| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON CONNECTICUT |
|
| 173 | 95 Final 91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
609 | WASHINGTON | +375 | 610 | CONNECTICUT | -550 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential). (252-85 since 1997.) (74.8%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (161-31 since 1997.) (83.9%, +75.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (174-47 since 1997.) (78.7%, +75.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (133-33 since 1997.) (80.1%, +61.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (123-21 since 1997.) (85.4%, +60.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (42-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (42-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (212-153 since 1997.) (58.1%, +59.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (120-31 since 1997.) (79.5%, +56.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (110-22 since 1997.) (83.3%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (189-109 since 1997.) (63.4%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (85-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (99-24 since 1997.) (80.5%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (91-18 since 1997.) (83.5%, +48.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (99-24 since 1997.) (80.5%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (138-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season. (38-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (113-43 since 1997.) (72.4%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (35-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.6%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (35-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.6%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (69-13 since 1997.) (84.1%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (54-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (109-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (45-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.8%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (45-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (90%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (42-4 since 1997.) (91.3%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (42-4 since 1997.) (91.3%, +34 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more. (27-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.1%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a win by 10 points or more. (27-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.1%, +22.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (51-12 since 1997.) (81%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Wednesday nights. (41-20 since 1997.) (67.2%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (34-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (97.1%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (34-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (97.1%, +32 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (176-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +38.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (43-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%). (44-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (88%, +34.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.9%, +26.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 straight games being outrebounded by opponent by 10 or more. (30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +24 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (34-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +22.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (34-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more. (25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (48-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +31.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (51-30 since 1997.) (63%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (97-54 since 1997.) (64.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 3 or more days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (43-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 79 | | 29-70 | 40.7% | 7-22 | 33.8% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 42 | 11 | 12 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | | 34-73 | 46.3% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 70.5% | 49 | 14 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 753 times, while WASHINGTON won 228 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 20-9 against the money line (+10.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.3, OPPONENT 82.7 | CONNECTICUT is 60-69 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 77.9 | CONNECTICUT is 2-8 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.2, OPPONENT 80.5 | CONNECTICUT is 64-155 against the money line (-132.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 86.7 |
|
WASHINGTON is 84-127 against the money line (-58.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 6-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 85.9 | WASHINGTON is 73-118 against the money line (-50.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 75.2 | WASHINGTON is 8-18 against the money line (-14.1 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 86.1 | WASHINGTON is 10-20 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.4, OPPONENT 88.4 | WASHINGTON is 5-17 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 91.4 | WASHINGTON is 19-33 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 84.3 | WASHINGTON is 40-111 against the money line (-79.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.3 | WASHINGTON is 22-34 against the money line (-16.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 86.1 | CONNECTICUT is 78-34 against the money line (+45.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 78-44 against the money line (+27.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 75.0 | CONNECTICUT is 121-101 against the money line (+27.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.8, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 65-37 against the money line (+20.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 24-7 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.6, OPPONENT 80.5 | CONNECTICUT is 24-2 against the money line (+20.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.4, OPPONENT 79.3 | CONNECTICUT is 24-12 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 79.9 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 33-118 against the money line (-48.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 131-215 against the money line (-67.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-17 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-30 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-24 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 213-320 against the money line (-109.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-77 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 141-194 against the money line (-59.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-122 against the money line (-54.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-52 against the money line (-33.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-23 against the money line (-18.7 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-24 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-21 against the money line (+19.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-11 against the money line (+17.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-19 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-26 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-26 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 15-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 18-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-10 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-10 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-7 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in home games vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-20 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after 3 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after 4 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after 5 straight games with 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 283-415 against the money line (-124.2 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-52 against the money line (-25.4 Units) on Wednesday since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 135-199 against the money line (-65.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 43-67 against the money line (-31.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-112 against the money line (-53.9 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 63-120 against the money line (-62.8 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 47-93 against the money line (-48.0 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 67-134 against the money line (-45.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-20 against the money line (-13.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-93 against the money line (-35.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 40-72 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 128-212 against the money line (-73.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-140 against the money line (-51.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-23 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 151-263 against the money line (-99.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 88-164 against the money line (-63.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-87 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-224 against the money line (-76.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-118 against the money line (-53.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 149-247 against the money line (-72.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 42-91 against the money line (-40.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-2 against the money line (+9.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-13 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 93.4, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-20 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-22 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-6 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-20 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-24 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-6 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-5 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-4 | +0.5 | 4-5 | 5-4 | 81.9 | 40.0 | 45.1% | 37.7 | 82.7 | 41.2 | 46.0% | 43.0 | Road Games | 2-2 | -0.2 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 86.5 | 44.0 | 47.1% | 39.5 | 86.2 | 43.5 | 47.1% | 37.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 79.4 | 40.4 | 44.5% | 35.8 | 87.4 | 45.4 | 46.8% | 44.4 | Division Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 79.7 | 41.3 | 42.6% | 36.3 | 82.3 | 41.0 | 46.2% | 47.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.0 | 30-67 | 45.1% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 14-17 | 81.0% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.5 | 44.0 | 30-64 | 47.1% | 7-17 | 42.9% | 18-24 | 77.9% | 39 | 9 | 13 | 24 | 5 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 41.2 | 31-67 | 46.0% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 16-21 | 77.3% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.2 | 43.5 | 31-66 | 47.1% | 6-21 | 31.0% | 18-21 | 84.5% | 38 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-1 | +2.3 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 92.6 | 45.5 | 47.0% | 50.5 | 76.9 | 41.2 | 40.3% | 39.5 | Home Games | 4-0 | +2 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 94.5 | 46.5 | 50.9% | 45.7 | 77.7 | 40.0 | 39.4% | 39.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 90.4 | 44.4 | 44.2% | 53.8 | 75.8 | 41.6 | 40.4% | 40.2 | Division Games | 4-1 | +0.3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 89.8 | 45.0 | 44.4% | 53.0 | 76.2 | 41.6 | 40.9% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 92.6 | 45.5 | 35-75 | 47.0% | 8-21 | 35.5% | 15-21 | 71.1% | 50 | 12 | 21 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.5 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.7% | 6-20 | 32.7% | 16-20 | 78.1% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 94.5 | 46.5 | 35-70 | 50.9% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 16-22 | 75.9% | 46 | 9 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.9 | 41.2 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 5-17 | 33.1% | 18-22 | 79.7% | 39 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 39.2 | 29-68 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.7 | 40.0 | 26-67 | 39.4% | 6-16 | 36.5% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 39 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.3, CONNECTICUT 69.5 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2018 | INDIANA | 82-75 | W | -950 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 15 | 5/22/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 75-70 | W | | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 22 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 49 | 15 | 5/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 93-84 | W | -210 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 41 | 12 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 31 | 12 | 5/27/2018 | MINNESOTA | 90-78 | W | +175 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 13 | 5/29/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 77-81 | L | +250 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 39 | 14 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 16 | 5/30/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 103-95 | W | +280 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 42 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 29 | 13 | 6/1/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 73-85 | L | -300 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 48 | 14 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-88 | L | +210 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 6/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 80-88 | L | +155 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 27 | 11 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 17 | 6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/20/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 101-65 | W | | 37-79 | 46.8% | 51 | 8 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 53 | 19 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 102-94 | W | -200 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 40 | 20 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 18 | 11 | 5/26/2018 | INDIANA | 86-77 | W | | 32-66 | 48.5% | 44 | 13 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 44 | 18 | 6/1/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 110-72 | W | -500 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 56 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 6/3/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-64 | W | -270 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 6/5/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-82 | L | -270 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | 6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -220 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | W | -250 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 46-31 (+9.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 4-3 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 28-11 (+10.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 2-1 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 59 | 14 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 172 | Under | 35 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 8/29/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 55 | 13 | 7 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -2 | Under | 38 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 53 | 9 | 11 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 168 | Over | 58 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 11 | 7 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 162.5 | ATS | 32 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 49 | 13 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -7.5 | SU Under | 34 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 48 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 197-146 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-30 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-47 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 55-40 against the money line (+21.3 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-3 against the money line (+12.2 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 82.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 25-25 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-17 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-33 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-11 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 7-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-16 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 55-45 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 5-0 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 81.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 47-43 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 75-48 against the money line (+30.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-17 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 52-45 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 25-16 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 5-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Thibault is 10-20 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 24-45 against the money line (-21.8 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 30-40 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 29-42 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-37 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 43-60 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-28 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 65-78 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-5 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-20 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-21 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-17 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 34-27 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 33-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-22 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 27-21 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 32-26 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 28-20 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-10 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 31-20 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 31-24 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-5 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-13 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-15 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 32-24 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 33-21 against the money line (+19.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 20-11 against the money line (+17.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 18-9 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 30-19 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 17-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 34-26 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-26 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 29-25 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 83 times, while the road underdog won straight up 15 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the road underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 05/19/2018 - Tayler Hill is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [C] 05/19/2018 - Emma Meesseman is out for season ( Personal ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 9:59:29 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|