| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX CONNECTICUT |
|
| 169 | 87 Final 91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | PHOENIX | +135 | 606 | CONNECTICUT | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (363-145 since 1997.) (71.5%, +87.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (51-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (193-114 since 1997.) (62.9%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (91-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +22.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning record on the season. (45-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (69-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (84-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +28.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (114-45 since 1997.) (71.7%, +37.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (79-67 since 1997.) (54.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-47 since 1997.) (65.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (81-51 since 1997.) (61.4%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (99-29 since 1997.) (77.3%, +32.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (28-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.3%, +25 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +14.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (49-22 since 1997.) (69%, +28 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (58-33 since 1997.) (63.7%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (61-35 since 1997.) (63.5%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (168-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against a poor 3PT defense (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (28-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (48-26 since 1997.) (64.9%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (56-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +12.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (34-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.3%, +27.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +23.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +15.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +30.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (31-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (24-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an upset loss as a home favorite against opponent off a road loss. (33-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +30.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a upset loss as a favorite against opponent off a road loss. (53-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival. (203-143 since 1997.) (58.7%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - off a road loss against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest. (78-83 since 1997.) (48.4%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - after playing 2 consecutive road games, playing with 2 days rest. (35-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in non-conference games, off a close home loss by 3 points or less. (69-39 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (95-56 since 1997.) (62.9%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (101-64 since 1997.) (61.2%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (96-57 since 1997.) (62.7%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (99-62 since 1997.) (61.5%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (81-44 since 1997.) (64.8%, +38.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (89-52 since 1997.) (63.1%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (65-30 since 1997.) (68.4%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (91-43 since 1997.) (67.9%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (82-49 since 1997.) (62.6%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (79-46 since 1997.) (63.2%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (58-25 since 1997.) (69.9%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (73-41 since 1997.) (64%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (76-46 since 1997.) (62.3%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (49-19 since 1997.) (72.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (64-35 since 1997.) (64.6%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (PHOENIX) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (41-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (24-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (PHOENIX) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (47-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (47-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (51-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (41-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.1%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (60-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX | 82 | | 29-64 | 45.0% | 8-22 | 37.8% | 16-19 | 85.9% | 39 | 9 | 15 | CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 32-73 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 35.7% | 13-18 | 74.6% | 46 | 16 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 571 times, while PHOENIX won 405 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 93-57 against the money line (+27.0 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 83.9, OPPONENT 79.9 | PHOENIX is 129-96 against the money line (+22.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 77.5 | PHOENIX is 11-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 80.5 | PHOENIX is 8-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 81.6, OPPONENT 74.2 | PHOENIX is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 78.9 | PHOENIX is 16-9 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 85.8, OPPONENT 83.8 | PHOENIX is 18-8 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 85.2, OPPONENT 83.4 | PHOENIX is 8-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 86.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.7 | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 84.8 | CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.5 | CONNECTICUT is 60-73 against the money line (-35.2 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 80.2 | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-14.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 88.4 |
|
PHOENIX is 72-83 against the money line (-34.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 78.8, OPPONENT 79.4 | PHOENIX is 15-22 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.3, OPPONENT 87.4 | PHOENIX is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was PHOENIX 82.2, OPPONENT 92.7 | PHOENIX is 60-90 against the money line (-56.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 76.7, OPPONENT 79.1 | PHOENIX is 12-15 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 81.9 | CONNECTICUT is 10-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.3, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 38-20 against the money line (+22.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 83.6 | CONNECTICUT is 26-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.4, OPPONENT 81.1 |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 23-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 20-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-3 against the money line (+7.5 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 19-16 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 153-105 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 84.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 230-147 against the money line (+33.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 84.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 98-46 against the money line (+31.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 86.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-14 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-10 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-10.7 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.0, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-17 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-10 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 113-117 against the money line (-53.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-28 against the money line (-16.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 44-92 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 74.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 9-20 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 173-128 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 71-60 against the money line (+19.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 6-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) as an underdog this season. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 6-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) as a road underdog this season. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 10-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 15-7 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 86.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 5-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 85.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 73-71 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 85.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 14-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 12-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 4-0 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more this season. The average score was PHOENIX 85.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 5-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 5-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 88.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in all games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-11 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-7.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 39-50 against the money line (-28.4 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-7 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-8 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 12-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 78.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-15 against the money line (-15.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 1-5 against the money line (-7.6 Units) off a road loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 4-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 79.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 10-17 against the money line (-21.8 Units) off a road loss over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 24-37 against the money line (-29.9 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses since 1997. The average score was PHOENIX 72.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 3-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 80.7, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 33-34 against the money line (-20.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 30-40 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.9, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 25-32 against the money line (-25.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 21-30 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 15-20 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 6-14 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 81.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 24-29 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 82.8, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 20-25 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 20-23 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was PHOENIX 84.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-11 against the money line (+14.9 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.5, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-16 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-20 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 63-31 against the money line (+19.8 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 88-65 against the money line (+27.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 52-40 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a home loss since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 69-48 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-25 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-7 | +2 | 13-8 | 10-11 | 82.7 | 43.0 | 45.1% | 39.4 | 80.1 | 41.2 | 41.8% | 43.2 | Road Games | 9-4 | +4.5 | 9-4 | 6-7 | 82.4 | 43.2 | 45.4% | 38.6 | 79.8 | 42.2 | 41.7% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 81.0 | 43.4 | 43.4% | 41.2 | 81.0 | 43.6 | 42.0% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 43.0 | 29-64 | 45.1% | 8-22 | 35.7% | 17-20 | 85.5% | 39 | 7 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.4 | 43.2 | 29-63 | 45.4% | 8-22 | 37.5% | 17-20 | 84.7% | 39 | 7 | 21 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.1 | 41.2 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 15-20 | 78.5% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.8 | 42.2 | 29-69 | 41.7% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 16-20 | 76.9% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | -10.4 | 8-12 | 10-9 | 86.0 | 42.2 | 44.8% | 46.6 | 82.4 | 42.2 | 43.8% | 40.0 | Home Games | 5-2 | -6 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 92.3 | 45.3 | 49.3% | 44.7 | 82.0 | 42.7 | 42.8% | 38.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 77.2 | 39.8 | 41.4% | 46.0 | 82.6 | 40.2 | 45.6% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.0 | 42.2 | 33-73 | 44.8% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 13-18 | 74.0% | 47 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.3 | 45.3 | 34-70 | 49.3% | 8-18 | 41.7% | 16-21 | 75.8% | 45 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.4 | 42.2 | 29-67 | 43.8% | 7-18 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 80.8% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.6 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 80.5% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.0 | 42.7 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 7-18 | 38.7% | 18-22 | 81.0% | 38 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 71, CONNECTICUT 70.6 |
| | |
|
|
6/3/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 78-71 | W | +100 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 15 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 51 | 13 | 6/5/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 80-74 | W | +120 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 29 | 11 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 47 | 17 | 6/8/2018 | CHICAGO | 96-79 | W | -500 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 36 | 9 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 32 | 13 | 6/10/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 72-66 | W | -850 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 58 | 11 | 24-74 | 32.4% | 47 | 10 | 6/12/2018 | @ DALLAS | 75-72 | W | -105 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 17 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 12 | 6/16/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 89-72 | W | -220 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 6/17/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 92-80 | W | -250 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 39 | 8 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 62 | 12 | 6/22/2018 | MINNESOTA | 72-83 | L | -140 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 42 | 17 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 44 | 11 | 6/24/2018 | @ CHICAGO | 88-97 | L | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 39 | 15 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 17 | 6/26/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 83-69 | W | -165 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 13 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 42 | 15 | 6/29/2018 | @ INDIANA | 95-77 | W | -300 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 40 | 17 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 26 | 12 | 6/30/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-74 | W | +145 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 7 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 12 | 7/5/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 84-77 | W | -270 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 7/8/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-76 | L | -200 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 16 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 53 | 15 | 7/10/2018 | @ DALLAS | 72-101 | L | +120 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 21 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 14 | 7/13/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2018 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/3/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 88-64 | W | -270 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 59 | 14 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 35 | 12 | 6/5/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 77-82 | L | -270 | 30-82 | 36.6% | 54 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 45 | 13 | 6/7/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -220 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 52 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 48 | 11 | 6/9/2018 | MINNESOTA | 89-75 | W | -250 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 91-95 | L | -450 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 11 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 6/15/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 92-103 | L | +105 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 6/16/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 72-89 | L | +180 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 41 | 16 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 19 | 6/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 70-75 | L | -220 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 47 | 21 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 55 | 16 | 6/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | 87-78 | W | -360 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 46 | 12 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 31 | 12 | 6/26/2018 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-92 | L | +145 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 37 | 7 | 6/27/2018 | INDIANA | 101-89 | W | -650 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 37 | 16 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 31 | 15 | 7/1/2018 | @ SEATTLE | 70-84 | L | +180 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 7/3/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-72 | W | +350 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 17 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 13 | 7/5/2018 | @ PHOENIX | 77-84 | L | +210 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 45 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 46 | 17 | 7/7/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 90-94 | L | -200 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 9 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 45 | 11 | 7/11/2018 | NEW YORK | 76-79 | L | -450 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 51 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 41 | 13 | 7/13/2018 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2018 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
PHOENIX is 21-18 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
PHOENIX is 6-3 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CONNECTICUT is 12-6 (+3.7 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX since 1997 |
| |
CONNECTICUT is 3-1 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/5/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 77 | 170 | Under | 41 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 45 | 17 | 12 | | PHOENIX | 84 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 24-28 | 85.7% | 46 | 11 | 17 | 6/16/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 172.5 | Under | 21 | 29-79 | 36.7% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 41 | 14 | 16 | | PHOENIX | 89 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 15-15 | 100.0% | 46 | 9 | 19 | 9/10/2017 | PHOENIX | 88 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 37 | 6 | 10 | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -5.5 | Over | 50 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 15-24 | 62.5% | 49 | 11 | 11 | 9/1/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 66 | 170 | Under | 24 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 44 | 10 | 13 | | PHOENIX | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 45 | 4 | 10 | 8/20/2017 | PHOENIX | 66 | 171.5 | Under | 45 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 39 | 10 | 12 | | CONNECTICUT | 94 | -5 | SU ATS | 46 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 53 | 9 | 12 | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | 92 | 167.5 | ATS | 41 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 40 | 2 | 16 | | CONNECTICUT | 93 | -8 | SU Over | 53 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 35 | 6 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Brondello is 28-14 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 76-43 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 67-39 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 44-21 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 12-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 79.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 28-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 30-18 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 47-36 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 62-38 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 89-56 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 48-23 against the money line (+22.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 70-37 against the money line (+19.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 61-35 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 86-52 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 47-22 against the money line (+20.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 72-31 against the money line (+30.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 54-31 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 21-9 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 84.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 62-34 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 89-48 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 50-25 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 73-38 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 57-37 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 30-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 49-22 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 53-34 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-11 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 9-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Brondello is 11-14 against the money line (-12.9 Units) off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 20-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) off a road loss as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 81.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 7-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 80.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 32-32 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 83.5, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 39-43 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 16-21 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of PHOENIX. The average score was PHOENIX 82.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 8-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 79.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 7-13 against the money line (-12.7 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 78.2, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 2-7 against the money line (-9.0 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 71.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 24-16 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 23-20 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+8.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-8 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 13-8 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 36-29 against the money line (+8.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 12-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT. The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.2, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 206 times, while the road underdog won straight up 145 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 07/12/2018 - Diana Taurasi left last game, is "?" Friday vs Connecticut Sun ( Illness ) | [F] 07/03/2018 - Sancho Lyttle is out for season ( ACL ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:13:17 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|