| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
MINNESOTA |
|
|
168
| 78
Final
81 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 639 | CHICAGO | -120 | | 640 | MINNESOTA | +100 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(61-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(42-35 since 1997.) (54.5%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(54-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(71-44 since 1997.) (61.7%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off an upset win over a division rival as a home underdog.
(58-44 since 1997.) (56.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in July games.
(42-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.3%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after 2 straight games making 50% of their shots or better.
(37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(27-8 since 1997.) (77.1%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +15.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +18.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win against a division rival against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(25-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +11 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(39-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +15.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 80 points or more.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(62-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +16.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(20-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +13 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(43-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +48.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games against opponent hot team - having won 8 or more of their last 10 games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in non-conference games, after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(55-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(56-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home win, in July games.
(21-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(34-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.3%, +32.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in May, June, or July games.
(119-159 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.8%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(187-65 since 1997.) (74.2%, +75.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(166-41 since 1997.) (80.2%, +72.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(139-31 since 1997.) (81.8%, +62.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(153-49 since 1997.) (75.7%, +61.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(160-54 since 1997.) (74.8%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(153-51 since 1997.) (75%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(104-20 since 1997.) (83.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(137-43 since 1997.) (76.1%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(98-28 since 1997.) (77.8%, +50.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(89-18 since 1997.) (83.2%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(109-32 since 1997.) (77.3%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(41-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.6%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(136-97 since 1997.) (58.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, in July games.
(26-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(126-91 since 1997.) (58.1%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(79-50 since 1997.) (61.2%, +30.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(23-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(38-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record.
(37-6 since 1997.) (86%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(62-35 since 1997.) (63.9%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(75-49 since 1997.) (60.5%, +24.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(33-6 since 1997.) (84.6%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(47-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +32.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +19.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(32-14 since 1997.) (69.6%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(21-6 since 1997.) (77.8%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, in July games.
(45-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(31-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, in July games.
(42-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(66-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(66-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(66-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +31.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor offensive rebounding team - averaging <=9/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(27-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(32-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(31-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(50-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(32-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Wednesday nights.
(34-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(50-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(30-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +16.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(39-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +20.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(55-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(88-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 85 | | 33-68 | 48.2% | 8-22 | 37.1% | 12-14 | 84.5% | 40 | 7 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 82 | | 30-70 | 43.2% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 589 times, while MINNESOTA won 380 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 15-9 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 81-56 against the money line (+21.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 78.7 | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 93.9, OPPONENT 87.4 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 77.2 | CHICAGO is 87-76 against the money line (+27.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 83.4 | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.1, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 91.5, OPPONENT 84.3 | MINNESOTA is 101-122 against the money line (-86.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 75.8 | MINNESOTA is 73-101 against the money line (-64.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | MINNESOTA is 92-103 against the money line (-42.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 78-49 against the money line (-41.2 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.7 | MINNESOTA is 3-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 86.6 | MINNESOTA is 6-16 against the money line (-11.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 90.3 | MINNESOTA is 0-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 86.9 |
|
CHICAGO is 25-54 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 59-100 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | CHICAGO is 25-27 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 87.5 | CHICAGO is 56-91 against the money line (-39.2 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 82.2 | CHICAGO is 113-156 against the money line (-54.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.1 | MINNESOTA is 17-6 against the money line (+11.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 76.9 | MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 25-12 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 81.4 | MINNESOTA is 27-15 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 78.4 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 26-13 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 15-6 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-7 against the money line (+8.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-9 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 25-12 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 36-36 against the money line (+29.9 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 108-131 against the money line (-44.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 50-63 against the money line (-27.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-85 against the money line (-35.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 48-48 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-39 against the money line (-21.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 30-64 against the money line (-40.7 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 118-112 against the money line (-63.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 69-68 against the money line (-46.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-8 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 65-78 against the money line (-53.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-6 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 26-16 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-17 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 28-18 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-7 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-6 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 23-16 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 28-18 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-5 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 20-10 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 13-7 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 28-16 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-5 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 27-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 18-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 26-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 15-5 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 19-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 20-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 20-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 28-13 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 13-5 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-4 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 44-35 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 147-104 against the money line (-58.7 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 88-80 against the money line (-43.3 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) against Eastern conference opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 252-235 against the money line (-74.7 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.0 Units) in non-conference games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 203-197 against the money line (-77.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-44 against the money line (-34.2 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 48-66 against the money line (-36.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 9-23 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in road games on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 3-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-11 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 35-44 against the money line (-23.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 129-168 against the money line (-52.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-15 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 52-72 against the money line (-38.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 143-176 against the money line (-54.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 5*) | CHICAGO is 74-97 against the money line (-35.7 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-36 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-36 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-12 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-7 against the money line (+9.3 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 74-28 against the money line (+38.5 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 104-55 against the money line (+30.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 91.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 46-23 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 86-47 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games off a win by 20 points or more over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 44-16 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in home games off a home win by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 81-34 against the money line (+33.9 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 157-95 against the money line (+26.7 Units) off a home win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-11 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-14 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 24-13 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 21-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-10 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-18 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-14 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 19-13 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-10 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 98-47 against the money line (+30.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 79-33 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 108-57 against the money line (+24.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-9 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-9 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-9 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-9 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-7 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 20-12 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 28-21 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-21 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 28-21 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 10-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 39-19 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 45-25 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 14-7 against the money line (+8.5 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.8, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 32-16 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 20-7 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 16-5 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 11-5 against the money line (+7.4 Units) in road games off a home win as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 33-25 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 53-32 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 48-26 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 42-24 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 24-17 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 36-20 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 10-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 34-23 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 21-6 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 17-12 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 24-20 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 54-33 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-9 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.9, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 45-22 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 27-15 against the money line (+15.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 35-22 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 26-14 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 40-23 against the money line (+14.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-10 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 55-38 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 111-65 against the money line (-31.3 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 111-65 against the money line (-31.3 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 115-99 against the money line (-29.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 76-67 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 49-47 against the money line (-23.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-35 against the money line (-23.7 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 147-105 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 54-45 against the money line (-23.1 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-41 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-46 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-65 against the money line (-29.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 27-39 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Wade is 15-21 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 7-15 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 2-9 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Wade is 8-8 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 283-158 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 147-54 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 147-54 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-46 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 111-59 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-36 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 124-52 against the money line (+34.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 94-35 against the money line (+35.4 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 72-24 against the money line (+40.5 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 91-33 against the money line (+40.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 94-29 against the money line (+46.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 93-66 against the money line (+11.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 52-23 against the money line (+19.0 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-33 against the money line (+13.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 74-44 against the money line (+25.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 70-23 against the money line (+27.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-7 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in home games off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 11-1 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games off a win by 20 points or more over a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 57-15 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 71-25 against the money line (+17.4 Units) off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 72-19 against the money line (+38.0 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 115-42 against the money line (+34.4 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 113-47 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 122-62 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 211-105 against the money line (+28.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 178-90 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 155-74 against the money line (+34.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 133-59 against the money line (+36.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 218-111 against the money line (+33.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 173-78 against the money line (+37.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 136-62 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 113-48 against the money line (+35.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 93-38 against the money line (+33.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 83-30 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 168-82 against the money line (+31.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-41 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 67-22 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 71-17 against the money line (+34.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 95-39 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 74-29 against the money line (+36.4 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 168-84 against the money line (+33.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 98-47 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 64-27 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 99-48 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 138-69 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 192-93 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 70-25 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-14 against the money line (+21.4 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 59-21 against the money line (+20.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 69-24 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 92-29 against the money line (+21.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 119-44 against the money line (+17.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 89-27 against the money line (+24.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 222-122 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 160-70 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 66 times, while the home underdog won straight up 66 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 5 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [FW] 06/21/2022 - Napheesa Collier is out indefinitely ( Maternity List ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 1:59:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|