| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
First Half Results
WASHINGTON |
|
|
85
| 46
Final
43 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 313 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 314 | WASHINGTON | -2 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(109-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +30.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
 - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (CONNECTICUT) - cold team - failing to cover 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread against opponent after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(30-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(60-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(196-134 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +48.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(151-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.6%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(39-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(209-140 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more.
(161-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite.
(98-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(117-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +54.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game.
(52-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(119-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +56.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games.
(84-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 4*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - dominant rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game.
(52-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more.
(189-127 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(128-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%).
(40-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more.
(205-138 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more.
(159-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite.
(77-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(54-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(97-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.4%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game.
(99-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.9%, +45.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - good rebounding team - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game, in May, June, or July games.
(72-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(234-163 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more.
(184-122 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.1%, +49.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(134-77 since 1997.) (63.5%, +49.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(190-118 since 1997.) (61.7%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win against a division rival.
(190-121 since 1997.) (61.1%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in June games.
(51-25 since 1997.) (67.1%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (CONNECTICUT) - after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(123-76 since 1997.) (61.8%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 43 | | 33-73 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 35.4% | 12-17 | 72.8% | 45 | 14 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | | 44 | | 31-70 | 43.7% | 8-22 | 36.1% | 17-20 | 83.6% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT covered the first half line 522 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 451 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 506 games went over first half total, while 446 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 47.4, OPPONENT 38.4 | CONNECTICUT is 151-109 against the 1rst half line (+31.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.7, OPPONENT 38.9 | CONNECTICUT is 33-17 against the 1rst half line (+14.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 44.7, OPPONENT 40.4 | WASHINGTON is 58-82 against the 1rst half line (-32.2 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 38.2 | WASHINGTON is 28-61 against the 1rst half line (-39.1 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.2, OPPONENT 43.1 | WASHINGTON is 104-181 against the 1rst half line (-95.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 41.4 | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.7, OPPONENT 47.9 | WASHINGTON is 33-55 against the 1rst half line (-27.5 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.3, OPPONENT 38.5 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 45-66 against the 1rst half line (-27.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.0, OPPONENT 38.1 | CONNECTICUT is 79-149 against the 1rst half line (-84.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 38.7, OPPONENT 42.3 | CONNECTICUT is 53-96 against the 1rst half line (-52.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.6, OPPONENT 43.7 | WASHINGTON is 131-84 against the 1rst half line (+38.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.1, OPPONENT 38.5 | WASHINGTON is 17-6 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 48.4, OPPONENT 40.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 16-4 OVER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.5, OPPONENT 46.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 51-32 UNDER (+15.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 34.6 | WASHINGTON is 147-113 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.8 | WASHINGTON is 103-76 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 35.9 | WASHINGTON is 58-35 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 35.6 |
|
| | | | |
|
WASHINGTON is 80-108 against the 1rst half line (-38.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 64-92 against the 1rst half line (-37.2 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.4, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.5, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.8, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-8 OVER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-3 OVER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.8, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.7, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-5 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.4, OPPONENT 43.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.7, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-21 OVER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.4, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-22 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 171-134 UNDER (+23.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 101-72 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 37.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 97-70 UNDER (+20.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-62 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 42.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 96-133 against the 1rst half line (-50.3 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-57 against the 1rst half line (-26.7 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-47 against the 1rst half line (-24.7 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-7 against the 1rst half line (-7.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-100 against the 1rst half line (-37.0 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-70 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-65 against the 1rst half line (-27.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-65 against the 1rst half line (-27.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 58-87 against the 1rst half line (-37.7 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 45.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 33-19 OVER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-21 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-18 OVER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.2, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-8 OVER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.4, OPPONENT 42.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.9, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-15 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.5, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-13 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 44.1, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.9, OPPONENT 41.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.7, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 43.2, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 59-39 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 36.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 150-108 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 125-90 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 199-144 UNDER (+40.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 259-169 UNDER (+73.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 233-179 UNDER (+36.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 151-109 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 100-60 UNDER (+34.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 106-72 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-13 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 99-68 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 35-19 UNDER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 66-45 UNDER (+16.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 182-134 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-28 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 162-119 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-18 UNDER (+17.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-5 | -5.4 | 6-7 | 7-5 | 88.7 | 42.1 | 45.4% | 47.6 | 81.2 | 43.4 | 42.4% | 40.7 | | Road Games | 4-4 | -2.9 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 85.5 | 40.5 | 43.0% | 49.2 | 81.1 | 42.4 | 43.2% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.7 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 82.4 | 36.6 | 42.8% | 43.0 | 88.0 | 46.8 | 45.9% | 42.6 | | Division Games | 5-3 | -5.4 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 87.1 | 42.7 | 43.9% | 50.0 | 78.6 | 43.4 | 42.1% | 40.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 88.7 | 42.1 | 34-74 | 45.4% | 7-22 | 34.0% | 14-19 | 73.9% | 48 | 12 | 19 | 23 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 78.3% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.5 | 40.5 | 33-76 | 43.0% | 7-24 | 30.9% | 12-18 | 70.9% | 49 | 13 | 18 | 24 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 43.4 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 19-23 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.1 | 42.4 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 78.6% | 42 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 8-5 | +4.8 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 84.5 | 43.8 | 45.8% | 38.1 | 82.2 | 40.8 | 45.5% | 41.8 | | Home Games | 4-3 | +0.8 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 80.7 | 37.7 | 43.9% | 37.4 | 79.4 | 40.1 | 45.1% | 44.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 88.4 | 50.2 | 47.8% | 36.6 | 82.6 | 41.6 | 44.8% | 40.0 | | Division Games | 5-1 | +6.2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 85.8 | 49.8 | 45.3% | 39.0 | 79.2 | 38.5 | 42.6% | 44.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 43.8 | 31-67 | 45.8% | 8-22 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 37.7 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 31.4% | 12-13 | 87.2% | 37 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 40.8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 78.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 15-20 | 78.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.4 | 40.1 | 29-65 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 73.4% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.2, WASHINGTON 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/20/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 101-65 | 49-37 | -10.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 37-79 | 46.8% | 51 | 8 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 53 | 19 | | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 102-94 | 46-47 | -2.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 40-64 | 62.5% | 40 | 20 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 18 | 11 | | 5/26/2018 | INDIANA | 86-77 | 47-38 | -9.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 44 | 13 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 44 | 18 | | 6/1/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 110-72 | 48-35 | -5.5 | W | 84 | U | 42-82 | 51.2% | 56 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | | 6/3/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-64 | 49-35 | -3.5 | W | 85 | U | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | | 6/5/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-82 | 40-46 | -3.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | | 6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | 41-54 | -3 | L | 82 | O | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | 44-38 | -3 | W | 83.5 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | 37-65 | -5 | L | 85.5 | O | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | 45-52 | 1 | L | 87.5 | O | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | 21-43 | 3 | L | 85.5 | U | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | 37-29 | -3 | W | 81 | U | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | 43-45 | -4.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/20/2018 | INDIANA | 82-75 | 38-30 | -7.5 | W | 75 | U | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 15 | | 5/22/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 75-70 | 23-31 | -10.5 | L | 76 | U | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 22 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 49 | 15 | | 5/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 93-84 | 51-44 | -2.5 | W | 76 | O | 33-65 | 50.8% | 41 | 12 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 31 | 12 | | 5/27/2018 | MINNESOTA | 90-78 | 46-39 | 2.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 13 | | 5/29/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 77-81 | 39-41 | 4 | W | 80.5 | U | 29-67 | 43.3% | 39 | 14 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 16 | | 5/30/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 103-95 | 49-43 | 4.5 | W | 79 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 42 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 29 | 13 | | 6/1/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 73-85 | 37-46 | -3.5 | L | 83.5 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 48 | 14 | | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-88 | 35-49 | 3.5 | L | 85 | U | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | | 6/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 80-88 | 42-48 | 2 | L | 78.5 | O | 33-66 | 50.0% | 27 | 11 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 17 | | 6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-91 | 65-37 | 5 | W | 85.5 | O | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | 34-52 | 2 | L | 78.5 | O | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | 46-32 | -5.5 | W | 83.5 | U | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | 64-39 | -3 | W | 83.5 | O | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 42-36 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 48 of 77 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 5-3 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 21-16 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON since 1997 | | 25 of 37 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 4-0 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 173 | SU ATS | 65 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 8 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9 | Over | 37 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 59 | 14 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 172 | Under | 35 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 8/29/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 55 | 13 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -2 | Under | 38 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 53 | 9 | 11 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 168 | Over | 58 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 11 | 7 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 162.5 | ATS | 32 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 49 | 13 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -7.5 | SU Under | 34 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 48 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 39.9, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-25 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.4, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.1, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 40.0, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in road games versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 41.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) in home games off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 34.4, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-29 against the 1rst half line (-19.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) in home games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 105-87 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 65-46 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-28 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 25-15 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.5, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-37 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 38-26 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 83-70 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 79-66 against the 1rst half line (+6.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 81-63 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 75-60 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 66-52 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 43.6, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 104-91 OVER (+3.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 70-52 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-29 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 74-50 OVER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-28 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.3, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 30-19 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.6, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 34-22 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.5, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 55-41 OVER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-35 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 22-10 OVER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.5, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 39-21 OVER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.6, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 45-28 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.3, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 42.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 36-16 OVER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 41.3, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 85-71 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.1, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 30-12 OVER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.1, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 15-4 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 35-16 OVER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 20-6 OVER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.6, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 79-59 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 61-42 OVER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 68-54 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 51-38 UNDER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.9, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 88-56 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.0, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 37.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 63-49 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.3, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 108-78 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 115-85 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 36.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 99-59 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 36.0, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 88-59 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 36.1, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 120-90 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 36.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 31-11 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Miller 35.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 211 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 184 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 6 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 8 games went over the first half total, while 5 games went under the first half total. | Over the last 3 seasons, 8 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went over the first half total, while 1 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/1/2024 2:44:22 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|