| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA NEW YORK |
|
| 158 | 90 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | ATLANTA | +135 | 602 | NEW YORK | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (298-99 since 1997.) (75.1%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (293-95 since 1997.) (75.5%, +92.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-78 since 1997.) (76.2%, +90.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (250-78 since 1997.) (76.2%, +90.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (250-78 since 1997.) (76.2%, +90.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (254-82 since 1997.) (75.6%, +89.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (254-82 since 1997.) (75.6%, +89.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (254-82 since 1997.) (75.6%, +89.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (283-122 since 1997.) (69.9%, +87.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (75-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +42.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (98-52 since 1997.) (65.3%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (98-52 since 1997.) (65.3%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two good free throw shooting teams (76-80%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (82-46 since 1997.) (64.1%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (85-42 since 1997.) (66.9%, +38.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two good FT shooting teams (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (61-30 since 1997.) (67%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (92-49 since 1997.) (65.2%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (106-62 since 1997.) (63.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (112-70 since 1997.) (61.5%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (129-89 since 1997.) (59.2%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (117-76 since 1997.) (60.6%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season. (95-57 since 1997.) (62.5%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (92-54 since 1997.) (63%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (117-78 since 1997.) (60%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (51-48 since 1997.) (51.5%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more. (95-62 since 1997.) (60.5%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (84-49 since 1997.) (63.2%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (75-41 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (81-46 since 1997.) (63.8%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (78-49 since 1997.) (61.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (69-37 since 1997.) (65.1%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (81-49 since 1997.) (62.3%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (67-37 since 1997.) (64.4%, +31.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (93-61 since 1997.) (60.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (20-12 since 1997.) (62.5%, +28.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (23-14 since 1997.) (62.2%, +28.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (49-22 since 1997.) (69%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (54-27 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (69-42 since 1997.) (62.2%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (33-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +18 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (50-25 since 1997.) (66.7%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record. (51-28 since 1997.) (64.6%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (47-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (37-17 since 1997.) (68.5%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (53-30 since 1997.) (63.9%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (38-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.1%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +15.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (23-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +15.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as a road underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (37-21 since 1997.) (63.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (22-6 since 1997.) (78.6%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games. (27-11 since 1997.) (71.1%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +15.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +16.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival. (62-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.1%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win against a division rival against opponent after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points. (33-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (87-105 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.3%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 71 | | 25-69 | 36.8% | 6-22 | 29.2% | 14-18 | 76.5% | 43 | 12 | 13 | NEW YORK | 80 | | 29-70 | 41.6% | 7-20 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 80.2% | 51 | 15 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 722 times, while ATLANTA won 255 times. Edge against the money line=NEW YORK |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
NEW YORK is 6-19 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 84.4 | NEW YORK is 5-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.3 | NEW YORK is 76-108 against the money line (-44.8 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.7, OPPONENT 73.3 | NEW YORK is 0-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.5, OPPONENT 87.8 | NEW YORK is 1-7 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 86.3 | NEW YORK is 10-29 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 84.5 |
|
ATLANTA is 3-19 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.2, OPPONENT 79.5 | ATLANTA is 22-62 against the money line (-61.6 Units) when they make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.6, OPPONENT 79.8 | ATLANTA is 64-76 against the money line (-44.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 79.2 | ATLANTA is 1-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.2, OPPONENT 79.2 | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 81.4 | ATLANTA is 30-48 against the money line (-32.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.2 | ATLANTA is 1-14 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 87.8 | ATLANTA is 3-10 against the money line (-8.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 86.0 | ATLANTA is 1-11 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 68.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | NEW YORK is 102-36 against the money line (+79.4 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 66.5 | NEW YORK is 8-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 78.5 | NEW YORK is 95-72 against the money line (+28.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 72.9 | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 68.5 | NEW YORK is 20-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 76.8 | NEW YORK is 92-66 against the money line (+29.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 72.2 | NEW YORK is 139-138 against the money line (+24.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 82.3 | NEW YORK is 84-30 against the money line (+65.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 74.6 | NEW YORK is 29-20 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 84.3 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 25-13 against the money line (+12.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-15 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 4-19 against the money line (-13.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-19 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-36 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 0-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season. The average score was ATLANTA 67.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-24 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 5-13 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-18 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-15 against the money line (-12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 112-131 against the money line (-44.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 52-73 against the money line (-39.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 46-81 against the money line (-47.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 103-118 against the money line (-47.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 44-38 against the money line (-32.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 140-175 against the money line (-58.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 71-32 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 118-53 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 101-74 against the money line (+24.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 19-17 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-7 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-10 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 16-42 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 5-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-18 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.8, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 11-31 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-27 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-25 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-18 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-31 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 16-32 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 9-26 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 1-6 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 42-57 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 5-22 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 78-87 against the money line (-38.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 6*) | ATLANTA is 25-42 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-31 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after 5 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-11.2 Units) revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 71.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-32 against the money line (-19.0 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-28 against the money line (-21.0 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 35-50 against the money line (-26.8 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 69-85 against the money line (-36.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 49-67 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 100-127 against the money line (-53.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-44 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 3-19 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 69.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 2-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 2-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 67.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after playing a home game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 67.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 7*) | ATLANTA is 3-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-15 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-52 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-37 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-28 against the money line (-19.1 Units) after 5 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was NEW YORK 75.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 96-68 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 70-42 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 108-105 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 158-143 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-22 | -17.2 | 12-15 | 12-13 | 71.1 | 35.4 | 37.1% | 44.5 | 79.6 | 38.9 | 41.6% | 47.5 | Road Games | 1-12 | -9.4 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 71.5 | 34.8 | 38.0% | 42.5 | 81.2 | 37.8 | 42.4% | 47.0 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 78.4 | 42.4 | 40.2% | 41.6 | 86.0 | 39.2 | 42.5% | 49.0 | Division Games | 2-12 | -10 | 8-6 | 9-3 | 72.6 | 37.1 | 37.5% | 44.8 | 82.4 | 41.9 | 42.9% | 47.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.1 | 35.4 | 26-69 | 37.1% | 6-22 | 28.5% | 13-18 | 76.1% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 39.4 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 13-17 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.5 | 34.8 | 26-69 | 38.0% | 7-22 | 30.9% | 12-16 | 74.5% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.6 | 38.9 | 29-71 | 41.6% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 14-18 | 77.1% | 47 | 11 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 40 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 13-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.2 | 37.8 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 8-22 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 77.0% | 47 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-18 | +1.9 | 10-17 | 13-13 | 77.0 | 38.5 | 41.2% | 43.2 | 83.7 | 42.2 | 43.0% | 44.8 | Home Games | 4-8 | -1 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 76.2 | 39.2 | 41.0% | 44.8 | 82.8 | 40.2 | 42.6% | 45.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.3 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 74.6 | 38.6 | 41.2% | 43.6 | 82.0 | 39.8 | 42.1% | 42.2 | Division Games | 2-8 | -5.5 | 4-6 | 7-3 | 79.8 | 38.8 | 41.2% | 46.0 | 85.6 | 42.6 | 43.4% | 44.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 38.5 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 6-19 | 32.4% | 14-18 | 79.6% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 39.2 | 29-68 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-17 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.2 | 39.2 | 28-69 | 41.0% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 13-17 | 76.7% | 45 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.7 | 42.2 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 45 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 77.8 | 39.4 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 13-17 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.8 | 40.2 | 30-70 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 16-21 | 76.5% | 45 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 72.1, NEW YORK 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
7/14/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 71-76 | L | +135 | 25-76 | 32.9% | 63 | 11 | 30-87 | 34.5% | 52 | 5 | 7/17/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 76-77 | L | +210 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 46 | 8 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 52 | 17 | 7/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 69-98 | L | +350 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 40 | 14 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 8 | 7/21/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 65-93 | L | +650 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 39 | 15 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 44 | 11 | 7/23/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 66-78 | L | -105 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 12 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 13 | 7/31/2019 | @ INDIANA | 59-61 | L | +175 | 22-76 | 28.9% | 58 | 15 | 20-65 | 30.8% | 53 | 15 | 8/3/2019 | CHICAGO | 75-87 | L | +155 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 46 | 14 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 46 | 20 | 8/6/2019 | MINNESOTA | 69-85 | L | +175 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 51 | 10 | 8/10/2019 | @ INDIANA | 82-87 | L | +180 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 15 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 10 | 8/13/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | +650 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 41 | 10 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 50 | 12 | 8/16/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 68-77 | L | +145 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 40 | 13 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 45 | 12 | 8/20/2019 | CHICAGO | 83-87 | L | +180 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 42 | 14 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 50 | 14 | 8/23/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/5/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/14/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 69-78 | L | +180 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 38 | 19 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 43 | 16 | 7/20/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 83-78 | W | +105 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 42 | 15 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 39 | 11 | 7/24/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 63-70 | L | +375 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 49 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 55 | 11 | 8/1/2019 | @ DALLAS | 64-87 | L | +100 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 39 | 21 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 18 | 8/4/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 79-94 | L | +200 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 17 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 41 | 9 | 8/7/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 92-101 | L | +250 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 45 | 16 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 41 | 8 | 8/11/2019 | SEATTLE | 69-84 | L | +155 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 18 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 43 | 11 | 8/13/2019 | MINNESOTA | 73-89 | L | +180 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 17 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 40 | 14 | 8/16/2019 | @ DALLAS | 77-83 | L | +155 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 16 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 12 | 8/18/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 72-78 | L | +175 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 43 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 46 | 11 | 8/20/2019 | @ INDIANA | 82-76 | W | +170 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 13 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 44 | 8 | 8/23/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 28-17 (+16.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 4-3 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 15-7 (+6.1 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2019 | NEW YORK | 74 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 1-11 | 9.1% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 54 | 10 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 58 | -4.5 | Under | 28 | 19-70 | 27.1% | 8-28 | 28.6% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | 8/12/2018 | ATLANTA | 86 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 39 | 7 | 6 | | NEW YORK | 77 | 159 | Over | 48 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 47 | 7 | 16 | 7/19/2018 | NEW YORK | 68 | 164.5 | Under | 31 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 43 | 7 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 82 | -7 | SU ATS | 50 | 28-88 | 31.8% | 9-30 | 30.0% | 17-25 | 68.0% | 68 | 21 | 12 | 6/19/2018 | ATLANTA | 72 | 150.5 | Over | 24 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 5-27 | 18.5% | 27-34 | 79.4% | 55 | 12 | 17 | | NEW YORK | 79 | -6 | SU ATS | 34 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 48 | 7 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Collen is 19-17 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 8-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 9-6 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 12-7 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 15-10 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 16-42 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 8-20 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 5-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after a division game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 4-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.1, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 5-17 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.1, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 7-14 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) in home games after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.8, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 2-8 against the money line (-7.3 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 12-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 11-31 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 10-27 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 8-25 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 8-18 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 12-31 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 9-26 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 4-12 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.6, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 5-15 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 6-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.7, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 4-19 against the money line (-13.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 8-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 7-19 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 12-36 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 4-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Collen is 3-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.5, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 8-22 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Collen is 4-17 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Collen is 2-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 210 times, while the road underdog won straight up 150 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[C] 08/22/2019 - Elizabeth Williams is "?" Friday vs NY Liberty ( Personal ) | [F] 05/10/2019 - Angel McCoughtry is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[G] 08/20/2019 - Asia Durr is "?" Friday vs Atlanta Dream ( Groin ) | [C] 05/24/2019 - Kiah Stokes is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 12:39:28 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|