| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA SEATTLE |
|
| 162.5 | 86 Final 88 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Bradenton, FL | | | | |
615 | MINNESOTA | +300 | 616 | SEATTLE | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (213-55 since 1997.) (79.5%, +73.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (238-88 since 1997.) (73%, +72.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (238-176 since 1997.) (57.5%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (186-130 since 1997.) (58.9%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (192-152 since 1997.) (55.8%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (114-82 since 1997.) (58.2%, +52.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (124-42 since 1997.) (74.7%, +52.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (101-33 since 1997.) (75.4%, +46.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (93-67 since 1997.) (58.1%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (87-63 since 1997.) (58%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in the conference finals. (89-29 since 1997.) (75.4%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss. (150-117 since 1997.) (56.2%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (129-104 since 1997.) (55.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a home loss against a division rival. (124-93 since 1997.) (57.1%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less. (80-51 since 1997.) (61.1%, +43.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals. (30-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (49-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less. (41-37 since 1997.) (52.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals. (32-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less. (54-32 since 1997.) (62.8%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (36-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a close loss by 3 points or less. (33-20 since 1997.) (62.3%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival. (76-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a home loss against a division rival. (39-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (46-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a home loss against a division rival. (36-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a loss against a division rival. (97-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 79 | | 30-66 | 45.1% | 8-22 | 33.8% | 12-15 | 80.8% | 40 | 10 | 15 | SEATTLE | 83 | | 30-68 | 44.1% | 9-22 | 39.0% | 14-17 | 81.6% | 43 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 592 times, while MINNESOTA won 380 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 111-38 against the money line (+82.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 12-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 76.6 | MINNESOTA is 13-5 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.4, OPPONENT 82.2 | SEATTLE is 48-92 against the money line (-77.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 78.5 | SEATTLE is 31-62 against the money line (-31.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 79.8 | SEATTLE is 7-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 86.5 |
|
MINNESOTA is 103-113 against the money line (-45.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 77.8 | MINNESOTA is 85-93 against the money line (-39.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 75.1 | MINNESOTA is 38-45 against the money line (-30.0 Units) in road games when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.2 | MINNESOTA is 11-22 against the money line (-20.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 85.6 | MINNESOTA is 5-16 against the money line (-17.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 89.0 | MINNESOTA is 153-134 against the money line (-64.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.9 | SEATTLE is 27-13 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 79.0 | SEATTLE is 16-2 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.2, OPPONENT 76.3 | SEATTLE is 10-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 73.5 | SEATTLE is 11-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 74.6 | SEATTLE is 17-8 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 77.4 | SEATTLE is 14-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 75.5 | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.5, OPPONENT 74.7 | SEATTLE is 13-6 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 75.0 | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 74.3 | SEATTLE is 43-17 against the money line (+19.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 81.9 | SEATTLE is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 90.9, OPPONENT 76.1 | SEATTLE is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 91.5, OPPONENT 76.1 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 12-38 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 67.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 14-21 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-27 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 80-82 against the money line (-40.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-73 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-23 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-31 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-24 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 144-137 against the money line (-57.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-39 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 156-159 against the money line (-68.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 222-217 against the money line (-89.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 217-203 against the money line (-71.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 313-287 against the money line (-92.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-53 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-24 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 53-77 against the money line (-33.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-111 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-32 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-56 against the money line (-41.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 7-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-24 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 221-195 against the money line (-68.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-20 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 51-65 against the money line (-27.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 36-21 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 191-172 against the money line (+26.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 32-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 34-14 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-8 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 27-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 39-21 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 13-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 35-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 32-12 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 51-42 against the money line (+21.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 80.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 32-13 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 33-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-9 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 35-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 29-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-8 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 32-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 27-14 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 13-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 90-36 against the money line (+28.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 93-48 against the money line (+24.2 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-6 against the money line (+15.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in the conference finals since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 62-33 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 155-81 against the money line (+29.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-10 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 105-47 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-35 against the money line (+26.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 70-25 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 67-29 against the money line (+28.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 24-44 against the money line (-23.1 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-15 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 66.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 67-89 against the money line (-36.1 Units) in road games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 237-222 against the money line (-78.1 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 23-22 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 192-184 against the money line (-75.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after 2 straight games where they were called for 15 or less fouls over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-89 against the money line (-36.6 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 71-82 against the money line (-39.1 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 86-91 against the money line (-49.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 50-58 against the money line (-29.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-62 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after a win by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 79-113 against the money line (-41.4 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 64-30 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 261-100 against the money line (+40.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 25-10 against the money line (+14.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 21-11 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-7 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 31-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 11-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 18-7 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 29-8 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 33-10 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 49-21 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 14-5 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 168-174 against the money line (+35.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 173-160 against the money line (+33.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-70 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 15-8 | +1.5 | 14-9 | 14-9 | 84.2 | 41.9 | 45.7% | 40.3 | 80.5 | 42.1 | 44.6% | 39.3 | Road Games | 15-8 | +1.5 | 14-9 | 14-9 | 84.2 | 41.9 | 45.7% | 40.3 | 80.5 | 42.1 | 44.6% | 39.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.6 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 88.2 | 43.8 | 49.9% | 36.4 | 92.2 | 48.6 | 49.1% | 36.0 | Division Games | 15-8 | +1.5 | 14-9 | 14-9 | 84.2 | 41.9 | 45.7% | 40.3 | 80.5 | 42.1 | 44.6% | 39.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.2 | 41.9 | 31-67 | 45.7% | 8-21 | 38.6% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 40 | 10 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.2 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 80.9% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.2 | 41.9 | 31-67 | 45.7% | 8-21 | 38.6% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 40 | 10 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.5 | 42.1 | 29-66 | 44.6% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 80.1% | 39 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.9 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 15-18 | 80.9% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.5 | 42.1 | 29-66 | 44.6% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 14-17 | 80.1% | 39 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-4 | +8.2 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 87.5 | 44.4 | 47.0% | 41.2 | 76.0 | 36.4 | 40.1% | 42.1 | Road Games | 18-3 | +9.2 | 13-8 | 11-10 | 87.7 | 44.4 | 47.3% | 41.0 | 75.5 | 35.9 | 39.9% | 41.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 2-2 | 4-1 | 93.4 | 47.8 | 47.9% | 39.4 | 83.6 | 42.6 | 43.3% | 40.6 | Division Games | 18-4 | +8.2 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 87.5 | 44.4 | 47.0% | 41.2 | 76.0 | 36.4 | 40.1% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.5 | 44.4 | 32-68 | 47.0% | 8-21 | 39.5% | 15-19 | 81.7% | 41 | 8 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.6 | 41.9 | 31-68 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 80.7% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.7 | 44.4 | 32-68 | 47.3% | 8-21 | 39.4% | 15-19 | 82.0% | 41 | 8 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 36.4 | 27-69 | 40.1% | 7-23 | 30.8% | 14-17 | 82.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 34.2% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 35.9 | 27-69 | 39.9% | 7-24 | 30.3% | 14-16 | 83.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.7, SEATTLE 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
8/13/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 77-87 | L | +175 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 19 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 11 | 8/15/2020 | *NEW YORK | 94-64 | W | -330 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 44 | 16 | 20-66 | 30.3% | 43 | 19 | 8/19/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-84 | W | -250 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 15 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 40 | 10 | 8/21/2020 | *PHOENIX | 90-80 | W | +120 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 42 | 14 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 8/23/2020 | *ATLANTA | 75-78 | L | -600 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 14 | 8/28/2020 | *ATLANTA | 88-79 | W | -400 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 46 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 42 | 16 | 8/30/2020 | *PHOENIX | 79-83 | L | -155 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 37 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 17 | 8/31/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 96-78 | W | +200 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 39 | 7 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 10 | 9/2/2020 | *CHICAGO | 86-83 | W | +145 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 35 | 16 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 45 | 23 | 9/4/2020 | *DALLAS | 88-75 | W | -175 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 51 | 12 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 10 | 9/6/2020 | *SEATTLE | 88-103 | L | +250 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 24 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 28 | 12 | 9/8/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 86-89 | L | -360 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 32 | 12 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 29 | 10 | 9/10/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 89-104 | L | +175 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 35 | 12 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 6 | 9/12/2020 | *INDIANA | 98-86 | W | -300 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 35 | 9 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 12 | 9/17/2020 | *PHOENIX | 80-79 | W | -200 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 12 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 39 | 15 | 9/22/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/14/2020 | *DALLAS | 83-65 | W | -1050 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 48 | 14 | 24-74 | 32.4% | 46 | 12 | 8/16/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 95-72 | W | -550 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 36 | 11 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 49 | 11 | 8/18/2020 | *NEW YORK | 105-64 | W | | 41-77 | 53.2% | 44 | 16 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 45 | 22 | 8/20/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-90 | L | | 28-64 | 43.7% | 32 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 53 | 17 | 8/22/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 74-82 | L | -210 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 13 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 51 | 16 | 8/25/2020 | *INDIANA | 87-74 | W | | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 43 | 18 | 8/29/2020 | *CHICAGO | 88-74 | W | -210 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 14 | 9/2/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 71-64 | W | | 24-62 | 38.7% | 52 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 33 | 7 | 9/4/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 90-89 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 32 | 13 | 9/6/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 103-88 | W | -330 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 28 | 12 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 24 | 9/9/2020 | *DALLAS | 107-95 | W | -950 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 40 | 10 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 12 | 9/11/2020 | *PHOENIX | 83-60 | W | -200 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 46 | 16 | 15-62 | 24.2% | 40 | 14 | 9/13/2020 | LAS VEGAS | 84-86 | L | +105 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 46 | 11 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 50 | 9 | 9/22/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/24/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SEATTLE is 40-42 (+7.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 8-2 (+6.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
9/6/2020 | SEATTLE | 103 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 28 | 7 | 12 | N | MINNESOTA | 88 | 161 | Over | 38 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 12-26 | 46.2% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 42 | 14 | 24 | 7/28/2020 | MINNESOTA | 66 | 154 | Over | 35 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 47 | 15 | 19 | N | SEATTLE | 90 | -8 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 9/11/2019 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 149.5 | Over | 41 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 46 | 11 | 18 | | SEATTLE | 84 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 33 | 4 | 11 | 8/18/2019 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 149.5 | Over | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 29 | 7 | 17 | | SEATTLE | 82 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 32 | 10 | 16 | 7/17/2019 | SEATTLE | 90 | 147 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 39 | 6 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -5.5 | Over | 40 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 6/4/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 148.5 | Over | 39 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 22 | 3 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 84 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 33 | 8 | 20 | 5/29/2019 | SEATTLE | 61 | 152.5 | Under | 24 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 30 | 8 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -4 | SU ATS | 39 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 52 | 11 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 52-18 against the money line (+21.3 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 157-79 against the money line (+30.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 73-32 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 110-43 against the money line (+27.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 84-29 against the money line (+30.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 66-18 against the money line (+39.4 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 80-26 against the money line (+34.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 43-12 against the money line (+22.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 23-6 against the money line (+14.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 46-19 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 30-9 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 17-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in the conference finals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 32-18 against the money line (+13.2 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 84-52 against the money line (+14.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 72-47 against the money line (+9.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 40-23 against the money line (+15.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-24 against the money line (+10.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 66-34 against the money line (+26.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 66-30 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 49-21 against the money line (+20.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-29 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 50-19 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 184-88 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 134-60 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 116-46 against the money line (+30.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 193-90 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 150-61 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 117-46 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 96-35 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 79-26 against the money line (+29.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 67-19 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 150-66 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 91-30 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 58-17 against the money line (+29.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 147-63 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 198-86 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 175-81 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 47-61 against the money line (-32.3 Units) on Tuesday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 37-65 against the money line (-30.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 114-137 against the money line (-49.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 53-48 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 72-60 against the money line (-24.3 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 55-47 against the money line (-32.9 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 16-19 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 15-20 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 44-55 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 25-39 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 43-47 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 130-86 against the money line (-31.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-28 against the money line (-20.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-37 against the money line (-25.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 48-44 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 30-37 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 61-55 against the money line (-26.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-49 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 25-33 against the money line (-27.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 40-40 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-49 against the money line (-34.8 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 140-92 against the money line (-35.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 63-55 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 54-47 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 63-53 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 38-38 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 55-54 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-31 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 127-80 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 40-44 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 41-39 against the money line (-20.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 64-30 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-13 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 39-17 against the money line (+18.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 38-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 16-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 14-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 15-6 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 15-7 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 34-17 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 20-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 31-11 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 18-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 11-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 40-13 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 29-8 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 47-16 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 41-12 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 36-10 against the money line (+27.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 31-10 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 33-10 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 49-21 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 17-9 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 24-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 14-5 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 84.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 22-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 43-14 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 36-21 against the money line (+16.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 32-12 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 47-18 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 34-14 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 51-22 against the money line (+21.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 27-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 39-21 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 20-7 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 30-10 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 35-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 53-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-12 against the money line (+16.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 48-18 against the money line (+27.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 28-13 against the money line (+12.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 32-13 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 47-19 against the money line (+23.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 33-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 49-23 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 12-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 22-4 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 7*) | Hughes is 35-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 53-25 against the money line (+14.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 29-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-12 against the money line (+18.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 14-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 20-8 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 32-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 49-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-14 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 43-22 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
[G] 09/21/2020 - Lexie Brown is out for season ( Concussion ) | [C] 09/21/2020 - Sylvia Fowles is "?" Tuesday vs Seattle Storm ( Calf ) | [F] 07/30/2020 - Maya Moore is out for season ( Personal ) | |
[F] 09/18/2020 - Breanna Stewart is probable Tuesday vs Min Lynx ( Foot ) | [G] 09/18/2020 - Sue Bird is probable Tuesday vs Min Lynx ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:32:01 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|