| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 613 | LAS VEGAS | -850 | | 614 | WASHINGTON | +550 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(111-78 since 1997.) (58.7%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(72-32 since 1997.) (69.2%, +37.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(97-61 since 1997.) (61.4%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(51-35 since 1997.) (59.3%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +28 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(74-45 since 1997.) (62.2%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(44-22 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(29-14 since 1997.) (67.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(16-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +28.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(65-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.1%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(32-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(81-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(65-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (42.5%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(58-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(260-175 since 1997.) (59.8%, +77.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(120-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.4%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(236-187 since 1997.) (55.8%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(161-143 over the last 5 seasons.) (53%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(130-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(131-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(111-78 since 1997.) (58.7%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(147-103 since 1997.) (58.8%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less.
(88-53 since 1997.) (62.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(54-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(98-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(59-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +27.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(52-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(52-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.1%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(98-63 since 1997.) (60.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(74-16 since 1997.) (82.2%, +42.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(82-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(87-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +37.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(90-54 since 1997.) (62.5%, +42.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(115-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, on Saturday games.
(88-26 since 1997.) (77.2%, +39.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(37-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(38-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(76-22 since 1997.) (77.6%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(37-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(91-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(64-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(108-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(104-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(117-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(42-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(68-20 since 1997.) (77.3%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(38-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(41-5 since 1997.) (89.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(116-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(107-75 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(48-28 since 1997.) (63.2%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(70-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(106-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - bad pressure defensive team - forcing <=12 turnovers/game.
(45-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 12 points in two consecutive games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(80-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(28-14 since 1997.) (66.7%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points.
(38-21 since 1997.) (64.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(116-79 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(28-13 since 1997.) (68.3%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(40-22 since 1997.) (64.5%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(83-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(148-122 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.8%, +38.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +21.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(39-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +8.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(113-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.3%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off a road win by 10 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(30-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +19 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(164-133 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.2%, +39.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(32-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(118-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - off a road win by 10 points or more.
(50-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(42-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(121-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(67-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(144-144 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(78-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +43.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(83-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +48.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(56-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +37.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(93-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.7%, +40.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(80-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.6%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LAS VEGAS) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(74-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.2%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(169-175 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.1%, +36 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| LAS VEGAS | 86 | | 30-67 | 45.3% | 9-25 | 33.9% | 17-20 | 84.5% | 44 | 7 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 81 | | 30-70 | 43.0% | 10-27 | 36.8% | 11-14 | 79.0% | 41 | 7 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LAS VEGAS won the game straight up 626 times, while WASHINGTON won 343 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LAS VEGAS is 106-45 against the money line (+77.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 | LAS VEGAS is 99-74 against the money line (+32.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.3, OPPONENT 76.6 | LAS VEGAS is 9-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 94.4, OPPONENT 80.9 | LAS VEGAS is 251-106 against the money line (+144.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.6, OPPONENT 81.4 | LAS VEGAS is 24-2 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in road games when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 96.8, OPPONENT 83.8 | WASHINGTON is 32-44 against the money line (-24.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 80.1 | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.9 | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-16 against the money line (-16.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 84.3 | WASHINGTON is 4-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | WASHINGTON is 7-30 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 88.2 | WASHINGTON is 5-24 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 90.2 | WASHINGTON is 13-20 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | WASHINGTON is 109-157 against the money line (-59.9 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 12-27 against the money line (-18.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 86.2 |
|
LAS VEGAS is 211-218 against the money line (-80.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 81.2 | LAS VEGAS is 10-9 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.3, OPPONENT 80.0 | LAS VEGAS is 64-84 against the money line (-46.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.3, OPPONENT 81.2 | LAS VEGAS is 5-6 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.9, OPPONENT 76.6 | LAS VEGAS is 2-5 against the money line (-15.4 Units) when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.1, OPPONENT 87.3 | LAS VEGAS is 56-66 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | LAS VEGAS is 4-5 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.5, OPPONENT 86.8 | LAS VEGAS is 131-155 against the money line (-52.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.0, OPPONENT 78.6 | WASHINGTON is 94-90 against the money line (+21.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | WASHINGTON is 35-23 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 |
|
| | |
|
LAS VEGAS is 55-47 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 32-40 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 62-68 against the money line (-34.3 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 78-120 against the money line (-45.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 154-219 against the money line (-77.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 232-302 against the money line (-95.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 199-285 against the money line (-98.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 306-409 against the money line (-126.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-130 against the money line (-45.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 149-194 against the money line (-65.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-113 against the money line (-44.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 69-166 against the money line (-61.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 95-153 against the money line (-65.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-206 against the money line (-69.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 144-136 against the money line (-65.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-6 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 21-14 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 187-222 against the money line (-87.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 56-71 against the money line (-36.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 4-5 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 133-141 against the money line (-67.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-8 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 98-127 against the money line (-82.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 152-171 against the money line (-78.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 174-177 against the money line (-67.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-8 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 140-156 against the money line (-54.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 79.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 203-228 against the money line (-75.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 144-154 against the money line (-55.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 43-21 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 188-217 against the money line (-82.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 279-308 against the money line (-94.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-8 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 164-173 against the money line (-64.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 240-250 against the money line (-78.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 118-129 against the money line (-52.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 16-6 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 9-17 against the money line (-18.3 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 26-37 against the money line (-26.5 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-51 against the money line (-21.9 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 224-219 against the money line (-84.6 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-26 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 149-209 against the money line (-68.5 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 227-306 against the money line (-109.0 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-31 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-16.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 149-209 against the money line (-68.5 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-23 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 72-112 against the money line (-63.4 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 93-134 against the money line (-71.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-15 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 37-63 against the money line (-56.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 46-82 against the money line (-63.1 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 4-8 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 114-178 against the money line (-59.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 186-259 against the money line (-79.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-34 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-76 against the money line (-36.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 70-77 against the money line (-40.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-10 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 34-38 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-26 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-29 against the money line (-25.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-39 against the money line (-28.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-29 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-15 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-29 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 58-68 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-36 against the money line (-22.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-14 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-33 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-21 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 49-101 against the money line (-41.9 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-31 against the money line (-27.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 4-8 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 113-123 against the money line (-45.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LAS VEGAS is 337-385 against the money line (-120.9 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 210-121 against the money line (-87.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-6 against the money line (-28.0 Units) as a road favorite of -500 to -850 since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 4-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 171-222 against the money line (-105.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 180-217 against the money line (-95.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 78.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 4-6 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 162-188 against the money line (-60.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 19-21 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LAS VEGAS is 64-68 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 4-5 against the money line (-13.2 Units) off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 176-174 against the money line (-78.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.6, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 140-131 against the money line (-76.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 120-96 against the money line (-59.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 199-194 against the money line (-67.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 126-126 against the money line (-56.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 152-138 against the money line (-55.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 82.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 69-60 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 84-64 against the money line (-38.7 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 174-173 against the money line (-61.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 81.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 109-102 against the money line (-50.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 76-64 against the money line (-35.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 49-24 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 45-24 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 44-21 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 10-8 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 87.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 1-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 1-4 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 151-186 against the money line (-84.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 77.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 57-83 against the money line (-50.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 76.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LAS VEGAS is 166-164 against the money line (-71.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 80.6, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LAS VEGAS is 6-6 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 83.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 53-42 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 84.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LAS VEGAS is 8-8 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 86.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 71-62 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 9-6 | -11.4 | 6-9 | 9-6 | 87.7 | 43.7 | 44.3% | 42.5 | 84.5 | 39.7 | 44.3% | 41.8 | | Road Games | 4-2 | -6 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 89.8 | 44.7 | 44.7% | 41.0 | 83.8 | 39.5 | 43.1% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 91.8 | 47.0 | 49.1% | 41.2 | 85.8 | 39.0 | 46.7% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.7 | 43.7 | 31-69 | 44.3% | 10-28 | 34.2% | 17-21 | 82.8% | 42 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.6 | 41 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 89.8 | 44.7 | 31-69 | 44.7% | 10-26 | 36.9% | 18-22 | 85.4% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 39.7 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 9-23 | 38.4% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 42 | 6 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 43.2% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 15-18 | 79.2% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.8 | 39.5 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 7-22 | 33.1% | 17-19 | 87.9% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 4-14 | -7.2 | 12-6 | 11-7 | 79.3 | 41.4 | 42.9% | 39.8 | 82.6 | 40.4 | 44.4% | 42.8 | | Home Games | 3-6 | -2.3 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 82.1 | 43.2 | 43.7% | 42.4 | 81.6 | 40.1 | 42.5% | 43.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 88.8 | 47.4 | 46.9% | 41.0 | 83.2 | 42.6 | 44.0% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.3 | 41.4 | 29-67 | 42.9% | 10-27 | 35.9% | 12-16 | 77.9% | 40 | 7 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.1 | 43.2 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 10-27 | 34.8% | 13-17 | 76.7% | 42 | 7 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.6 | 40.4 | 29-65 | 44.4% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 17-22 | 77.7% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 7-21 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.6 | 40.1 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 7-23 | 31.0% | 17-21 | 77.2% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LAS VEGAS 70.7, WASHINGTON 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/21/2024 | PHOENIX | 88-98 | L | | 33-78 | 42.3% | 52 | 9 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 43 | 7 | | 5/25/2024 | INDIANA | 99-80 | W | | 35-73 | 47.9% | 42 | 8 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 41 | 12 | | 5/29/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 80-66 | W | -175 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 14 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 16 | | 5/31/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 74-78 | L | -400 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 42 | 11 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 46 | 11 | | 6/5/2024 | @ DALLAS | 95-81 | W | -450 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 12 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | SEATTLE | 65-78 | L | -330 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 44 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 53 | 12 | | 6/9/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 92-96 | L | -600 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 30 | 6 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 48 | 15 | | 6/11/2024 | MINNESOTA | 86-100 | L | -270 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 46 | 13 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 30 | 9 | | 6/13/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 103-99 | W | -210 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 42 | 14 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 30 | 12 | | 6/15/2024 | NEW YORK | 82-90 | L | -140 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 38 | 10 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 41 | 8 | | 6/19/2024 | SEATTLE | 94-83 | W | -270 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 34 | 14 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 40 | 15 | | 6/21/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 85-74 | W | -210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 47 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | | 6/27/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 95-83 | W | -600 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 42 | 6 | | 6/29/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2024 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/21/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-70 | L | +120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +220 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 42 | 17 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 69-101 | L | +300 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | | 5/29/2024 | ATLANTA | 67-73 | L | +120 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | | 5/31/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +650 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/4/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 59-76 | L | +650 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | | 6/6/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-79 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | INDIANA | 83-85 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | | 6/9/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 26 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 21 | | 6/11/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 87-68 | W | +210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | | 6/14/2024 | CHICAGO | 83-81 | W | +135 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 42 | 14 | | 6/19/2024 | @ INDIANA | 81-88 | L | +175 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 11 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 42 | 10 | | 6/22/2024 | DALLAS | 97-69 | W | +135 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 43 | 13 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 39 | 21 | | 6/23/2024 | DALLAS | 92-84 | W | -115 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 33 | 12 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 14 | | 6/27/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 91-94 | L | +400 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 50 | 23 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 36 | 10 | | 6/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2024 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 28-28 (-1.8 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 4-1 (+9.4 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 14-13 (-4.0 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-0 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus LAS VEGAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/31/2023 | WASHINGTON | 75 | 168.5 | ATS | 30 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 44 | 10 | 10 | | | LAS VEGAS | 84 | -10.5 | SU Under | 40 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 10-28 | 35.7% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 4 | 10 | 08/26/2023 | LAS VEGAS | 62 | -10 | Under | 30 | 20-65 | 30.8% | 6-29 | 20.7% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 50 | 6 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 78 | 170 | SU ATS | 27 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 45 | 6 | 8 | 08/11/2023 | WASHINGTON | 89 | 169.5 | Over | 48 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 12-31 | 38.7% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 42 | 7 | 12 | | | LAS VEGAS | 113 | -17 | SU ATS | 57 | 42-77 | 54.5% | 14-28 | 50.0% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 41 | 3 | 7 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 16-26 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-10 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-15 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 1-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 6-14 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Hammon is 50-22 against the money line (-29.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 24-16 against the money line (-29.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hammon is 24-16 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hammon is 10-8 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 85.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 13-9 against the money line (-19.5 Units) off a road win as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 49-24 against the money line (-30.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 45-24 against the money line (-34.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 44-21 against the money line (-31.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 43-20 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 90.0, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 39-20 against the money line (-32.4 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 18-13 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Hammon is 23-13 against the money line (-23.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 8-6 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 91.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hammon is 21-14 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 88.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 31-16 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 45-23 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 31-16 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 47-23 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 49-23 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 48-23 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 31-16 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 43-21 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 47-22 against the money line (-27.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hammon is 48-23 against the money line (-29.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hammon is 49-23 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LAS VEGAS.
The average score was LAS VEGAS 89.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/2/2024 4:40:41 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|