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 675 | MINNESOTA | +155 | | 676 | DALLAS | -175 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(42-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (87.5%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(71-45 since 1997.) (61.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(48-28 since 1997.) (63.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(28-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.7%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, on Thursday nights.
(31-10 since 1997.) (75.6%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(44-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +31 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in June games.
(36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in June games.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a favorite, in May, June, or July games.
(22-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(31-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(43-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after going under the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%).
(29-16 since 1997.) (64.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, in May, June, or July games.
(58-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +29.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 84 | | 30-66 | 45.2% | 8-23 | 33.4% | 16-19 | 84.6% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | DALLAS | 90 | | 32-72 | 44.9% | 9-25 | 37.2% | 16-19 | 81.7% | 43 | 11 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, DALLAS won the game straight up 635 times, while MINNESOTA won 337 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 111-39 against the money line (+81.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 263-88 against the money line (+122.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 89.2, OPPONENT 80.3 | DALLAS is 51-88 against the money line (-39.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.0 | DALLAS is 40-86 against the money line (-55.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 89.8 | DALLAS is 3-17 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 93.3 |
|
MINNESOTA is 103-118 against the money line (-51.8 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 79.1 | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.1 | MINNESOTA is 85-96 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | MINNESOTA is 38-45 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 83.5 | MINNESOTA is 132-118 against the money line (-51.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 83.5 | MINNESOTA is 11-16 against the money line (-13.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 86.7 | MINNESOTA is 4-14 against the money line (-14.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 90.3 | MINNESOTA is 68-82 against the money line (-47.0 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | MINNESOTA is 22-30 against the money line (-17.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 83.7 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 40-68 against the money line (-31.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-81 against the money line (-32.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-86 against the money line (-34.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 39-77 against the money line (-37.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 178-127 against the money line (-65.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.2, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 108-134 against the money line (-47.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 225-223 against the money line (-93.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 317-293 against the money line (-95.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 160-132 against the money line (-56.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 71-71 against the money line (-42.4 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 39-43 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 54-69 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 225-201 against the money line (-71.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 159-86 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-39 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-31 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 24-45 against the money line (-26.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-15 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 42-65 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 45-70 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 37-59 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 40-64 against the money line (-35.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 43-74 against the money line (-41.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 34-54 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 25-40 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 46-72 against the money line (-38.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-42 against the money line (-26.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-32 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 89.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-24 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 249-223 against the money line (-79.7 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 217-189 against the money line (-82.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-90 against the money line (-37.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-32 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in road games off an upset loss as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-15 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 70-83 against the money line (-41.2 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 79-116 against the money line (-45.5 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 158-176 against the money line (-76.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-12 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 78.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-6 | -4.1 | 3-7 | 6-4 | 81.5 | 41.5 | 43.1% | 43.7 | 82.7 | 42.0 | 44.1% | 40.4 | | Road Games | 0-3 | -4.5 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 76.0 | 39.7 | 38.5% | 41.7 | 84.3 | 48.0 | 45.4% | 41.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 87.2 | 45.8 | 46.7% | 43.0 | 83.6 | 43.2 | 43.9% | 37.4 | | Division Games | 1-3 | -2.2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 76.2 | 39.2 | 41.1% | 45.5 | 78.2 | 39.7 | 42.9% | 40.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.5 | 41.5 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 80.9% | 44 | 7 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 41.1 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 80.0% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.0 | 39.7 | 26-68 | 38.5% | 5-23 | 21.4% | 18-21 | 87.3% | 42 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 42.0 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 9-24 | 36.9% | 13-17 | 79.0% | 40 | 7 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.7 | 30-70 | 42.7% | 8-23 | 35.9% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.3 | 48.0 | 31-69 | 45.4% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-15 | 93.5% | 42 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 5-6 | +2 | 8-3 | 5-4 | 85.5 | 41.4 | 41.7% | 47.3 | 83.2 | 40.9 | 42.7% | 43.8 | | Home Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 87.0 | 40.0 | 40.7% | 47.3 | 86.0 | 38.7 | 43.7% | 42.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.4 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 82.0 | 41.0 | 39.7% | 49.8 | 79.4 | 40.2 | 41.8% | 43.8 | | Division Games | 5-4 | +4.3 | 8-1 | 4-4 | 85.0 | 41.0 | 41.3% | 49.2 | 80.7 | 39.8 | 41.7% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.5 | 41.4 | 31-74 | 41.7% | 8-24 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 82.1% | 47 | 11 | 18 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.1 | 40.6 | 30-71 | 41.8% | 7-22 | 32.1% | 14-18 | 81.3% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.0 | 40.0 | 31-75 | 40.7% | 10-27 | 35.4% | 16-19 | 85.7% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.2 | 40.9 | 29-68 | 42.7% | 7-23 | 30.5% | 18-23 | 77.0% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.4 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 86.0 | 38.7 | 30-69 | 43.7% | 8-26 | 32.5% | 18-22 | 81.5% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 5 | 10 | 8 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71.2, DALLAS 73 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2021 | PHOENIX | 75-77 | L | -115 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 49 | 14 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 48 | 11 | | 5/18/2021 | @ NEW YORK | 75-86 | L | -210 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 41 | 10 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 48 | 16 | | 5/20/2021 | SEATTLE | 78-90 | L | +170 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 17 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 39 | 17 | | 5/28/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 72-82 | L | +200 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 12 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 43 | 12 | | 5/30/2021 | CONNECTICUT | 79-74 | W | +120 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 51 | 14 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 39 | 11 | | 6/4/2021 | ATLANTA | 86-84 | W | -270 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 37 | 20 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 18 | | 6/6/2021 | ATLANTA | 100-80 | W | -200 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | | 6/8/2021 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-85 | L | -140 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 46 | 21 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 12 | | 6/12/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 80-64 | W | -450 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 52 | 22 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 32 | 12 | | 6/15/2021 | CHICAGO | 89-105 | L | -165 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 43 | 20 | 40-70 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | | 6/17/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2021 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2021 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2021 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2021 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-71 | W | +200 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 52 | 26 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 38 | 15 | | 5/22/2021 | SEATTLE | 97-100 | L | +250 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 52 | 16 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 45 | 9 | | 5/24/2021 | @ NEW YORK | 81-88 | L | -110 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 12 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 42 | 14 | | 5/27/2021 | @ ATLANTA | 95-101 | L | -115 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 35 | 10 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 55 | 11 | | 5/29/2021 | PHOENIX | 85-89 | L | -105 | 29-78 | 37.2% | 40 | 4 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 51 | 10 | | 6/1/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 79-69 | W | +100 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 50 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 32 | 12 | | 6/4/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 102-105 | L | +350 | 43-96 | 44.8% | 55 | 13 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 47 | 16 | | 6/6/2021 | @ SEATTLE | 68-67 | W | +325 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 46 | 13 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 11 | | 6/8/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 85-81 | W | +105 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 9 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 42 | 7 | | 6/11/2021 | @ PHOENIX | 77-59 | W | +105 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 53 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 36 | 13 | | 6/13/2021 | @ LAS VEGAS | 78-85 | L | +300 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 46 | 10 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 49 | 16 | | 6/17/2021 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2021 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2021 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2021 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2021 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2021 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 39-13 (+23.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 4-1 (+2.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 19-9 (+12.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 1-1 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/4/2020 | MINNESOTA | 88 | -4 | SU ATS | 41 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 13 | 12 | | N | DALLAS | 75 | 165 | Under | 49 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 30 | 3 | 10 | 8/19/2020 | DALLAS | 84 | 156.5 | Over | 43 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 40 | 10 | 10 | | N | MINNESOTA | 91 | -6 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 14-23 | 60.9% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 37 | 8 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 158-85 against the money line (+25.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 125-58 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 188-95 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 138-65 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-51 against the money line (+27.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 196-98 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 152-68 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 118-52 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 97-39 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-30 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-23 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 152-70 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 92-34 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 86-32 against the money line (+22.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 149-69 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-15 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 200-91 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 122-49 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 128-60 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 46-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 33-34 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-33 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 8-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in road games off an upset loss as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 20-23 against the money line (-15.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 134-91 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 40-43 against the money line (-24.1 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 143-98 against the money line (-38.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 92-78 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 58-46 against the money line (-27.4 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 85-73 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 219 times, while the road underdog won straight up 130 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/14/2021 - Aerial Powers is out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [F] 06/14/2021 - Natalie Achonwa is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [F] 06/11/2021 - Jessica Shepard is out indefinitely ( Groin ) | | [G] 05/12/2021 - Rennia Davis is out for season ( Foot ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 12:06:04 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|