| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT WASHINGTON |
|
| 171.5 | 80 Final 92 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
313 | CONNECTICUT | +145 | 314 | WASHINGTON | -165 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (358-143 since 1997.) (71.5%, +89.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (47-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (215-154 since 1997.) (58.3%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread. (80-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +43.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (103-70 since 1997.) (59.5%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (86-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +28.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (190-111 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (95-30 since 1997.) (76%, +44.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (139-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (87-26 since 1997.) (77%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season. (40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (85-38 since 1997.) (69.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (113-44 since 1997.) (72%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (78-37 since 1997.) (67.8%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (104-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (55-22 since 1997.) (71.4%, +35 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (78-48 since 1997.) (61.9%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (109-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (45-10 since 1997.) (81.8%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (41-6 since 1997.) (87.2%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (152-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +35.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (33-6 since 1997.) (84.6%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after being beaten by the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season. (34-17 since 1997.) (66.7%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (180-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +31 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (49-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +32.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season. (50-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (48-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +25.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (25-1 over the last 5 seasons.) (96.2%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (27-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.4%, +19.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential). (252-87 since 1997.) (74.3%, +71.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more. (174-49 since 1997.) (78%, +69.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (196-142 since 1997.) (58%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more. (120-33 since 1997.) (78.4%, +50.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (99-26 since 1997.) (79.2%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (36-19 since 1997.) (65.5%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in June games. (55-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +17.7 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 33-73 | 45.1% | 7-21 | 35.4% | 12-17 | 72.8% | 45 | 14 | 13 | WASHINGTON | 86 | | 31-70 | 43.7% | 8-22 | 36.1% | 17-20 | 83.6% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 508 times, while CONNECTICUT won 464 times. Edge against the money line=CONNECTICUT |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 78-34 against the money line (+45.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 122-103 against the money line (+22.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.4 | CONNECTICUT is 25-4 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.2, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 84-127 against the money line (-58.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 6-12 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 85.9 | WASHINGTON is 75-119 against the money line (-49.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | WASHINGTON is 17-40 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 88.1 | WASHINGTON is 6-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 91.6 | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 82.8 | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 85.0 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.5 | CONNECTICUT is 60-70 against the money line (-32.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 13-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 87.1 | CONNECTICUT is 36-111 against the money line (-108.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 90.5 | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.5, OPPONENT 82.0 | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 90.0, OPPONENT 82.8 | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 92.6, OPPONENT 83.1 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 34-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-14 against the money line (+11.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 171-124 against the money line (+26.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 134-215 against the money line (-62.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 47-58 against the money line (-28.0 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 156-235 against the money line (-81.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 216-321 against the money line (-105.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-41 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 47-123 against the money line (-52.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-52 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 42-36 against the money line (+18.6 Units) in road games in June games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 85-90 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-14 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 53-39 against the money line (+22.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-19 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing 4 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-24 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 286-416 against the money line (-120.0 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 79-83 against the money line (-50.4 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 167-183 against the money line (-74.0 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 116-128 against the money line (-45.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 111-122 against the money line (-53.7 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 169-248 against the money line (-101.3 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-162 against the money line (-65.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 138-200 against the money line (-61.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 136-218 against the money line (-86.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-27 against the money line (-18.4 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-90 against the money line (-53.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 48-70 against the money line (-33.0 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-9 against the money line (-12.6 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 81-98 against the money line (-41.6 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-63 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-68 against the money line (-32.3 Units) off a road win since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-213 against the money line (-69.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-36 against the money line (-25.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 68-70 against the money line (-34.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 52-59 against the money line (-30.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-30 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-207 against the money line (-83.5 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 125-159 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 17-21 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-61 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-5 | -5.4 | 6-7 | 7-5 | 88.7 | 42.1 | 45.4% | 47.6 | 81.2 | 43.4 | 42.4% | 40.7 | Road Games | 4-4 | -2.9 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 85.5 | 40.5 | 43.0% | 49.2 | 81.1 | 42.4 | 43.2% | 41.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.7 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 82.4 | 36.6 | 42.8% | 43.0 | 88.0 | 46.8 | 45.9% | 42.6 | Division Games | 5-3 | -5.4 | 3-5 | 4-3 | 87.1 | 42.7 | 43.9% | 50.0 | 78.6 | 43.4 | 42.1% | 40.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.7 | 42.1 | 34-74 | 45.4% | 7-22 | 34.0% | 14-19 | 73.9% | 48 | 12 | 19 | 23 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.1 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 78.3% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.5 | 40.5 | 33-76 | 43.0% | 7-24 | 30.9% | 12-18 | 70.9% | 49 | 13 | 18 | 24 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 43.4 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 19-23 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79.5 | 39.6 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.1 | 42.4 | 28-66 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 78.6% | 42 | 7 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-5 | +4.8 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 84.5 | 43.8 | 45.8% | 38.1 | 82.2 | 40.8 | 45.5% | 41.8 | Home Games | 4-3 | +0.8 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 80.7 | 37.7 | 43.9% | 37.4 | 79.4 | 40.1 | 45.1% | 44.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 88.4 | 50.2 | 47.8% | 36.6 | 82.6 | 41.6 | 44.8% | 40.0 | Division Games | 5-1 | +6.2 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 85.8 | 49.8 | 45.3% | 39.0 | 79.2 | 38.5 | 42.6% | 44.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.5 | 43.8 | 31-67 | 45.8% | 8-22 | 36.0% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 37.7 | 31-70 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 31.4% | 12-13 | 87.2% | 37 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 40.8 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 78.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 15-20 | 78.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.4 | 40.1 | 29-65 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 36.2% | 15-20 | 73.4% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.2, WASHINGTON 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
5/20/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 101-65 | W | | 37-79 | 46.8% | 51 | 8 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 53 | 19 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 102-94 | W | -200 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 40 | 20 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 18 | 11 | 5/26/2018 | INDIANA | 86-77 | W | | 32-66 | 48.5% | 44 | 13 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 44 | 18 | 6/1/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 110-72 | W | -500 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 56 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 23 | 6/3/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-64 | W | -270 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 6/5/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-82 | L | -270 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | 6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -220 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | W | -250 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | L | -450 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/20/2018 | INDIANA | 82-75 | W | -950 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 10 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 15 | 5/22/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 75-70 | W | | 28-67 | 41.8% | 45 | 22 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 49 | 15 | 5/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 93-84 | W | -210 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 41 | 12 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 31 | 12 | 5/27/2018 | MINNESOTA | 90-78 | W | +175 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 41 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 13 | 5/29/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 77-81 | L | +250 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 39 | 14 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 16 | 5/30/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 103-95 | W | +280 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 42 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 29 | 13 | 6/1/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 73-85 | L | -300 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 48 | 14 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 64-88 | L | +210 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 6/7/2018 | MINNESOTA | 80-88 | L | +155 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 27 | 11 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 17 | 6/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-91 | W | +325 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 6/15/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86-97 | L | +155 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 31 | 12 | 35-56 | 62.5% | 31 | 16 | 6/19/2018 | CHICAGO | 88-60 | W | -500 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 50 | 12 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 44 | 17 | 6/22/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 93-77 | W | -220 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 37 | 19 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 19 | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2018 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/8/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
CONNECTICUT is 46-32 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 4-4 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 20-18 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 173 | SU ATS | 65 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 8 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9 | Over | 37 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 59 | 14 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 172 | Under | 35 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 8/29/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 169.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 10-20 | 50.0% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 55 | 13 | 7 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -2 | Under | 38 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 53 | 9 | 11 | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 168 | Over | 58 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 13 | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 11 | 7 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 162.5 | ATS | 32 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 49 | 13 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -7.5 | SU Under | 34 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 48 | 12 | 9 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 23-14 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 25-19 against the money line (+12.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 30-25 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+13.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-14 against the money line (+11.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-11 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-21 against the money line (-16.1 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-32 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-33 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 11-17 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-18 against the money line (-15.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-13 against the money line (-15.8 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 18-25 against the money line (-14.1 Units) off a road win as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-26 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 11-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-41 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 8-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-27 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 38-57 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Miller is 17-21 against the money line (-15.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 7-13 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 31-28 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in June games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 62-59 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 59-54 against the money line (+8.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 39-31 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-2 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 68-30 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-4 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 79.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 13-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 80.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 89-51 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 241 times, while the road underdog won straight up 163 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 7:44:21 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|